Reset the clock, there's another questionable manifesto from a woman.
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (55)
sorted by:
If she hates men so much why is she trying to look like one
Just like with men trying to look like women, it's hard to compete with the real thing.
The dried out, cobwebby lesbian thinks other women would suddenly want her if the ebil ebil men didn't steal them. Yeah right, bitch, because we would want someone who looks kinda like the men, but is weaker, has no dick, is more emotional, softer and just overall an inferior imitation. Right.
I mean sure, if someone is lesbian then fuck women, idc, but when I have a choice between a real burger or that Beyond Shit, I will not go with the fake that's worse.
There's a certain brand of lesbian that thinks straight girls are just brainwashed into liking men.
These are generally bitter women who never got over their first bad experience with a man, and retreated to political lesbianism. Dworkin and Solanas fit the mold.
I'll bet this woman is the same.
Sure, and gay men are actually all straight men who got diddled as a child. This "/pol/ Science" shit is exhausting. Not every gay person is a deranged freak or a victim of some trauma, it's just that the deranged freaks get pushed to the forefront by activists and opportunists.
Do you understand the difference between "all gay men became gay because of" and "no gay man became gay because of"?
Is that really a woman? Because those photos are not flattering. Why are all these insane rabid feminists complete dogs? Is the lack of male attention the reason they became rabid feminists?
It is indeed. Lesbians always look like that, it's a sort of outward manifestation of their hatred.
Clearly not, because she's a lesbian. I think it's more that lesbian culture is built strongly around the whole kill all men propaganda, so to get attention from them, you have to be more hateful towards men to impress them.
Yes, from their dad.
"We have to erase men ... They're way better at my aesthetic than me and I need less competition."
Holy shit...that's weirdly accurate.
Well, Logan Paul looks like Roid-Ellen, so it's not surprising.
It should not be illegal for people to have stupid ideas, because then most of the population would be in jail.
I didn't know Logan Paul was a lesbian.
Looks like Bo Burnham's going through some stuff.
He's a lot prettier than this person.
Is there such a thing as good looking lesbians? I know you see them on TV and movies, in really life though, they often seem ugly as sin. Which leads me to question the validity of their choices. It's much like the trans issue. Most of them are men pretending to be women, and they are usually very ugly men. I've yet to see a good looking guys whose went trans. Is everything these people do out of frustration and rebellion? It seems so.
Anyone know how to report a book that shouldn't be sold on Amazon?
This is madness. You want that billionaire crook Jeff Bezos to decide what books people are able to buy and read?
Amazon already does that. They frequently deplatform conservative authors in Germany. I'm not talking about anything that violates our hate speech laws but merely stuff that the left objects to.
All the more reason to put an end to Amazon and the rest of the tech giants.
They are enemies of freedom.
True, but while they exist you might as well make your opponents live by their own rules.
He already does, he pulled Elders of Zion, some things about race wars and a few others.
I just want her to get nothing out of her hatred.
This is something we should oppose, not enable.
Why would you want your enemy to get rich off writing books about how you shouldn't exist?
Because free speech?
They're allowed to say it, just not make money.
By what law are you not 'allowed' to make money off a work when you disapprove of it?
How many clocks do we have exactly?
Both too many and not enough.
There is no species on earth that should ever turn out like that thing did. It's time for the circle of life to make some grass, again.
I always remain impressed with your ability to spin anything into 'women are bad'.
In a parallel universe, you are a feminist and you post a 'questionable manifesto' from a man with the title "Reset the clock, there's another questionable manifesto from a white man." (because feminists always hate white men in particular)
I don't think I'm spinning anything, actually.
It is written by a woman, it is being bought and reviewed by women...
Do men even write "questionable manifestos"? Advocating for gender-based murder seems an exclusively female pursuit. Even the incels don't actually want to kill all women.
Honestly man, if you replaced "woman" with "feminist" I'd agree with damn near everything you post.
Yes, this grease-trap of a book was written by a woman, as the communist manifesto was written by a man. The problems in both cases are (to my mind) about ideology, not gender.
Feminists are female supremacists. The fact that female supremacists exist (and have near total control over media) does not mean that all women are female supremacists.
Amongst other things, when you conflate "woman" with "feminist" you are granting one of the feminist premises; that they speak for women - which they do not.
I get the anger, I get the frustration, I get the desire to treat feminists the way they treat you. But when you behave like them, you are giving them what they want.
For your own sake, you should learn to pity them more than you hate them. If you let the bile they spew make you a less-happy person, you are giving them a win.
Same for me.
Of all the questionable manifestos out there, which are not few, you picked this one specifically, and why? We all know why.
TheImpossible, meet Islam. Islam, meet TheImpossible.
It's small dog syndrome, in this case small bitch syndrome. We don't take them seriously, because they would hurt themselves more if they tried to punch a man. I am not saying to not bring to light their fantasies in order to discredit them (them = rabid feminist shrews), but please don't give any sort of legitimacy to their impotent rage.
What RFSs "want" is irrelevant. Let them rage themselves to death. Laugh at them instead of being terrified by these nothings.
Would you like me to post about every call for murder ever written? I could do that, and it would still be majority female writers.
Islam doesn't want to kill all women, they want to kill or convert all non-believers.
In a world where viruses can be engineered to target any characteristic, why would physical strength matter? If they really did want to kill us, they could do it.
Still waiting to hear what your point is. If you want to suggest that because most 'calls to murder' are from women, if true, establishes that women are bad, then surely you must think men are way worse because nearly all actual murders are committed by men.
You talked about gender-based murder. Plenty of that in the Religion of Peace.
Who are 'they'? Rabid feminist shrews are not genetic engineers, even assuming that such engineering is possible, practical and easy, they are single, bitter living in a 30m^2 Manhattan apartment smelling of cat piss and rotting Ben & Jerry's, and hoping to get an order for a 'thinkpiece' so they can ingest their daily allotment of 4000 calories.
My point is simply that this keeps being discussed in their circles. It's not simply a few weirdos ranting to each other out of anger. It never disappears as an idea, it's always still around.
You knew what I meant. Nobody says "kill all women" like feminists say "kill all men".
Well, that's the thing. Haven't we learned to stop underestimating them? If you are fighting against losers like that, how come you're losing? Clearly they have less obvious adherents to their ideology than the stereotypical ones.
Ok, now you've gone and done it. You're going to make me defend Islam. You fucking bastard.
Islam has rules for people to follow. If people don't follow those rules, they're subject to punishments, some of them including death.
Some of these rules are gender specific.
That is in no way comparable to someone writing about just killing all men or women.
Islam is stupid. It's not that stupid. Come on.
Comment Reported for: 16: Identity attacks
Comment Approved: This is not an identity attack