Somewhere between theocrat and alt right troll. Probably a line from one to the other.
Theocracy is just people realizing that 99% of life is bullshit, and only a few select actions/ways of living are prudent. This is a harsh lesson we're going to be learning in our and future generations as more and more people live the way they want/think they should and end up miserable. 10 years ago roughly 20% of women over 40 in the west were single and childless. Recently I've read an article stating that this number is projected to be nearly 50% by 2030. Many women are and will be waking up to a miserable existence realizing it's too late for them to have kids, and they'll probably never find a decent man now that they're old and infertile. This is going to be a living hell for people, and hence why we see an uptick in suicides for women in that age range. It's only an example but many people are making mistakes like this in their lives and not realizing the consequences until it's too late.
The anti simp because simps destroy women and society.
The constitutional monarchist because only a few people are actually smart enough to rule, the issue is figuring out who and how to get them to do it. Holding them responsible the ways the ancients did might be a good way.
And the troll because trolling is fun. Also great way to spread the truth without actually having people be aware of what you're doing.
Minarchist. We need about 1% of the government and 1% of the laws we currently have (just the basic shit to protect life and property). The rest of the laws are either useless or harmful, and the people who make them are raging assholes who are a net drain on society.
I've lost all hope of a peaceful solution to the globalist/communist alliance, and I've come to believe that the sooner shit hits the fan, the better my personal chances are of coming out alive on the other side of it.
I'd unironically blanket China with 30% of the entire NATO nuclear arsenal right now if I had access to the button.
Nearest see the end of Escape From LA when Snake Plissken activates the world code for the Damocles satellite network and shuts down all technology across the planet?
Alright, sit down, you little psycho. Just because your sick little country is dying and tearing itself apart, doesn't mean you should take the rest of the world with you.
I'd say I'm the average of the cowboy and the anti socialist. Which puts me right around the billionaire and the libertarian area. So, yeah that's about right. Although I'm going to have to build a wall to my left, as there's no way in hell I'm shifting to anything with rainbow hair or chick from a zombie movie. Mafia boss, that's fine.
The Minarchist feels about right, barring a sharp spike up to The Monarchist every 1st and 15th because I work a little too closely with the general public.
Constitutional monarchist. Because power structures will form naturally.
I will use guns as an example- if we ban all or most guns, that doesn't mean guns go away. It just means that the only people with guns will be those that don't care about the law.
If we eliminate most or all government, the power structure doesn't go away. it will simply be filled by someone who cares more about power than about liberty.
Elections are bad 1) because the average person is easily manipulated and uneducated in politics or history, and 2) having frequent changes in administration makes it much harder to carry out long-term projects or programs.
Having the leadership be bound to a specific set of rules to prevent them from being tyrants is simple logic, hence "constitutional" monarchy
Having a monarchy makes sense, as basically the entire royal family would be trained from birth to rule, with a clear and public line of succession. So, if whoever was the designated monarch was physically/mentally unfit to rule, they could be replaced by another qualified monarch without any messy civil wars or power struggles
it would also have the added benefit of the monarch being surrounded by educated and trustworthy advisors.
And the real reason for a lifetime leadership appointment is that, without a constant need to worry about re-election, it becomes possible for leaders to do what is best for the long-term interests of the nation, even if that is not the most popular option, and completely removes the lobbying and corporate interests that have so thoroughly fucked the modern system
And they would be bound by the Constitution to not be repressive dickwads, while simultaneously being actually educated and able to implement intelligent policies.
Son, I am disappoint.
The Anti Socialist looks pretty damn close.
Somewhere between theocrat and alt right troll. Probably a line from one to the other.
Theocracy is just people realizing that 99% of life is bullshit, and only a few select actions/ways of living are prudent. This is a harsh lesson we're going to be learning in our and future generations as more and more people live the way they want/think they should and end up miserable. 10 years ago roughly 20% of women over 40 in the west were single and childless. Recently I've read an article stating that this number is projected to be nearly 50% by 2030. Many women are and will be waking up to a miserable existence realizing it's too late for them to have kids, and they'll probably never find a decent man now that they're old and infertile. This is going to be a living hell for people, and hence why we see an uptick in suicides for women in that age range. It's only an example but many people are making mistakes like this in their lives and not realizing the consequences until it's too late.
The anti simp because simps destroy women and society.
The constitutional monarchist because only a few people are actually smart enough to rule, the issue is figuring out who and how to get them to do it. Holding them responsible the ways the ancients did might be a good way.
And the troll because trolling is fun. Also great way to spread the truth without actually having people be aware of what you're doing.
Minarchist. We need about 1% of the government and 1% of the laws we currently have (just the basic shit to protect life and property). The rest of the laws are either useless or harmful, and the people who make them are raging assholes who are a net drain on society.
Imma go with this.
The 4chan user and the accelerationist.
I've lost all hope of a peaceful solution to the globalist/communist alliance, and I've come to believe that the sooner shit hits the fan, the better my personal chances are of coming out alive on the other side of it.
I'd unironically blanket China with 30% of the entire NATO nuclear arsenal right now if I had access to the button.
NATO is the cancer, not China.
https://twitter.com/NATO/status/1366355680681209859
I said I'd like to use 30% of NATO's arsenal. I didn't say anything about the people running NATO, or the other 60%.
Nearest see the end of Escape From LA when Snake Plissken activates the world code for the Damocles satellite network and shuts down all technology across the planet?
Yeah, I would totally do that in a heartbeat.
Alright, sit down, you little psycho. Just because your sick little country is dying and tearing itself apart, doesn't mean you should take the rest of the world with you.
Choose your fighter!
Love how the republican and the democrat are the same haha.
The "nam, Veteran". Because, initially, I read it as HAM veteran. I love ham, and I will fight for it.
I feel personally attacked.
I'd say I'm the average of the cowboy and the anti socialist. Which puts me right around the billionaire and the libertarian area. So, yeah that's about right. Although I'm going to have to build a wall to my left, as there's no way in hell I'm shifting to anything with rainbow hair or chick from a zombie movie. Mafia boss, that's fine.
The anti-simp, I suppose. None of them really describe me that well.
The nationalist.
The Minarchist feels about right, barring a sharp spike up to The Monarchist every 1st and 15th because I work a little too closely with the general public.
Constitutional monarchist. Because power structures will form naturally.
I will use guns as an example- if we ban all or most guns, that doesn't mean guns go away. It just means that the only people with guns will be those that don't care about the law.
If we eliminate most or all government, the power structure doesn't go away. it will simply be filled by someone who cares more about power than about liberty.
Elections are bad 1) because the average person is easily manipulated and uneducated in politics or history, and 2) having frequent changes in administration makes it much harder to carry out long-term projects or programs.
Having the leadership be bound to a specific set of rules to prevent them from being tyrants is simple logic, hence "constitutional" monarchy
Having a monarchy makes sense, as basically the entire royal family would be trained from birth to rule, with a clear and public line of succession. So, if whoever was the designated monarch was physically/mentally unfit to rule, they could be replaced by another qualified monarch without any messy civil wars or power struggles
it would also have the added benefit of the monarch being surrounded by educated and trustworthy advisors.
And the real reason for a lifetime leadership appointment is that, without a constant need to worry about re-election, it becomes possible for leaders to do what is best for the long-term interests of the nation, even if that is not the most popular option, and completely removes the lobbying and corporate interests that have so thoroughly fucked the modern system
And they would be bound by the Constitution to not be repressive dickwads, while simultaneously being actually educated and able to implement intelligent policies.
Well, I'm neither but I would love to be either "the cowboy" or "the redeck"
I am too complex for any one label. The depths of my personality and knowledge are unlike any.......... what? Ok, coming Mom...