I always remain impressed with your ability to spin anything into 'women are bad'.
In a parallel universe, you are a feminist and you post a 'questionable manifesto' from a man with the title "Reset the clock, there's another questionable manifesto from a white man." (because feminists always hate white men in particular)
Honestly man, if you replaced "woman" with "feminist" I'd agree with damn near everything you post.
It is written by a feminist, it is being bought and reviewed by feminists...
Yes, this grease-trap of a book was written by a woman, as the communist manifesto was written by a man. The problems in both cases are (to my mind) about ideology, not gender.
Feminists are female supremacists. The fact that female supremacists exist (and have near total control over media) does not mean that all women are female supremacists.
Amongst other things, when you conflate "woman" with "feminist" you are granting one of the feminist premises; that they speak for women - which they do not.
I get the anger, I get the frustration, I get the desire to treat feminists the way they treat you. But when you behave like them, you are giving them what they want.
For your own sake, you should learn to pity them more than you hate them. If you let the bile they spew make you a less-happy person, you are giving them a win.
It is written by a woman, it is being bought and reviewed by women...
Of all the questionable manifestos out there, which are not few, you picked this one specifically, and why? We all know why.
Advocating for gender-based murder seems an exclusively female pursuit.
TheImpossible, meet Islam. Islam, meet TheImpossible.
Even the incels don't actually want to kill all women.
It's small dog syndrome, in this case small bitch syndrome. We don't take them seriously, because they would hurt themselves more if they tried to punch a man. I am not saying to not bring to light their fantasies in order to discredit them (them = rabid feminist shrews), but please don't give any sort of legitimacy to their impotent rage.
What RFSs "want" is irrelevant. Let them rage themselves to death. Laugh at them instead of being terrified by these nothings.
Would you like me to post about every call for murder ever written? I could do that, and it would still be majority female writers.
Still waiting to hear what your point is. If you want to suggest that because most 'calls to murder' are from women, if true, establishes that women are bad, then surely you must think men are way worse because nearly all actual murders are committed by men.
Islam doesn't want to kill all women, they want to kill or convert all non-believers.
You talked about gender-based murder. Plenty of that in the Religion of Peace.
In a world where viruses can be engineered to target any characteristic, why would physical strength matter? If they really did want to kill us, they could do it.
Who are 'they'? Rabid feminist shrews are not genetic engineers, even assuming that such engineering is possible, practical and easy, they are single, bitter living in a 30m^2 Manhattan apartment smelling of cat piss and rotting Ben & Jerry's, and hoping to get an order for a 'thinkpiece' so they can ingest their daily allotment of 4000 calories.
I always remain impressed with your ability to spin anything into 'women are bad'.
In a parallel universe, you are a feminist and you post a 'questionable manifesto' from a man with the title "Reset the clock, there's another questionable manifesto from a white man." (because feminists always hate white men in particular)
Comment Reported for: 16: Identity attacks
Comment Approved: This is not an identity attack
Honestly man, if you replaced "woman" with "feminist" I'd agree with damn near everything you post.
Yes, this grease-trap of a book was written by a woman, as the communist manifesto was written by a man. The problems in both cases are (to my mind) about ideology, not gender.
Feminists are female supremacists. The fact that female supremacists exist (and have near total control over media) does not mean that all women are female supremacists.
Amongst other things, when you conflate "woman" with "feminist" you are granting one of the feminist premises; that they speak for women - which they do not.
I get the anger, I get the frustration, I get the desire to treat feminists the way they treat you. But when you behave like them, you are giving them what they want.
For your own sake, you should learn to pity them more than you hate them. If you let the bile they spew make you a less-happy person, you are giving them a win.
Same for me.
Of all the questionable manifestos out there, which are not few, you picked this one specifically, and why? We all know why.
TheImpossible, meet Islam. Islam, meet TheImpossible.
It's small dog syndrome, in this case small bitch syndrome. We don't take them seriously, because they would hurt themselves more if they tried to punch a man. I am not saying to not bring to light their fantasies in order to discredit them (them = rabid feminist shrews), but please don't give any sort of legitimacy to their impotent rage.
What RFSs "want" is irrelevant. Let them rage themselves to death. Laugh at them instead of being terrified by these nothings.
Still waiting to hear what your point is. If you want to suggest that because most 'calls to murder' are from women, if true, establishes that women are bad, then surely you must think men are way worse because nearly all actual murders are committed by men.
You talked about gender-based murder. Plenty of that in the Religion of Peace.
Who are 'they'? Rabid feminist shrews are not genetic engineers, even assuming that such engineering is possible, practical and easy, they are single, bitter living in a 30m^2 Manhattan apartment smelling of cat piss and rotting Ben & Jerry's, and hoping to get an order for a 'thinkpiece' so they can ingest their daily allotment of 4000 calories.