4
akira2501 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was a DJI drone. The same type they already wanted to ban. The FBI helpfully told us they were able to "exploit" the drone to get flight information out of it after the fact.

It's worse than you think already.

11
akira2501 11 points ago +11 / -0

one guy just fucked off randomly

My understanding is this is the guy who took the picture and he went looking for Crooks. Which is why it hard to believe it to be basic retardation. They saw the kid. They made his bicycle. They knew he must be on the roof. Officers started pouring into AGR. They tried to get a view up on the roof and an officer injured himself in the process. All before he took a shot.

The kid did drone surveillance the day before. He shot at a range that the government uses. You give someone a little bit of tactical training and they can do some pretty impressive things. You can do this in a week or two. The rest of military training is all about unit endurance and special skills.

I could come up with a better plan...on my own.

Trump dead was not the endpoint. It was most likely meant to be an initiating event. The way in which it was done was likely just as important.

I mean.. you have to have Jack Ruby ready to go before you give Oswald the order, right?

9
akira2501 9 points ago +9 / -0

Nothing. The problem is in the first line.

Disney, which owns seven studios

Until that's fixed you will have a movie company that produces whatever it wants without any real competition.

Bob Iger is about as qualified as a weatherman. He can tell you which way the wind is blowing. That's about it.

3
akira2501 3 points ago +3 / -0

Charlie Johns spent his life in hiding and refused to speak to the press. He can have his word but it seems like he doesn't want it.

For some reason.

1
akira2501 1 point ago +1 / -0

didn't notice their children getting brainwashed with fake history

Man.. it was terrible what they did to kunta kinte.

9
akira2501 9 points ago +10 / -1

It's revictimizing them all over again. To even ask them puts them into the spotlight and puts the pressure of public reputation on them. There's no ethical way to do this without incidentally bullying the person into an unrealistic outcome.

And it does not fly over their heads. They're all narcissistic manipulators. They know what they are doing. They're injuring the interests of a child in order to spare their own feelings.

ROPE.

1
akira2501 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is my home, not theirs.

Yea. Sure looks like it. You are totally in charge.

7
akira2501 7 points ago +8 / -1

It's written entirely from the "mass market" perspective. So to the extent they're talking about FAANG and companies of similar scale I don't doubt their experience. To the extent it represents the actual job market or that it has anything to do with running your own business it's total fucking garbage.

More "the tiny corner of America I confine myself to isn't exactly to my liking" retardation.

3
akira2501 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yea. We get it. The same retard has been publicly retarded for decades now. All you're doing is sending a signal to them to keep doing more of it.

You're doing like half the work for them. Why?

-5
akira2501 -5 points ago +1 / -6

This 2 do not contradict each other.

They suggest a priority.

If you are a Christian you would want others to help you not sin

Nor would I expect anyone to judge me should I have sinned.

This is just silly.

Then it should be simple to answer. What is your answer? What do you do when the sinner does not want your help? What do you do when his sin intrudes on your life? These are things that happen. "Helping to not sin" is a huge spectrum of problems.

He is saying that the lost sheep returns to Jesus, this would imply repentance not accepting sin.

He is also saying that being lost is expected and that for coming back to the fold all is forgiven and forgotten immediately.

Also there is nothing about violent retribution, I don't see that in the OP post either.

I expect that reasonable people can have a different view on this. You do understand that I meant this is part of a general trend though, correct?

-6
akira2501 -6 points ago +1 / -7

If you saw your brother sinning you'd stop him, correct?

As long as I'm not ignoring the plank in my eye to concern myself with the speck in his.

So stop anyone from sinning because they are your sibling.

What if they don't want to be stopped? Should I use violence? Immediately? Or.. is there a threshold? Like.. three warnings and then a punch.. or how do we address this? This person may not see themselves as my sibling.

Critically.. should I judge him for sinning?

This idea that Jesus would accept sin because he was a hippie is laughable.

He also preached "Do unto others as you would have done to you."

He didn't tolerate sin he insisted you leave it behind to be with him.

When the shepherd leaves behind the 99 and finds his lost sheep, does he not bring him into his arms, and tell the sheep, "I love you the most?"

Anyways.. there's a real message of judgement and of violent retribution afoot lately. It concerns me because the uniparty security state would love nothing more than a violent outburst as an excuse to roll out the next version of smart borders with facial recognition and AI driven "homeland security."

The apparent need to ensure this message is posted everywhere in forms that are acceptable and expected in the forums they are posted in leads me to wonder if this is just part of the manipulation.

Anyways.. what Jesus wants is your soul. In heaven. With God. That is what is most important. If you want to show you love God, bring as many souls as you can with you, and lead them, in front of you, into Heaven.

8
akira2501 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is true for the small subset of retards who post on twitter.

The other 95% are pretty reasonable and if you take them away from the source of influence for.. like.. literally 1 day.. they become instantly reasonable.

It's not that the media has a particular zeal for lying to you.. it's that it has to to capture this group..

On the upside.. it costs them Trillions every year.. it's not sustainable.

7
akira2501 7 points ago +7 / -0

They were stolen from and then lied to about it. When they got uppity they were turned into terrorists.

The administration committed crimes against the public, and as gay as it is, probably against the entirety of humanity. They also abused an elderly dementia patient to do it all.

7
akira2501 7 points ago +7 / -0

"too weak to beat him democratically."

Right. And you cheated last time. And you know you can't this time. So you are this desperate?

Christ.. an entire generation fellating the state.

2
akira2501 2 points ago +2 / -0

but I think his purchase of Twitter really threw a wrench in the deep state's ability to damage the elections.

People get this backwards all the time. The deep state wants money and influence. They don't care if the guy they work with wears a red tie or a blue tie. The major advantage is the longer they work with a blue tie the more the red tie people are willing to pay for their access.

They're not an agency with an agenda so much as they are an amorphous blob of collected power.

Think "mafia" and you'll start seeing it.

1
akira2501 1 point ago +2 / -1

He's had those for a long time.

Corporate espionage cuts both ways. It's silly to assume that someone has to be the target of it before they decide to engage with it themselves.

Anyways.. read the history of Musk using his own "corporate security" to shake down his own employees and whistle blowers.

Corporations are not people, friends.

4
akira2501 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's pedagogy. They're not interested in educating you they're interested in psychologically manipulating you. Negative peer pressure is a solid tool for accomplishing that.

4
akira2501 4 points ago +5 / -1

Scottish jewish

Rootless Cosmopolitans.

8
akira2501 8 points ago +8 / -0

The same editorial board would have loved to have convinced you that Hillary Clinton was a good person and would be an awesome lady leader.

They have no credibility. They are obvious mouthpieces for the deep state.

6
akira2501 6 points ago +6 / -0

FAILED BETRAYED REJECT

They're projecting their feelings about Biden. You could do an entire semester on the psychological problems encoded in this writing.

It reminds me of the crazy lady who lived across me at my first apartment. She'd fill legal pads with pages and pages of densely handwritten insanity and then she'd tape them up to her windows until they were all completely filled. Same energy here.

7
akira2501 7 points ago +7 / -0

Meanwhile.. put a bullet through these peoples ears.. then tell them to calm down.. "I didn't shoot your head and I don't know why your ear decided to start bleeding on it's own."

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›