The entire industry is brought under the control of government bureaucracies. Those new small companies are tightly controlled with executives moving freely between public and private sectors as if they were the same entity.
This seems more an objection against overzealous regulation than against anti-trust per se. There is nothing inherent in anti-trust that requires excessive and dumb regulation.
Also, right-wingers need to start considering that the completely unaccountable business community may be a greater foe to freedom than the government. At least there are some democratic controls on government. There are none on Twitter, Google and other election meddlers.
The buissnesses losing to the company targeted by anti-trust have a lot to gain, and the government will subsidize them. It can be good to get nationalized from executive perspectives. Their market share is enforced by law and losses are socialized.
The entire industry is brought under the control of government bureaucracies. Those new small companies are tightly controlled with executives moving freely between public and private sectors as if they were the same entity.
This seems more an objection against overzealous regulation than against anti-trust per se. There is nothing inherent in anti-trust that requires excessive and dumb regulation.
Also, right-wingers need to start considering that the completely unaccountable business community may be a greater foe to freedom than the government. At least there are some democratic controls on government. There are none on Twitter, Google and other election meddlers.
The buissnesses losing to the company targeted by anti-trust have a lot to gain, and the government will subsidize them. It can be good to get nationalized from executive perspectives. Their market share is enforced by law and losses are socialized.