Hahahhahahaha. I laughed too hard at this. When will female athletes and women just give it up. No one wants to watch women play sports. People want to watch the feminine figure be beautiful. That's why prior to modern degeneracy we had activities like ballet, figure skating, synchronized swimming, etc... that tried to turn female beauty into a competitive activity. No one gives a shit about women playing basketball or soccer or something. Tennis? Guys are watching for the skimpy skirts and the women grunting as if they've just been fucked to exhaustion after pulling their skirts up. No one cares about women playing sports.
If we kill everyone who disagrees with us, then we'll be able to unify the rest. This strategy has worked every time it has been tried...
Socialism is literally female nature. That's why it never dies and continues to this day. Socialism wasn't invented 150 years ago. The tenants of socialism have always been known, even in ancient Greece and those tenants have always been attributed toward the feminine. The more the world moves toward gynocracy and female dominance the more prevalent socialism is going to become. Most western nations are already socialist or at the very least, fascist,, despite lots of people pretending they aren't.
I would agree with you. Also, enforcing chastity.
Maybe I'm just too used to dealing with oyvey.negros where they say things like "the globalists are using race and sex to divide us! Diversity and inclusion is our strength! My based hispanic politician banned antisemitism. Israel is our greatest ally!" So I'm prefacing what you said to ensure no one draws the conclusion that race and sex are merely tools to divide us. They are real things that have real differences and result in real impacts to life regardless of how politics uses these realities to its advantage.
Correct but don't discount the behavioral differences in race and sex. What you wrote potentially suggests that if feminism and anti-racism didn't result in political power that neither would be a problem. They are only problems because they're exploited for political power. I'd propose that these 3 areas (simps, women and jews) exist as avenues for exploitation to gain political power because of the real behavioral differences in sex and race. Genetic differences. The difference between our two conclusions is I would say one has to deal with women, simps and jews regardless of the status of politics in order to solve politics. Your conclusions potentially suggests if you solve politics then women, simp and jews are no longer problems. I conclude that all 3 will always be problems that always must be dealt with regardless of the political situation.
What if... what if... here me out here, this could be groundbreaking. u/TheImpossible1 you're going to want to hear this too. What if jews, women and simps are in fact the problem. What if it's all 3?
According to western media.
Most people don't understand politics. They just do what they are told. While I do believe elections are rigged, the results are also not surprising. Sometimes I feel like too many people here don't venture outside of their bubbles in major cities. The average person is a complete retard when it comes to politics.
You can't win in the current environment. The only tactics that win is guns pointed at your enemies then triggers pulled resulting in the death of your enemies. All other tactics fail.
ZOG doing ZOG things. Wait, no, it must be the feminists. Ahh, whatever, same diff. The loss of WWII represented the end of the German people.
That's probably the right move tbh. At the very least, if you aren't actively killing your enemies right now you're just waiting until death which is just suicide drawn out.
I honestly, never imagined it until I started frequenting escorts. I realized "escorting" is a learned skill no different than any other profession. Like when you go to a car dealership and the salesman has a certain sales style that is learned from the car salesman training manual. Escorts operate the same. And here's the thing. They're still better than "real" girls who haven't learned how to say and act the way men want. Just like customer service skills can be learned and taught to others, so too can doing what men want. If escorts can all learn to say and do the same sort of thing I think AI Chatbots can easily learn exactly what they need to in order to be better than "real" women. That's my thoughts anyway. I truly think in the future, "real" humans will be inferior to the computer alternatives.
We aren't really doing anything to fix the problems in society so adaptation is the only way forward for many. The transhumanists have won.
I have a broader list. Any person or company who isn't outwardly expressively pro-patriarchy and anti-gynocracy is considered a feminist by me. Yes, that means 99.99% of our society and yes that's accurate.
The problem has never been males lack of biological function, it has always been lack of suitable woman to put seed into and lack of suitable society to raise children and maintain a wife. You'd have to be suicidal to have kids with an average woman in a western country.
The school system has been brainwashing kids since the 1800s.
If only we could get Ye on the anti-feminism train. He seems to be on the Jews are the reason women are fucked train. Will he make the full progression and realize it's women's nature that is the problem?
Are you trying to be technical? Like it's not all because exceptions exist so technically he should say most? No one really cares.
His point is valid though. Suggesting women aren't a problem because look married women vote the way we want isn't the right way to look at it anyway. He's saying the correlation isn't marriage but it's age and though he presents no evidence, knowing what we know about marriage demographics and age, his assertion is most likely correct. We actually don't need evidence to draw that conclusion either. To truly have evidence we'd need breakdowns of ages and marriage status of women but we don't likely have this. That doesn't mean he's wrong or that someone should require evidence. Given what we do know his conclusion is the most reasonable.
He's right. You might be able to find sources if you search for the age breakdowns of marriages. The younger you go the less prevelence marriage is and the older you go the more prevelant it is.
Then give married men two votes. I don't think it though because women are ultimately in control of relationships not men. Most men would settle down if the right woman would have them. Modern data on this tells us all we need to know. As women gained economic power, relationships tanked yet when women actually cost men money to support, the number of single men was minimal.
I mean yeah, we should have a dictatorship run by men and women should all be shackled and chained to the bedposts. All votes are fake. The two parties are the same. Women control everything. Sure whatever but in this context, women shouldn't be allowed to vote and that's a good thing. I can't imagine what warped world you live in where you say you're anti-gynocracy and think women should be allowed to vote.
Yeah, I remember back to being around 14yo... Gym class... All I talked about with my guy friends was checking out women's cleavage. I can't remember one time being like "wow that girl was so good at a sport, I want to watch her play x sport or play x sport with her". Never happened.