I doubt it. Glowies need precious little to generate an over-whelming response. You just don't need severe damage when you're an establishment force. It also undermines the argument that you can protect the public.
There's no way that a bomb of that magnitude was supposed to detonate in an empty street like that with no one present. That was supposed to take down a building. It's possible that it went off early on it's way to a target.
It seems fairly obvious to me that it was a genuine attempt at a terrorist attack, but without a clear target, and without anyone taking responsibility, it's hard to tell who.
No, but for realz. Apparently the VBIED was playing a warning for people to evacuate the area. That's really odd behavior for your average terrorist or activist.
Probably not Islamic terrorism - while a car bomb on Christmas fits their MO, bombing the AT&T building on the one day a year when it is least likely to cause mass casualties does not.
If the attackers struck some sort of core networking infrastructure building it could be genuine international cyber-warfare. If it was just a retail store, then it's obviously something else.
Leftist Terrorism has been known to use bombings, but intentionally avoid mass civilian casualties. That's what they did to Sterling Hall back in the 1970s.
I wonder which of the usual suspects was behind this?
Glowies?
Religion of Peace?
Antifa?
Who knows it might even be the glowies trying to make sure protests like Stop the Steal and the DC protest on January 6th cannot happen.
Glowies have done false flags before.
Hell they stole this election, who knows where they would stop.
I doubt it. Glowies need precious little to generate an over-whelming response. You just don't need severe damage when you're an establishment force. It also undermines the argument that you can protect the public.
>glowies
>protecting anything but their pensions
Pffffffffffffffffttttttttttttt
Whoever it was, they missed.
There's no way that a bomb of that magnitude was supposed to detonate in an empty street like that with no one present. That was supposed to take down a building. It's possible that it went off early on it's way to a target.
It seems fairly obvious to me that it was a genuine attempt at a terrorist attack, but without a clear target, and without anyone taking responsibility, it's hard to tell who.
HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT!
No, but for realz. Apparently the VBIED was playing a warning for people to evacuate the area. That's really odd behavior for your average terrorist or activist.
Probably not Islamic terrorism - while a car bomb on Christmas fits their MO, bombing the AT&T building on the one day a year when it is least likely to cause mass casualties does not.
What kind of AT&T building was it?
If the attackers struck some sort of core networking infrastructure building it could be genuine international cyber-warfare. If it was just a retail store, then it's obviously something else.
Leftist Terrorism has been known to use bombings, but intentionally avoid mass civilian casualties. That's what they did to Sterling Hall back in the 1970s.
It was a switching center, so actual network infrastructure.
Hmmmmm
There are phone outages reported in Georgia. Election fraud related? What traffic was handled there and what was in the logs?