4
The_Shadow_of_Intent 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm a dub guy when it works but I can't stand for that fat blob

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't have the expertise to evaluate your claims, but they're interesting. If post-quantum crypto exists then post-quantum general encryption shouldn't be that difficult right?

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly it would be funny if you did sign up and reported your experiences. Even the people who like PF here wouldn't do that though

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point ago +1 / -0

When the choice is to terminate a pregnancy vs 18 years minimum with the abuser, most women choose to get away from the abuser.

That's not even a real choice. Nobody is making women sign a contract that they have to stay with the father if they keep the baby. Ever hear the term "single mom"?

7
The_Shadow_of_Intent [M] 7 points ago +7 / -0

OK, he's gone. I'm not sure how these accounts get through the filter, but it seems to be 3 years old so maybe accumulating karma in other subs has something to do with it.

17
The_Shadow_of_Intent 17 points ago +17 / -0

Here's the thing. You can rail about trannies, feminism, socialism, immigration all day and it's business as usual. The moment you mention Israel, the machine reacts.

7
The_Shadow_of_Intent 7 points ago +7 / -0

I mean, it sunk, then got fixed lol

2
The_Shadow_of_Intent 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Clearly" according to you, a 20th century immigrant to Europe. I'm going to need to see more documentation.

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

See the thing is, an N-word chain does actually amuse people here. You just piss people off. So get with the program or get gone.

5
The_Shadow_of_Intent 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you go by the public meaning of these words at the time of the writing, would they support birthright citizenship? Obviously, yes.

Why would you think that "under the jurisdiction of" included illegals in the 19th century?

7
The_Shadow_of_Intent 7 points ago +7 / -0

Obviously, it wasn't meant to be applied to illegals, but the way it's written seems pretty straightforward.

Again, if you asked the guys who wrote it originally, they would laugh at the idea it gave citizenship to illegals. Don't change the subject.

18
The_Shadow_of_Intent 18 points ago +18 / -0

Far-fetched? It would be the normal understanding when the amendment was written.

5
The_Shadow_of_Intent [M] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Post something of value or you will be given the boot

3
The_Shadow_of_Intent 3 points ago +3 / -0

I never know what I'm looking at in these videos. Appears like bundles of clothes on the ground

2
The_Shadow_of_Intent 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most of these gains are in healthcare. With all respect to the good doctors/nurses who keep people healthy, it's yet another non-producing, government-funded sector to bloat.

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point ago +1 / -0

There were strong anti-Jewish reactions everywhere precisely because Eastern Europeans Jews were so poor and uncultured.

Source?

But that suggests that there is something fundamentally Jewish about Christianity. Also, this makes quite little sense. So communism and Christianity are both Jewish? They're polar opposites.

Christianity = Judaism reaching its fulfillment, communism = Judaism rejecting Christ.

OK, so Marxism shows the influence of Jeiwshness because his father was a Jew who converted to Christianity, but by that standard, it's much less Jewish than Christianity.

It's very simplistic to think that Jewish culture is completely severed by switching belief systems.

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point ago +1 / -0

No substantiation? You're becoming lazy even by your standards.

source? Fiddler on the Roof?

I guess Christianity was a 'Jewish movement' according to you then.

Yes, Christianity was indeed a Jewish movement because God used the Jews. People have a problem admitting that here but it's fairly simple.

It makes perfect sense. I'm sure you'll cry about Redditors again, but this is the fallacy of composition. There is nothing Jewish about communism, in fact, it is very anti-religious.

Lol to think that the influence of ethnoreligious culture ends when you stop believing in God is just so naive. Ashkenazis are atheist by default.

1
The_Shadow_of_Intent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Were Jews even overachievers? Weren't they just very poor peasants?

Simply, no.

Why are they only Jews when it suits you? By your standards, the Apostles were all Jews (and evil).

Yes, the apostles were Jews, but they were not evil. Why? Because they did not do evil. Obviously.

I find your position ludicrous, because there would still be nothing inherently 'Jewish' about Communism.

That makes utterly no sense.

view more: Next ›