Obviously, it's best to not play their semantic game, as it accepts their framing.
However, if you have to play, poison the well by insisting on "biotypical" rather than "cis" as a frame. "Biotypical" should be our "preferred" self-label because it's got the same pseudoscience feel to it, just like "neruotypical" (an 'in' phrase to describe "normal" by mentally ill wokists) and is a subtle dig at transgenderism flying in the face of biology.
(Man. You're not wrong, yet I must rant. Please forgive what follows, none of it is directed at you, it's about me being fed up with trans shit.)
I really hate slang use of 'x-phobic' to indicate 'bigoted against x.' (I wish these people just would come out and say that, instead!)
People aren't molecules and this isn't chemistry. I mislike 'cis' for the same reasons. I don't make a habit of torturing language and I hate PC neologisms.
Strictly speaking, the psychiatric definition of a phobia is: "an an abnormal, intense, and irrational fear of a given situation, organism, or object." Note the AND conjunction of these three indicators.
That definition fails on its face when someone yells "transphobe!" at me.
There's nothing irrational about my distaste for transgenderism, nor do I suffer any fear of trans people. There's no intensity, either. Mine is general low-key disgust, coupled with an understanding that the person is likely to be unbalanced if they are taking opposite-sex hormones. (Basically, second puberty!) Definitionally, suffering sex dysphoria is a mental illness that is being enabled by people too afraid to contradict someone who is not of sound mind. I have some sympathy for the underlying condition, but refuse to enable someone who is mentally ill.
The world has too many Yanivs and transtrenders already..
(Yeah, I'm not well adapted to the clown world. But being well-adapted to a sick society makes you sick yourself... so I'll try to stay healthy.)
This is one of the more impressive accomplishments of the left. They've managed to normalize all of their mental illnesses while pathologizing any worldview that does not actively participate in the aforementioned normalization.
It's called "being a normal human."
and remember to stand your ground against using their language, never say "cis" or "straight" say normal or regular
they are desperately trying to shed the negative connotation that normal people feel when considering those fetishes
if you can get away with it then bring back degenerate as well, its such an appropriate description
Obviously, it's best to not play their semantic game, as it accepts their framing.
However, if you have to play, poison the well by insisting on "biotypical" rather than "cis" as a frame. "Biotypical" should be our "preferred" self-label because it's got the same pseudoscience feel to it, just like "neruotypical" (an 'in' phrase to describe "normal" by mentally ill wokists) and is a subtle dig at transgenderism flying in the face of biology.
In chemistry -phobia means repelled by.
(Man. You're not wrong, yet I must rant. Please forgive what follows, none of it is directed at you, it's about me being fed up with trans shit.)
I really hate slang use of 'x-phobic' to indicate 'bigoted against x.' (I wish these people just would come out and say that, instead!)
People aren't molecules and this isn't chemistry. I mislike 'cis' for the same reasons. I don't make a habit of torturing language and I hate PC neologisms.
Strictly speaking, the psychiatric definition of a phobia is: "an an abnormal, intense, and irrational fear of a given situation, organism, or object." Note the AND conjunction of these three indicators.
That definition fails on its face when someone yells "transphobe!" at me.
There's nothing irrational about my distaste for transgenderism, nor do I suffer any fear of trans people. There's no intensity, either. Mine is general low-key disgust, coupled with an understanding that the person is likely to be unbalanced if they are taking opposite-sex hormones. (Basically, second puberty!) Definitionally, suffering sex dysphoria is a mental illness that is being enabled by people too afraid to contradict someone who is not of sound mind. I have some sympathy for the underlying condition, but refuse to enable someone who is mentally ill.
The world has too many Yanivs and transtrenders already..
(Yeah, I'm not well adapted to the clown world. But being well-adapted to a sick society makes you sick yourself... so I'll try to stay healthy.)
if you want to completely butcher language transtaedia works well enough
translates to "bored of" or "disgusted by" depending on
This is one of the more impressive accomplishments of the left. They've managed to normalize all of their mental illnesses while pathologizing any worldview that does not actively participate in the aforementioned normalization.
Much like Carlos "Gay Wonk" Maza, those guys refer to themselves as mentally ill, trans, demons, and hackers. Just not all in the same sentence.
fake concept. reject the premise.
Based department calling.