I want to pay specific attention to Steve Ballmer and his wife Connie. Steve is a career criminal who was a high-level executive at Microsoft when it was engaging in numerous violations of anti-trust law, sabotaging competition and establishing a monopoly - picking the pockets of ordinary people while making himself a multi-billionaire.
Somehow, he believes that being a robber baron entitles him to decide for us what our laws should be, in this case by attempting to flood the airwaves with propaganda in favor of racial discrimination against white people and Asians. For the record: the good guys have raised less than 10% of what the bad guys have, and 95% of the contributions have come from the notoriously white supremacist group known as Asians.
Anti-trust action is just another word for nationalization. The right should still use it if necessary to get out of clown world, but it is inherently socialist.
How? Which of the trusts and monopolists were nationalized after an anti-trust action? None. Rather, they were broken up, which anyone who opposes big government should oppose, because big corporations tyrannizing over you is no better.
The entire industry is brought under the control of government bureaucracies. Those new small companies are tightly controlled with executives moving freely between public and private sectors as if they were the same entity.
This seems more an objection against overzealous regulation than against anti-trust per se. There is nothing inherent in anti-trust that requires excessive and dumb regulation.
Also, right-wingers need to start considering that the completely unaccountable business community may be a greater foe to freedom than the government. At least there are some democratic controls on government. There are none on Twitter, Google and other election meddlers.
The buissnesses losing to the company targeted by anti-trust have a lot to gain, and the government will subsidize them. It can be good to get nationalized from executive perspectives. Their market share is enforced by law and losses are socialized.
This is one of the problems with health insurance. There’s no legitimate reason for 2 nonprofit insurers to give a combined 2 million dollars to this bullshit.
Why would the Teachers Association pay into this? Isn't education underfunded? Shouldn't they spend the money on that instead? Or they can just fart away all the money on lulzies and commie shit while demanding more because Muh Educayshon and the future and bullshit?
Some of these political organizations are effectively just Leftist organizations occupying a certain niche.
Raz0rfist described the "Red For Ed" movement, and they were seemingly normal teachers unions who were all emphatically supporting what amounted to a full socialist education program, lead by devout socialists & communists. The giant number of red flags and banners also kinda gave it away.
It's entirely possible that the California Teachers Association is a Leftist organization.
I want to pay specific attention to Steve Ballmer and his wife Connie. Steve is a career criminal who was a high-level executive at Microsoft when it was engaging in numerous violations of anti-trust law, sabotaging competition and establishing a monopoly - picking the pockets of ordinary people while making himself a multi-billionaire.
Somehow, he believes that being a robber baron entitles him to decide for us what our laws should be, in this case by attempting to flood the airwaves with propaganda in favor of racial discrimination against white people and Asians. For the record: the good guys have raised less than 10% of what the bad guys have, and 95% of the contributions have come from the notoriously white supremacist group known as Asians.
Anti-trust action is just another word for nationalization. The right should still use it if necessary to get out of clown world, but it is inherently socialist.
How? Which of the trusts and monopolists were nationalized after an anti-trust action? None. Rather, they were broken up, which anyone who opposes big government should oppose, because big corporations tyrannizing over you is no better.
The entire industry is brought under the control of government bureaucracies. Those new small companies are tightly controlled with executives moving freely between public and private sectors as if they were the same entity.
This seems more an objection against overzealous regulation than against anti-trust per se. There is nothing inherent in anti-trust that requires excessive and dumb regulation.
Also, right-wingers need to start considering that the completely unaccountable business community may be a greater foe to freedom than the government. At least there are some democratic controls on government. There are none on Twitter, Google and other election meddlers.
The buissnesses losing to the company targeted by anti-trust have a lot to gain, and the government will subsidize them. It can be good to get nationalized from executive perspectives. Their market share is enforced by law and losses are socialized.
L O fucking L
No shit.
ACLU supports explicit racialism.
honk honk
looks at picture
sigh why?
She looks like a Herman... Herman Munster.
This is one of the problems with health insurance. There’s no legitimate reason for 2 nonprofit insurers to give a combined 2 million dollars to this bullshit.
Why would the Teachers Association pay into this? Isn't education underfunded? Shouldn't they spend the money on that instead? Or they can just fart away all the money on lulzies and commie shit while demanding more because Muh Educayshon and the future and bullshit?
Some of these political organizations are effectively just Leftist organizations occupying a certain niche.
Raz0rfist described the "Red For Ed" movement, and they were seemingly normal teachers unions who were all emphatically supporting what amounted to a full socialist education program, lead by devout socialists & communists. The giant number of red flags and banners also kinda gave it away.
It's entirely possible that the California Teachers Association is a Leftist organization.
How many of your 24 hours do you spend not thinking about women?
X
Do you know of many people - even the insane - who do not think that?
The Anti Civil Liberties Union strikes again.
Wait, is this the same Delaney? If so... wooooow
Good question. I only know ACLU and Steve Ballsack.
Hmmm.