Jordan Peterson doesn't have to conform to compelled speech. That was sort of how he got famous outside of his lectures on psychology.
If Jubliee told those self-admitted atheists they'd be speaking with a Christian then that's on them for misinforming these apparent 'free thinkers' about the situation.
I have no idea about Jordan Peterson's faith, except that he claims to have some, and would never have thought it would be as easy to pin down the most personal connection between man and existence on him for some freeloading militant theist to attack with cookie cutter complaints about their own upbringing.
The concepts of worship, celebrity and being within a group, are aspects I'd expect Jordan to tackle with a professional enough measure. His personal thoughts on the divine and his place in the universe are his personal thoughts and wouldn't have any place in his professional works.
The entire affair is just clickbait in my opinion.
That's the equivalent of £70 per living citizen of the UK.
Including children and pensioners.
A full day's paid work at minimum wage (Before tax).
Now taking into account some people can easily afford that, some can't work and so don't. The amount of minimum wage workers doing a week a year to pay for the accommodation of migrants might feel jarring to people who have just came out of 15 years of austerity, after the decade of the credit crunch, which followed "The Recession" which came after Thatcher's Britain and all of the strikes.
Just sayin'.
It's hard to want free speech when the peoples of your homeland heritage are genociding unarmed farmers and already advertising AirBnBs on their lands.
I didn't think anyone could make Hitler look good but I've got to say NuttingYahoo is doing a grand job of it.
I'm all about cobblers myself, but old rocks are cool.
I saw some star dust in the London Natural History Museum once, that was pretty humbling. In Buenos Aires they have a meteor on display in a public park, touching a space rock is also pretty nice ;)
coercing at-will employment
The other option is illegal.
As for the rest, I agree with Elon that it's a waste. But sadly it's a needed waste as this expenditure will reduce further erosion of an already sizeable debt incurred.
The big question is "If debt costs more than the military, why not send the military to those claiming money".
Apart from the aqueducts, sanitation, roads, irrigation, medicine, education, wine, public baths and peace. What have the Romans ever done for us?
The ones from Sicily I mean.
Yeah, the ones that were brought there by boat.
Yeah, against their will and by Arabic people, but still the true Romans.
The same guys that did Egypt.
You know, all the massively accepting homosexual friendly, equality between the genders and age indiscriminatory peoples - them.
Londinium wouldn't be nuffink wiffout dem.
That's my point.
Educate the Third World, let their best come and share their stories and that's how we all get better.
Kicking the offspring of those who died for that ability is not respectful of the lives given for what is available now.
Inverse colonialism needs to be halted.
Ah, the old comparison epiphany.
That's why so many black Americans have their tour of duty in Africa and then head on home to bad ol' racism and inequality.
Maybe if he flew himself out to India and some of the other places he'd see what an upgrade Canada is to them.
There's a reason people want to come to the West and benefit from all the hard work people have put into the land - and there's nothing wrong with that.
But neglecting the children of those who died for this prosperity is a kick in the face to civilisation.
Charity begins at home, it doesn't invite people in.
The irony here is palpable.
People died for you to have that opinion and express it.
I'm glad you get to use those freedoms to say what you want.
But I happen to disagree with a lot of what you say Telia, and that there's the rub.
At the moment 'trans activists' aren't fighting for their freedoms, they are asking for more than the average person.
That's simply exploitive criminal behaviour and should be met with reason and patience.
Give it ten years until all the "I was so wrong, why didn't anyone stop me!?!" stories come out while serial killing eunuchs murder innocent children by taking out their torture trauma on them.
All while CNN reports on what men could have done better, right after these messages sponsored by Pfizer ;)
Somebody should mention that the entire mainstream media called over half the country Nazi sympathisers and were only held to account by them electing the next "Literally Hitler" into the top office of the country.
Is Genius Greenblatt supposing that each of these people, with first and second amendment provisions, be silenced over simply just shutting down all media which is controlled by those not running it properly?
Good luck running that one by your income stream providers Jonny Boy.
Fair enough. But reposting it AS a covenant is fake news. The word "Covenant" only shows up once in the original document and it is to 'quote' from the Quran:
Ye are the best of Peoples, evolved for humanity, enjoining what is right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book had faith, it were best for them: among them are some who have faith, but most of them are perverted transgressors. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; if they come out to fight you, they will show you their backs, and no help shall they get. Shame is pitched over them (like a tent) wherever they are found, except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allah and from people; they draw on themselves wrath from Allah and pitched over them is (the tent of) destitution. This because they rejected the signs of Allah, and slew the Prophets in defiance of right; his because they rebelled and transgressed beyond bounds. The Holy Quran Sura 3: Ali-'Imran:110-11
Now you have to remember that their original "Covenant" is translated from Arabic and the Quran is meant to be read in Arabic as it has never once been translated beyond what is considered the divine form it was created in. So we have translation typos here. The word "Covenant" is used only once and it is taken from a different document which is alleged to be the very word of god himself spoken through Gabriel to the Islamic prophet.
To try and water all of this down to some sort of comparable route to what is going on with Israel and Palestine is to make a mockery of those who you are asking to accept it as fact.
I'm not a person of faith and so I don't have any qualms about about who may be more right in their beliefs than someone else's - but I don't mock those with faith. That is their most precious gift and something which only they are truly know.
Misquoting, or worse yet purposefully relaying lies, only leads to more death. And that only leads to more again. So on and so forth.
Be a better Nazi Telia :)
There's nothing wrong with asking Telia.
But expecting an answer, well, that's just plain maroonic.