The US Economy Now Run By Women
(www.zerohedge.com)
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Oh, so you are different from men?
Then let's start examining these differences, shall we?
For the record, I don't think this makes even a tiny bit of difference - male or female, they're all in the pockets of corrupt oligarchs.
Women are not empathetic. This is one of the great lies. Women are also not decisive! What a joke.
Women should not be leading anything. They should not be in politics. They should have not been given the vote.
What a clown world where women are running economies into the ground.
Women do not comprehend the difference between empathy and sympathy, they are sympathetic when it suits them and far more violent than any man could be given the power to do so. Abortion should have smacked every sane person in the face. Wait they killed how many millions? They did it for what reasons? They want to continue killing how many a year for equality?
As I understand it, that is LITERALLY the definition of empathy. It's impossible to exhibit care to everybody because you'll quickly run out of energy and resources, so it's designed to ONLY work for those within the in-group. If you are empathetic, you are caring and nurturing for those within your tribe. An hyper empathetic Liberal for example only cares and feels alot for other Liberals and so on.
No, you’re mistaking sympathy and empathy. Sympathy is selectively feeling pity for someone, as in they are beneath you I.E. Savior complex. Empathy is the ability to understand how someone is feeling period. Women have never been able to relate to any male emotions.
Funny how empathy always leads to death and suffering.
Not always. Just when it's extended too far.
This is something I reliazed only resently.
They are not more empathetic, contrary to popular belief.
They are more neurotic. Which means they feel negative emotions more intensely.
Show them a picture of somone suffering and they'll easily be able to well up with feelings of (self)pity and pain, but show them a picture of someone experiencing something positively and their reactions are no more empathetic than men - and more often than not they'll find some unrelated negative emotion to hone in on "oh yeah that must be nice, but have you considered /suffering/ pain/ misery/ misery/ misery".
Yet the whole world has bought this cope that because women are constantly miserable they're somehow better. No, they are just more neurotic and risk-averse, and thus forgiving and submissive towards the in-group, and ruthless and passive-agressive towards the out-group.
They have always carried the flames of whatever ideology is dominant - it's what you would expect neurotic people to do; huddle together and embrace the groupthink for added feelings of protection.
The moment they find a woman even remotely more attractive or assertive than them exists in the same field, they will turnover heaven and hell to put that bitch in the ground.
And they say women can't be funny.
They're going to attempt to crash the economy with no survivors. That way they can finally wipe out the position of the "patriarchy" and rebuild the world in their image.
aggressive short of everything
The money printer is hooked directly to the stock market. The line isn't allowed to go down.
"Economics is not a subject that particularly respects one's wishes."
- Nikita Khrushchev
There will be a reckoning.
Just don't expect to use the stock market as a way to see the reckoning. Your gas gauge will always tell you your tank is full if you glue the needle down.
It is a year old at this point (or more) but I must link to https://brrr.money/
Until they want it to. How long will they keep it up before they decide to crash it?
turbo brrrr won't end well
And Impossible1 shits his pants.
Nah, I already had a hedge in my portfolio against this.
Well, women are in the leadership positions, but they're just following the lead of jewish men. It's boring until there's innovation.
I'm just imagining the thought process that makes you think a 100% female leadership is somehow beholden to the Joos.
When have they ever, ever acted in the interest of anyone but themselves?
truly interesting now. the 2 most entitled self-victimized, tribal, hatefull ppl combating for power.
10 bucks on ... jewish women for duble brutality?
Because every Nazi trad retard is basically no different from a simp, constantly blaming anyone besides white women for problems caused by white women
Has more to do with an objective view of American academia than any sort of blame. White women are sponges. Very few ideas they promote come from their own minds.
THIS???
Couldn't have said it better.
I'm taking my money elsewhere then.
Maybe time to buy more gold.
Crypto? I don't really understand it, that's the problem. I have tiny holdings in most of the coins, but I don't really get it.
Crypto is a decentralized trustless ledger.
The 'decentralized ledger' part means it's an automated way to keep track of things (like ownership), secured by cryptography.
Think of it as a way to digitize and transact value, like the internet digitized and transacted information.
The 'trustless' part means that anyone who transacts with the ledger can trust that it's accurate, even though no one is tasked with verifying or updating it.
The implication being that you don't need third parties anymore. This is where a lot of the high value of coins comes from - these coins (representing platforms, businesses, protocols, exchanges, etc) are replacing third parties (like banks, lawyers, notaries . . . governments). What is the sum value of all these third parties in every concivable industry? Higher than the current crypto market cap by a lot, which is why it's safe to say that we're still early. Of course, with the gains of being early comes the risks; who's to say some black swan event doesn't kill everything in a year. So be careful and don't invest more than you can afford to lose.
As for the coins, you should do your own research. They generally break down along the lines of:
Utility tokens (like a token you must use if you want to use a platform that does rendering, or storage, etc.),
Govenance tokens (those who hold them own the platform, and desicions are made where each token is one vote),
Platform tokens (like ETH, think of them like an OS),
Stable coins (USDC is pegged to the dollar, but there are more interesting and experimental coins that are not pegged to anything yet still stable through economic games),
Security tokens (securities as in stocks - these tokens represent ownership of something, even physical things like real estate), and
Non-fungible tokens or NFTs that certify something as uniqe and authentic.
Some cool blockchain things are:
Defi (decentralized finance), where things like AMMs (automated market makers) give liquidity to tokens by creating pools with incetives for liquidity providers
NFTs, or proofs of ownership of digital content which are programmable and e.g. can automatically give some % of any future transaction price to the creator or can include any set of rights, and
DAOs (decentralized autonimous organizations) which are collectively owned and run organizations, businesses, and even governments.
This is a good video with more technical detail (still very accessible) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBC-nXj3Ng4
Like what?
At least gold is relatively portable and durable.
You're fucked!
"Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyranny."
-Aristotle
Comment Reported for: Rule 16: Identity attacks
Comment Removed.