Constitutional monarchist. Because power structures will form naturally.
I will use guns as an example- if we ban all or most guns, that doesn't mean guns go away. It just means that the only people with guns will be those that don't care about the law.
If we eliminate most or all government, the power structure doesn't go away. it will simply be filled by someone who cares more about power than about liberty.
Elections are bad 1) because the average person is easily manipulated and uneducated in politics or history, and 2) having frequent changes in administration makes it much harder to carry out long-term projects or programs.
Having the leadership be bound to a specific set of rules to prevent them from being tyrants is simple logic, hence "constitutional" monarchy
Having a monarchy makes sense, as basically the entire royal family would be trained from birth to rule, with a clear and public line of succession. So, if whoever was the designated monarch was physically/mentally unfit to rule, they could be replaced by another qualified monarch without any messy civil wars or power struggles
it would also have the added benefit of the monarch being surrounded by educated and trustworthy advisors.
And the real reason for a lifetime leadership appointment is that, without a constant need to worry about re-election, it becomes possible for leaders to do what is best for the long-term interests of the nation, even if that is not the most popular option, and completely removes the lobbying and corporate interests that have so thoroughly fucked the modern system
And they would be bound by the Constitution to not be repressive dickwads, while simultaneously being actually educated and able to implement intelligent policies.
Constitutional monarchist. Because power structures will form naturally.
I will use guns as an example- if we ban all or most guns, that doesn't mean guns go away. It just means that the only people with guns will be those that don't care about the law.
If we eliminate most or all government, the power structure doesn't go away. it will simply be filled by someone who cares more about power than about liberty.
Elections are bad 1) because the average person is easily manipulated and uneducated in politics or history, and 2) having frequent changes in administration makes it much harder to carry out long-term projects or programs.
Having the leadership be bound to a specific set of rules to prevent them from being tyrants is simple logic, hence "constitutional" monarchy
Having a monarchy makes sense, as basically the entire royal family would be trained from birth to rule, with a clear and public line of succession. So, if whoever was the designated monarch was physically/mentally unfit to rule, they could be replaced by another qualified monarch without any messy civil wars or power struggles
it would also have the added benefit of the monarch being surrounded by educated and trustworthy advisors.
And the real reason for a lifetime leadership appointment is that, without a constant need to worry about re-election, it becomes possible for leaders to do what is best for the long-term interests of the nation, even if that is not the most popular option, and completely removes the lobbying and corporate interests that have so thoroughly fucked the modern system
And they would be bound by the Constitution to not be repressive dickwads, while simultaneously being actually educated and able to implement intelligent policies.