They can't lose if they keep changing the definitions (context: Stallman's return from cancellation)
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Seriously, an alleged Twitch dev pulled an "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others" unironically.
If we let them change definitions at will, they won't lose, ever.
Just look at "racism = prejudice + power" that gave them free racism against whites for free, how long are we going to let them do it?
What do you mean let them? What can we do besides call them out?
I have no answer for that, I'm sorry.
I wrote it as a rhetorical question to hype up the boys, but now that I think about it seriously I have no idea how to do it
The similarity between this schizoaffective word salad and "academic" postmodernist writing is alarming.
Using words they don't understand? Check.
Using simple nonsense words (badness) because they don't fully understand what they're talking about and want to sound smart? Check.
Either way, advocating a dangerous over-regulation of something that doesn't need regulation and oversight? Check.
God we're headed in a bad direction.
That's peak NPC programming, they behave in such an absurd way but nobody around them notices it.
Also it doesn't help that all the socials are on their side...
redefinition of words and terms is the weapon of someone who does not have reality and truth on their side.
Freedom has nothing to do with the idea they are trying to express, but freedom has positive connotations, so they pervert and twist it.
what they are asking for is to impose their ideology on others, specifically that they should shouldn't suffer consequences for their bad actions and they shouldn't have to acknowledge other viewpoints as valid other than the mandates of the Progressive Death Cult.
A weapon they use all the time because they live in a made up world where logic is dead
They're the ones who murdered logic so their made-up world could be king.
Just like how Democrats are claiming that everything under the sun is a "threat to our democracy.".
They really mean it's a threat to them personally. They don't give a fuck about our democracy.
threats to their democracy are good, considering their idea of it is permanent rule by two cities.
Any definition of freedom for software users would reasonably contain freedom from progressivism, primarily developers.
To allow progressives into development of a product is to impose guilt upon it's users. Just look at Amazon.
"What do you know about freedom? You think freedom means doing what you like. Well, you’re wrong. That isn’t true freedom. True freedom means doing what I tell you." -Shift, The Last Battle
THAT SHIT DOUBLEPLUS UNGOOD, YO
Lol, "badness". These people are children.
you are a stain on tech. we would all be better off without you and those like you.
reposted this to kia2 on ruqqus: https://ruqqus.com/+kotakuinaction2/post/9492/they-cant-lose-if-they-keep
What extra license terms do you want to place on top of the GPL, BSD, MIT licenses? Some people got rightly roasted for trying to prevent ICE from using the software they were working on by adding more terms thereby changing the license. I think one example was done unilaterally by a single person who wasn't the copyright holder.
On this topic I saw an interesting post here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26633391 about the FSF situation being a coup. I agree with it.
They don't understand "free as in freedom" it seems.
Nevertheless, they want to force the FSF to do what they demand with the help of corporations that are financially blackmailing the foundation.
Ironic and very suited for the leftards, as always.
I agree with that post, they just fabricated the perfect excuse to nuke the board of directors and plant their own men in their place.
It's a cult.
Spot on as always
Rased and Bedpilled