2
loubag1997 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally agree. It's interesting because I'm an atheist (not by choice, I wish I could be a believing Christian but I feel the evidence disproves it)....but I've always maintained that our society and culture must maintain its Christianity, or at least the facade of such, as a preventative measure to avoid the unpredictably disastrous results of moral relativism, which we are now seeing, and which is a DIRECT result of the decentering and decline of western Christianity with nothing but a void to replace it.

You even had a period of about 20 years (2000-2020) where the moral relativism which filled the void of Christianity resulted in a sort of "secular Christian morality" which prominent atheists falsely claimed had no connection to Christianity, but turns out it was extremely important as a residual effect. But as soon as a new cult (identity politics) was able to fill the void, it did. Human culture is basically incapable at this point of living without a "religion" to give us purpose and moral guidance.

6
loubag1997 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah every time I mention the name John Money suddenly the choir of wokeshits goes dead silent

18
loubag1997 18 points ago +18 / -0

Yeah… although it’s mostly Gen X or even early Millennials who have children that age now. And rather than a Boomer mindset, I think a lot of parents from those generations actually politically agrees with the propaganda.

27
loubag1997 27 points ago +27 / -0

It’s apparently rocket science to most parents as they are still sending their kids to these cesspools.

4
loubag1997 4 points ago +4 / -0

South Park is just depressing nowadays, how can you satirize when IRL is worse than anything you could ever conceive as a satirical joke??

This new satire on woke teachers from a few days ago from conservative youtuber JP Sears does remind me a lot of Mr. Garrison:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i8PYJfFbhw

40
loubag1997 40 points ago +40 / -0

This isn’t about “representation” though… it’s about dismantlement and replacement.

They KNOW that the character of Santa Claus is a White straight male, married to a White woman. Just like the character of Mickey Mouse is a mouse, the character of Aladdin is Middle Eastern, etc.

Their purpose isn’t some neutral goal of “representation”, it’s explicitly to DISMANTLE White, Heterosexual, Christian things. They even ADMIT this now, it’s not even a secret.

25
loubag1997 25 points ago +25 / -0

The goal is twofold, to (1) make money off nostalgia, and (2) retcon the old white-Christian-heterosexual nature of pre-21st century media and reshape it to fit modern Wokeist propaganda

18
loubag1997 18 points ago +18 / -0

In the sequel series, [Tim Allen] is on the brink of his 65th birthday and realizing that he can’t be Santa forever. He’s suddenly starting to lose his Santa magic, and more important, he’s got a family who could benefit from a life in the normal world, especially his two kids who have grown up at the North Pole. With a lot of elves, children and family to please, Scott sets out to find a suitable replacement Santa

Kal Penn will play Simon Choksi, an ambitious game inventor and product developer and a devoted single father. Simon can talk the tech-mogul talk but can’t walk the walk, and his dreams of being the next Bezos falls drastically short. But all that changes after a visit to the North Pole.

If you’re familiar with the movies, Tim Allen’s Santa’s real name was “Scott Calvin”, initials S.C.

Scott Calvin = Simon Choksi = SC = Santa Claus

Kal Penn is also gay… so you can bet Disney is gonna make a “Mr. & Mr. Claus”. This is unreal.

2
loubag1997 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is some reddit level complacency b.s. of an answer though if I'm being honest.

Imagine the reverse...a white Christian in Iran says "when these damn Arabs wish me a Merry Christmas I'm gonna block their dumb ass, it's forced assimilation to an Islamic construct while trying to dechristianize terminology. High Key brownwashing".

What do you think their answer is gonna be to that, or should be?? Not "if there's a more proper way to say Merry Christmas why don't you tell us?"....the answer is "off with his head!! Shut up you racist white Christian foreigner".

5
loubag1997 5 points ago +5 / -0

Are you sure there's no underlying message or agenda? I find that hard to believe for a Hollywood movie

14
loubag1997 14 points ago +14 / -0

Proves what everyone with a brain already knows, they are just virtue signalling to their American fans and stakeholders, they don't actually have any objective principles.

9
loubag1997 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's NYC, lost cause anyway.

Hard to believe just 21 years ago the whole country came together to support NYC, we are so far removed from that kind of cohesion.

11
loubag1997 11 points ago +11 / -0

Christmas is a Western civilization holiday, not just Christian. It has a lot of pagan elements in it, and of course a lot of secular elements from after Christianity. It's no different than an atheist westerner celebrating St. Patrick's, which is also officially a Christian holiday.

20
loubag1997 20 points ago +20 / -0

Holy shit you're right. Nobody saw that as even remotely possible as a real thing when it aired 20 years ago, but not only is it happening it's even worse than they were portraying as "satire" then. We are so fucked.

17
loubag1997 17 points ago +17 / -0

Meanwhile these same pricks will say it's offensive and exclusionary to say Merry Christmas. I can't with these entitled fuckers.

12
loubag1997 12 points ago +12 / -0

He's black and gay

44
loubag1997 44 points ago +44 / -0

Well they went with a woman last time and it bombed, naturally the next choice is black and gay!!

I bet the Bond producers are mad though since this was probably their choice for the next Bond

59
loubag1997 59 points ago +60 / -1

Satanists helping to murder babies and our society thinks they’re the good guys. What a time to be alive.

10
loubag1997 10 points ago +10 / -0

I would’ve avoided the term “over-educated”, it’s only gonna give them fodder for calling him and our side “uneducated”.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›