Speaking of gender theory, I have some good news I've recently found out, Romania has a new party that no one has heard off or at least it was completely ignored by the media, called AUR (translates to gold).
It got 9% of the votes which is huge for a new party, without a proper campaign and little money is now part of the parliament.
It campaigned on facebook and I think twitter and most of voting base being young people bellow 35, so double-nice
. It also had huge support from Romanians that live in other countries which is like 2 million Romanians. What happened was that Romanians abroad have seen what marxism and political correctness did to the west and decided to vote against it.
AUR has a specific platform: anti-marxism and anti-gender theory. There was an attempt to smear it as racist but the founder is or at least looks like of gypsy origins.
It also has a platform pro family unit and pro religious values as the foundation of Romanian traditions.
It did not matter that they mentioned they have no connection to the ortodox church and they do not actually support the church but they acknowledge the influence religion had on culture and the desire to preserve it. They even said they are not against same sex marriage but are for the encouraging of the traditional family since it actually increases the number of citizens. That did not stop the press to label them as homophobic alt-right extremist that want to go back to the middle ages. It did not help that they wanted to open the economy early.
Simion has also been part of several controversies such as the accessing with the help of the AUR of two former soldiers that are alleged to have repressed the revolutionaries
Based
Spez: I realized the party has two leaders, and I don't know enough about gyps to tell which one is more gypy.
Seriously. Their families are as tight as they come. It's the same in any group of people who form nomadic communities. The only way you can survive like that is if you can always depend on eachother.
The Romanian Revolution, from my eyes, is a really amazing feat of the people genuinely getting tired of authoritarian shit and just going all for it. However, the Revolution appeared to have been betrayed immediately afterwards. Romania needs some genuine anti-Leftist politics to help it out.
Soon after the revolution they got stuck with the social democratic party, which was almost as bad.
The bad part of the revolution is that the Romanian people see in EU a form of fighting against the corruption and authoritarianism inside their own country. But EU is also a globalist shithole that wants to destroy any resemblance of European culture and the average guy will never see this part until it is to late.
The good part is that Romanians are poor, a quarter of the native population have an outhouse. So that makes them less appealing to migrants. I give them about a decade before they get hit hard by the globalists.
I mean, IIRC, the military were the ones who conducted the massacre at Timișoara, but were also the ones that executed Ceaușescu. Then a bunch of the military apparatus took over the government after his execution. The Revolution succeeded in overthrowing the dictator, but not upending the government's structure. The Romanian establishment just got caught with their thumb up their dick. It's still a win, but it's not a total victory. Few revolutions are.
As for the EU, massive centralized bodies like that depend on authoritarianism and corruption in order to maintain control. So unfortunately, hoping the EU will clear up corruption is like hoping the Mob ends crime. They only way they do that is by monopolizing it.
They only got away with something like that because they are (or were) unknown. Something like campaigning on facebook is a one time thing. Zuck is going to ensure that the same thing won't work twice.
..."gender ideology" is a destructive force and totalitarian ideology, worse than Communism or Nazism. This is allegedly pushed by a secret cabal or foreign entities (such as the European Union, World Health Organization, or United Nations) for the purpose of weakening, undermining, or destroying families, the Catholic Church, the nation, or Western civilization.
Remove "allegedly" and it's just an everyday post on /pol/
These days, especially in America, boy-love is not only scandalous and criminal, but somehow in bad taste. On the evening news, one sees handcuffed teachers, priests and Boy Scout leaders hustled into police vans. Therapists call them maladjusted, emotionally immature. But beauty has its own laws, inconsistent with Christian morality. As a woman, I feel free to protest that men today are pilloried for something that was rational and honorable in Greece at the height of its civilization.
-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae
any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate sit in somebody's lap or engage in sexual activity.
-Pat Califia, cited in Sexual Investigations by Soble
This notion of consent is a trap, in any case. What is sure is that the legal form of an intersexual consent is nonsense. No one signs a contract before making love... When we say that children are 'consenting' in these cases, all we intend to say is this: in any case, there was no violence, or organized manipulation in order to wrench out of them affective or erotic relations.
-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory
But pederasty is probably historically the most common form of homosexuality in Western culture, as well as many other cultures. It exists in all cultures, and in some is considered the norm, even today (e.g., Iran, among the Pashtuns). To label it 'child abuse' or 'child molestation' is preposterous and stupid.
-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"
It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.
If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual ... then I would not call it pathological in any way.
-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.
But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Other notable globohomo clergy:
Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.
Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.
Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".
Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.
Pedowood is just the tip of pomochomo media:
Victor Salva's rape of his 12 year old actor is defended by intelligensia allies like John Edgar Browning.
Wikipedia is more pozzed than Charlie Sheen:
Rodney Reedraped a 12 year old and wikipedia covered it up for Shaun King's BLM bullshit.
tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.
The precise theory may be traced back to Dr John Money (1921-2006), a New Zealand psychologist who worked in the United States after the Second World War. He claimed that nurture not nature determines our sexual identity, that is, how you are raised and conditioned not the nature of your body. According to behaviourist theory, someone born as a boy could be turned into a girl by being raised as a girl – as long as he/she was never informed of his/her true sex.
Money also created the scourge of "transgenderism" which has now been unleashed upon Western civilization:
All stemming from the conceit that Man somehow isn't an animal but rather some higher order of being that is "free" from "animal" things like genes because "brain so big" nonsense.
I've actually had this discussion with a good friend of mine. He believes that we are somehow so removed from animal that biology can be ignored and at the same time he can't figure out why he is constantly depressed. He is a good guy but tends to be on the hippy side with lots of meditation and weed wisdom.
Transgenderism is older than John Money's horrible experiments, it dates at least as far back as the 1920s to Magnus Hirschfeld's "Institute of Sexual Health" in the Weimar Republic. The books Nazis burned were from there and full of batshit insane degeneracy.
The anti-gender movement is an international movement which opposes what it refers to as "gender ideology", "gender theory", or "genderism".[1] These concepts do not have a coherent definition
I'll give you a coherent definition: If it thinks sex and gender aren't synonyms, then it ultimately comes from Dr. Money and it belongs in a garbage pile.
Note how, what was once normal mainstream is now described in adversarial methods.
Despite being the accepted norm and their attempts to seperate gender from sex being the actual movement, they phrase their movement and ideology as normal and the actual normal as an anti movement.
Darvo at its finest. They can now cite this wikipedia article, which barely cites the media.... Who.. Got this where... From the fringe ideology trying to normalise itself.
Wikipedia has an article that’s thousands of words long about gender studies.
This is just more of the same nonsense we’re seeing with the “great reset” and countless other things. They deny it exists to deboonk anyone who disagrees while simultaneously pushing for it.
Interesting snippet from the talk page as well - one of the editors has queried what they clearly see as a biased source, the response, in part, is:
only the content of reliable sources is. (And reliable sources need not be "neutral" or "impartial".)
So, we only allow in things with the stamp of ideological conformity reliability, and once we've deemed it ideologically compliant reliable, it can be as biased as it wants to be!
Speaking of gender theory, I have some good news I've recently found out, Romania has a new party that no one has heard off or at least it was completely ignored by the media, called AUR (translates to gold).
It got 9% of the votes which is huge for a new party, without a proper campaign and little money is now part of the parliament. It campaigned on facebook and I think twitter and most of voting base being young people bellow 35, so double-nice . It also had huge support from Romanians that live in other countries which is like 2 million Romanians. What happened was that Romanians abroad have seen what marxism and political correctness did to the west and decided to vote against it.
AUR has a specific platform: anti-marxism and anti-gender theory. There was an attempt to smear it as racist but the founder is or at least looks like of gypsy origins. It also has a platform pro family unit and pro religious values as the foundation of Romanian traditions. It did not matter that they mentioned they have no connection to the ortodox church and they do not actually support the church but they acknowledge the influence religion had on culture and the desire to preserve it. They even said they are not against same sex marriage but are for the encouraging of the traditional family since it actually increases the number of citizens. That did not stop the press to label them as homophobic alt-right extremist that want to go back to the middle ages. It did not help that they wanted to open the economy early.
Still, I'm happy that they exist.
I'm not surprised a gyp is pro-family.
From his wiki:
Based
Spez: I realized the party has two leaders, and I don't know enough about gyps to tell which one is more gypy.
Seriously. Their families are as tight as they come. It's the same in any group of people who form nomadic communities. The only way you can survive like that is if you can always depend on eachother.
The Romanian Revolution, from my eyes, is a really amazing feat of the people genuinely getting tired of authoritarian shit and just going all for it. However, the Revolution appeared to have been betrayed immediately afterwards. Romania needs some genuine anti-Leftist politics to help it out.
Romania is part of the EU. As such it will be infested with globalist money and influence. I would not hold out hope for them.
Yes, but Vee is the leader of the Alt-Right, so he will lead a based Paleo-Reactionary Revolution.
Soon after the revolution they got stuck with the social democratic party, which was almost as bad. The bad part of the revolution is that the Romanian people see in EU a form of fighting against the corruption and authoritarianism inside their own country. But EU is also a globalist shithole that wants to destroy any resemblance of European culture and the average guy will never see this part until it is to late. The good part is that Romanians are poor, a quarter of the native population have an outhouse. So that makes them less appealing to migrants. I give them about a decade before they get hit hard by the globalists.
I mean, IIRC, the military were the ones who conducted the massacre at Timișoara, but were also the ones that executed Ceaușescu. Then a bunch of the military apparatus took over the government after his execution. The Revolution succeeded in overthrowing the dictator, but not upending the government's structure. The Romanian establishment just got caught with their thumb up their dick. It's still a win, but it's not a total victory. Few revolutions are.
As for the EU, massive centralized bodies like that depend on authoritarianism and corruption in order to maintain control. So unfortunately, hoping the EU will clear up corruption is like hoping the Mob ends crime. They only way they do that is by monopolizing it.
They only got away with something like that because they are (or were) unknown. Something like campaigning on facebook is a one time thing. Zuck is going to ensure that the same thing won't work twice.
This article is hilarious.
Remove "allegedly" and it's just an everyday post on /pol/
Talk about a Freudian Slip.
Then again Freud was a cock-obsessed weirdo best kept far far away from the children and serious psychological discussion.
The only thing that's false in that statement is that it's a "secret cabal".
There's nothing secret about it. The Fabians stopped being Fabian.
Bill de Blasio put pedos next to elementary schools. The Tavistock Clinic was doing mass medical tranny experimentation on children, but was fortunately slapped down recently by reactionary judges. In Germany, Dr Kentler gave foster kids to pedos, and green movement founder Daniel Cohn-Bendit bragged about a child sex daycare. Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:
-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae
-Pat Califia, cited in Sexual Investigations by Soble
-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory
-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.
-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Other notable globohomo clergy:
Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.
Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.
Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".
Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.
Pedowood is just the tip of pomochomo media:
Victor Salva's rape of his 12 year old actor is defended by intelligensia allies like John Edgar Browning.
Wikipedia is more pozzed than Charlie Sheen:
Rodney Reed raped a 12 year old and wikipedia covered it up for Shaun King's BLM bullshit.
tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.
Child molesting(chomo) post modernist(pomo), I thought it was obvious to this esoterically inclined audience of faggots.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money
The only wikipedia article you need to know how fucking horrific gender theory actually is.
InfoGalatic is way better than the lefty shithole that is Wikipedia.
https://infogalactic.com/info/John_Money
It's so tempting to add certain things here.
Specifically things that question how feminism can be anti-gender while also defining who lives and dies by their gender according to their manifesto.
...
We should definitely use "Women's Rights" to advocate against circumcision.
MRAs rebrand as pro transwoman activists and actually make progress
The sad thing is, it would probably work better.
Feminists are anti-gender. Specifically the male gender.
A sick bastard named Dr. John Money created specious notion of gender theory:
https://www.faith.org.uk/article/gender-theory-and-gender-ideology
The precise theory may be traced back to Dr John Money (1921-2006), a New Zealand psychologist who worked in the United States after the Second World War. He claimed that nurture not nature determines our sexual identity, that is, how you are raised and conditioned not the nature of your body. According to behaviourist theory, someone born as a boy could be turned into a girl by being raised as a girl – as long as he/she was never informed of his/her true sex.
Money also created the scourge of "transgenderism" which has now been unleashed upon Western civilization:
https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/article/john-money-david-reimer-and-dark-origins-transgender-movement/
P.S. My pronouns are: GO FUCK YOURSELF
All stemming from the conceit that Man somehow isn't an animal but rather some higher order of being that is "free" from "animal" things like genes because "brain so big" nonsense.
I've actually had this discussion with a good friend of mine. He believes that we are somehow so removed from animal that biology can be ignored and at the same time he can't figure out why he is constantly depressed. He is a good guy but tends to be on the hippy side with lots of meditation and weed wisdom.
The Greeks warned about hubris; Man has it in spades on the species level.
Transgenderism is older than John Money's horrible experiments, it dates at least as far back as the 1920s to Magnus Hirschfeld's "Institute of Sexual Health" in the Weimar Republic. The books Nazis burned were from there and full of batshit insane degeneracy.
I'll give you a coherent definition: If it thinks sex and gender aren't synonyms, then it ultimately comes from Dr. Money and it belongs in a garbage pile.
ctrl+f "john money" 0 results
Note how, what was once normal mainstream is now described in adversarial methods.
Despite being the accepted norm and their attempts to seperate gender from sex being the actual movement, they phrase their movement and ideology as normal and the actual normal as an anti movement.
Darvo at its finest. They can now cite this wikipedia article, which barely cites the media.... Who.. Got this where... From the fringe ideology trying to normalise itself.
Wikipedia has an article that’s thousands of words long about gender studies.
This is just more of the same nonsense we’re seeing with the “great reset” and countless other things. They deny it exists to deboonk anyone who disagrees while simultaneously pushing for it.
Interesting snippet from the talk page as well - one of the editors has queried what they clearly see as a biased source, the response, in part, is:
So, we only allow in things with the stamp of
ideological conformityreliability, and once we've deemed itideologically compliantreliable, it can be as biased as it wants to be!