I went on here specifically to check if it did the Body Type A and B thing. Looks like it is Type 1 and 2. I was seconds away from subscribing to GamePass but now I am not bothering.
What is this cringy complaint? The son is not "purely white" you can see that he has Asian features. The wife is clearly Asian and the kida are hapas, not "mulatto". It's not "dei slop" for a White guy to be fucking and breeding a tan-skinned Asian woman and them starting an upper-class family that has expensive hobbies and lifestyle that involve use of a 3D printer. And I say that as a White male who is not even into Asian women.
All this is because the guy supposedly accidentally typed the word "kike" instead of "hike" and posted it without proofreading, then edited it, but not before you saw it?
The H is close to the K on a QWERTY keyboard, I accidentally type out "kike" when trying to type out the word "like" occasionally. I tend to be more careful with the word "bigger" but not so much just the word "big".
Apparently the movie Godzilla Minus One had a less-than-$15-million budget because the visual effects workers in Japan there were "overworked and underpaid" and they were "exploited" by "capitalism" with slave driver whips and such.
I consider Gab, Parler, Truth Social and all these other Twitter/x.com alternatives to be boring because it is just a circlejerk echo chamber where everyone either agrees with me or is more "right-wing" than me. Commie faggots and people who self-identify as "leftist" mostly refuse to go on these sites because they know they will lose all their arguments in an open marketplace of ideas and debate.
after Elon Musk bought it, Twitter became somewhat usable. Most of the Jews/"liberals"/faggots are addicted to the platform and still argue on there even tho their echo chamber was broken by Elon Musk. It is still too censored against "right-wing" talk. I can't say "faggot" on there without my post being hidden.
My political beliefs are that I voted for Donald Trump all three times, I never voted before then, and Trump is the greatest U.S President of the past 100 years, but he would be better if he stopped giving money to "Israel" and publicly stated that the Israelis deserve Hamas, because the Zionists created that shithole state in their magical 2000 years ago "Holy Land" in 1947 being all entitled to what their "ancient ancestors used to live here!" yadda yadda. I don't give a fuck about if the "Palestinian" people count as a distinct identity from being basically the same generic Arab-ish culture as Egyptian or Jordanian, I just think that anyone who was living in that area when those "Jews" invaded the land have a right to retaliate against them.
My movie theater experiences are all over the place, I think they are more fun than generically browsing a "streaming platform". Sometimes I see stuff with family and friends, sometimes I go by myself. It's a less expensive "hobby" than many other hobbies, even when I pay for meals at the dinner theaters.
- Godzilla Minus One Minus Color (having saw the original color version late 2023 on December 29th)
- American Fiction (made more sense to me because I read the funny 2001 novel it was based on to prepare for the movie)
- The Iron Claw
- Bob Marley: One Love
- Dune Part Two
- ShortsTV Presents the Oscar-nominated live-action short films released in 2023 (The After/Red, White, and Blue/Knight of Fortune/The Invincible/The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar)
- A24's Civil War
- The Blue Angels
- Bad Boys Ride or Die
- Horizon an American Saga Chapter 1
- A Quiet Place Day One
- Inside Out 2
- The Lion King 1994 (30th anniversary)
- Twisters
- Deadpool and Wolverine
- M. Night Shyamalan's Trap
- Beetlejuice Beetlejuice
- Stop Making Sense by Talking Heads and Jonathan Demme
- Am I Racist?
- Saturday Night
- The Wild Robot
- Gladiator II
- Wicked
- Sonic the Hedgehog 3
Ah, unlike the art book of drawings/paintings by Simon Stålenhag.
Ah, the Simon Stålenhag art book.
"call the 22yo guy who thinks the 16yo he saw on the beach in a bikini is hot a pedo. To the point where they even call any man in his 30s who is attracted to even an 18 legal adult a pedo."
And they won't take into account when, not if, the 18-year-old "girl" has been whoring around for years (hopefully no more than a few years, preferably two if there must be an "s" at the end of "years") but the guy is a kissless virgin who needed to work on becoming good husband material first by making money (that women have multiple options of not making, first, in order to find a decent man).
Most 18-year-old American guys shouldn't be having sex, unless they somehow have lots of money or resources at such a young age. This is precisely why a 30-year-old guy is entitled to a much younger woman; most women his own age are already married, or are whores*, or are divorced, and generally are not mother material. It makes sense if a guy is a 30-year-old virgin: modern women's standards are idiotic and delusional. If a woman is 30 years old and a virgin she generally deserves less sympathy, as she will almost never be called a creep or accused of "harassing" a "poor guy" with her "creepiness".
And enough of shaming a 22 year old guy for losing his virginity to an 18-year-old high school senior graduating in a few months with the "she's still in high school!" nonsense. Like graduating from government-enforced indoctrination camps at at 12th grade is some rite of passage that officially makes young women competent for sex, and she's a few months away from being qualified for your virgin 22-year old ass.
ASTERISK section: *If you had sex outside of marriage once, or at least not in a very committed relationship, you are a whore/slut, and I say the same of any man.
The reason why "slut-shaming" is seen as a thing that is mistreating women, and not men, why it is a "double standard", is because women are the upholders of that double standard, Women and the small amount of men who are successfully promiscuous.
It is primarily some women who are okay with men being sluts, until it directly affects them. Until their hot boytoy who they delusionally believe is their exclusive partner, goes and fucks a younger woman.
Any man who is not a womanizer alpha male "Chad", who then celebrates such male promiscuity being done with lots of women, is a cuck.
Oh, no, the person behind that one nice-looking independently-produced animation pilot that came out a year or two ago, about the cat furries doing Prohibition-era bootlegging, (which I also heard is based on the person's long-running webcomic) is a whiny faggot whining about there not being enough censorship on Twitter (I still get censored on Twitter anyway for calling people faggots and such)?
There was like a less than 1% chance I might have simped a few dollars to "support this indie creator" 's dream of getting this pilot animated into more episodes, now it's mildly gone down to actual zero, whatever, maybe enough other people will simp for Lackadaisy or not.
What are you accomplishing from pointing out that she is a lolcow? Is that what KotakuInAction2 is about? Just generically whining about anything vaguely leftoid? Why do you feel the need to even talk about this? You're not even interested in the Wicked movie, even if you were to discover that the story itself has the same generic "people aren't always what they seem, you are not immune to propaganda" message of The Wizard of Oz. (like seriously the story doesn't "subvert" the themes of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, Critical Drinker liked the movie, I dunno maybe you think he is a centrist cuck or something. I'm probably more a White supremacist and way more racist than the Drinker)
I myself disagree with the whining that OP is doing, however, I must say to you, token non-rightoid here taking a dive into a place that is not an echo chamber for you. well first congratulations for stepping outside an echo chamber, and as far as your comment goes:
It seems that you believe that the primary way that people become racist against Black people is by seeing WorldstarHipHop videos of Black people in physical brawls and such. Basically being propagandized by being shown real-life video material to an exaggerated degree to become radicalized into thinking that represents the norm.
Naw man, that ain't how it happened to me. I actually live among Black people. For me, "contact" is working the past several years at grocery stores (I also work at FedEx, but no customers there) where I encounter hundreds of people a day from every racial background. They are more likely to be like that, compared to Whites and Latinos, Indians/South Asians, and the rare (East) Asians as a GENERALIZATION, and of course there are EXCEPTIONS to generalizations. But I also know from experience that White people and other groups be like that as well, but my lifestyle and the sample size of people I see, at a grocery store (almost everyone grocery shops), combined with me living in an area with a large sample size of Black, White, and Latino, has indicated to me that stereotypes about some people being MORE LIKELY to be a certain way, is simply true.
That being said, I don't care for the whining about Cynthia Erivo having five middle names because this person only knows this from viewing a Wikipedia article. She still markets herself as "Cynthia Erivo".
How can it be a bad argument when it's not even an argument at all? Or is saying "the character she portrays in her most famous movie is a regular character (even with green skin)" an argument?
By "regular accessible character", to clarify, I meant that the character in the movie itself is not bogged down by idpol obnoxiousness.
"Take a look at her general appearance ten years ago. She's purposely emphasizing her 'queer' identity, as a promotional stunt for her shitty movies."
And? What's your point? that you don't like the fact that as she ages and becomes more famous she chooses to look more cringey when out of costume as specific characters in movie roles? That's just what women and celebrities are like sometimes.
Do you not like it because you feel that it is "dishonest" or "performative" based on how she was when she was earlier in her career? Who fucking cares, what's your point? You aren't even interested in the Wicked movie or anything.
It would be one thing if you had clearly stated that you were one of those people who was a fan of the musical before it became a movie (I've only seen the movie) and felt that they injected extra idpol or "current-day cringe" into the movie (as far as I can tell they didn't, in the Wicked movie her green skin is no more an allegory for muh racism than it is for Shrek being an ogre)
Here, look, you may think it is some "deflection" to change the subject, if you want an example of my broader political beliefs, I am one of those few people who knows how to properly call out the issue with a news story that is making headlines recently: there's an Idaho public schoolteacher who has a sign in her classroom with ten cartoon hands with hearts on them, with the words EVERYONE IS WELCOME HERE above. Eight out of the ten hands are brown-skinned, the other two being pale-skinned.
The building administration and district personnel told her to take the sign down. And the story is being treated as if she this taxpayer-funded public school teacher being persecuted by being told to take down this "benign" sign. It's clearly creepy race propaganda to show 8 out of 10 hands being brown-skinned in IDAHO. It is obvious social engineering to suggest that Idaho is "not diverse enough". I live in a minority-White area in Indianapolis. We don't need the whole world to be "diverse".
Some celebrities look or sound aesthetically weird, what's your point? When she was playing the Wicked Witch, she was just a regular accessible character.
Literally the first one off the top of my head, I scroll down to the comments and it is the first comment I see.
"and I think I only watched maybe a handful that even seemed interesting."
So how much are you actually trying?
Yeah, like the others were saying, Godzilla Minus One is a/the obvious first choice for 2022-2024.
I got fourteen downvotes (and two upvotes) for communicating basically the same thing.
I know that, but what the fuck purpose does this out of-context YouTube comment where we don't even know what video it comes from do to help communicate that coherently? Showing this YouTube comment randomly on a KiA board seems useless.
And I could tell that originally c/KotakuInAction was the general "GamerGate/anti SJW gamers" board and c/KotakuInAction2 was where people from that crowd would be more encouraged to talk about specific politics, but "KiA1" died off and no longer has any new posts since a few years back.
I know it is important to discuss these issues outside of "purely politics" spaces, I know it is important to "radicalize" gamers to literally rise up in other areas, but I don't see how shouting into the void randomly without context helps, especially when there is an excessive amount of this material when browsing on this board. But hey at least I got two people upvoting me, not including myself. I don't have myself upvoted here.
What was this YouTube comment from?
It's kind of boring how this board/community/subforum is just a general social commentary space for shit that has nothing to do with GAMERS RISING UP, like WTF does a White-ish looking American delinquent in Singapore in 1994 getting 4 caning lashes have to do with any current-day things other than arbitrarily bringing up George Floyd in 2025?
"wokeness" just call it what it is, fetishizing mixed-race couples to a creepy, exaggerated degree to children.
For the record, I have an Xbox One that I purchased used from a friend in February 2021 for about US$150 because he had gotten a series X anyway and I wanted to have something that could play video games because I hadn't owned much of anything that could play remotely modern video games in several years.
I have several physical used games, that I haven't played or haven't played much of yet. Buying used from a used game shop means helping out a small business.
I thought about doing one month of GamePass Ultimate for $20 even tho I am not sure if my Internet connection at Xfinity is fast enough bandwidth to do streaming gameplay in realtime, and now it doesn't matter because zero games with Body Type A and B / 1 and 2 will ever get my money, I don't care if it is "good anyway". These globalist companies do it to mock us and tell us "you will suck it up and consume the product, what are you going to do, not buy the product and be left out and experience FOMO? What you want to be one of those weird fringe political people who boycotts a video game over ONE little thing? Why does it matter to you, why are you so sensitive, just get over it bro, it's just a brief piece of text in the character creation screen, it doesn't affect the storytelling in the game bro."
Nope, don't care about such fear of missing out, and most entertainment/art in any genre or any medium from any era, year, or time period it was created and released in, is shit anyway, I am fine with missing out on most of it. Plus this is literally just Oblivion with better graphics and a few updated gameplay features. Lots of mods exist for high-end PCs to run Oblivion 2006 with fancier graphics.