So you could have read the actual bill, and pointed out something if it is in there, but instead you decided to forgo any of that icky stuff called 'research' and make claims based on nothing other than your usual screaming about "WOOOOOOOOOOMEN"?
this is a right wing political forum that exists because reddit deemed it too spicy. naturally, the population here is going to be right wingers of a slightly more spicy variety
Yeah, I could definitely see it as being a ploy, but it isn’t unreasonable to think of the bill as representative of how much feminism has lost control of its monster. Women don’t deserve protection from the destruction they created. If hell is freezing over, then at least women are also getting chills. It won’t redpill normies, but if it causes them to suffer, then so be it.
Assuming females are higher than troons on the stack? Troons have and will continue to divide the feminists and then slap them with their lady dicks in all aspects of society without consequence, it's why most feminists are terfs.....the only thing that can stop them is chicks with dicks and they know it.
Looks like a bumbling attempt to clarify and expand the existing 1964 Civil Rights Act. Ironically, most of the bullshit they want in is already covered by the original act as written (not that the idiots who wrote this would know... I am certain none of the drafters ever actually worked the litigation side of things). Not a big fan of the added pozzed bs to the language though. Overall, this looks to just be bullshit for bullshit's sake. I wouldn't worry until it is much further along the legislative process (the congress.gov site has a tracker).
Well, what's buried in it? Are you speculating, or have you found and read the actual bill?
So you could have read the actual bill, and pointed out something if it is in there, but instead you decided to forgo any of that icky stuff called 'research' and make claims based on nothing other than your usual screaming about "WOOOOOOOOOOMEN"?
How marvelous. Peak TheImpossible1.
what a fucking sperg
where do you actually think you are? why do you feel the need to defend feminists of all fucking people
of course it makes sense to question something that goes against everything they've been doing and saying for the past whatever years
No idea at all. Why don't you tell me about it?
I don't. But to rub off feminist morons on women as a group is pretty ridiculous.
this is a right wing political forum that exists because reddit deemed it too spicy. naturally, the population here is going to be right wingers of a slightly more spicy variety
This isn't a right-wing forum though.
I found it in 30 seconds.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5/text
That may have been above my usual level of hostility, but on your part that was above your usual level of BS.
Yeah, I could definitely see it as being a ploy, but it isn’t unreasonable to think of the bill as representative of how much feminism has lost control of its monster. Women don’t deserve protection from the destruction they created. If hell is freezing over, then at least women are also getting chills. It won’t redpill normies, but if it causes them to suffer, then so be it.
How many times have I gotta tell you, old man?
Jewish in-group preference will always trump female in-group preference.
Assuming females are higher than troons on the stack? Troons have and will continue to divide the feminists and then slap them with their lady dicks in all aspects of society without consequence, it's why most feminists are terfs.....the only thing that can stop them is chicks with dicks and they know it.
Looks like a bumbling attempt to clarify and expand the existing 1964 Civil Rights Act. Ironically, most of the bullshit they want in is already covered by the original act as written (not that the idiots who wrote this would know... I am certain none of the drafters ever actually worked the litigation side of things). Not a big fan of the added pozzed bs to the language though. Overall, this looks to just be bullshit for bullshit's sake. I wouldn't worry until it is much further along the legislative process (the congress.gov site has a tracker).
Ok. Looks like it is through the house. Now is the time to worry.