16
TheOpiner 16 points ago +16 / -0

Or as it was more commonly known, being unattractive. Being unsuccessful in dating or unattached are aggravating factors.

17
TheOpiner 17 points ago +17 / -0

We have reached the classification (Society vs Incels) and symbolisation (Andrew Tate and Adolescence) stages. Next up comes discrimination when the Government is lobbied to bring in new laws to segregate and criminalise "incels". Then follows dehumanisation.

1
TheOpiner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Swap 4 and 5 around (their allowance of sewage into rivers and the sea shows their environmental pledges are all mouth and no action) and delete 6. That would be more accurate.

7
TheOpiner 7 points ago +7 / -0

There is also an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill which will ban pornography and any sexual behaviour that is not between at least two consenting adults in a private setting without payment or commercial benefit.

And the forthcoming age/ID verification online from July 25th is a trojan horse for a privately run Digital ID system. There are three systems under the Digital ID Connect scheme but they are all run by one company - Yoti.

And it was recently reported that the Government wants access to bank accounts in a new Fraud bill to give civil servants powers to audit and freeze bank accounts on the Governments whim. What happened to the Canadian truckers on steroids. Also plans to link Digital ID with bank accounts would allow the UK to implement a social credit system.

11
TheOpiner 11 points ago +11 / -0

Have we reached the point now where being cautious and engaging in crime prevention now gives someone the "ick"? Where's the person on TikTok who compiles the ick list when you need them (I think they're up to over 800 now)?

I think everyone knows of male disposability and how much male lives are valued by society but have we also reached the point where someone who commits an "adult abortion" is now seen as more attractive for having committed that act (see also, Louis Mangione)?

3
TheOpiner 3 points ago +3 / -0

See the experiment with Norah Vincent. Disguised herself as a man for eighteen months and the psychological damage that was caused to her from that experiment after seeing how men were treated by society is what led to her taking her own life.

2
TheOpiner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Attractive men don't need to go and meet women. When they use the term "creep" what they really mean is unattractive men. The type of men whom these feminist activists want removed from society for "the safety of women and girls".

4
TheOpiner 4 points ago +4 / -0

Men commit murder around 10 times more than women and are 2-4 times more likely to commit violent crimes.

Now who are the victims of those crimes? Hint - they're overwhelmingly not women.

Now compare crimes from indigenous men versus migrant men.

12
TheOpiner 12 points ago +12 / -0

BBC confirms all websites with age restrictions must implement "robust" age verification by July 25th. Some select websites must do so now.

This isn't just adult websites but also video streaming sites, retailers, insurance providers, discussion forums, search engines and social media to name a few. Essentially, if your whole website is not "safe for kids", it must have age/ID verification.

Platforms which host age-restricted content must have "robust" age checks in place by July.

13
TheOpiner 13 points ago +13 / -0

I agree. But the online safety advocates deal with feelings under the slogan of "won't somebody please think of the children" and are likely to align with the authoritarian left both socially and economically.

25
TheOpiner 25 points ago +25 / -0

And would it shock anyone that the online safety advocates believe this is nowhere near enough. They still want the Internet shut down and replaced with a Government curated national Intranet a la Kwangmyong in North Korea because it's the only way they can "protect children from online harms".

37
TheOpiner 37 points ago +37 / -0

If he had posted that in the UK, at best hoe_math would now be on the Prevent watchlist. As it turned out reported yesterday that Prevent considers concern over mass migration as "terrorist ideology".

https://archive.ph/cTWmQ

2
TheOpiner 2 points ago +2 / -0

From what I have heard and seen, the mainstream media has been backing Trump and calling everything Elon says as "unsubstantiated claims". Elon managed to do something thought impossible - have the MSM back Trump.

5
TheOpiner 5 points ago +5 / -0

And not just restricted to the US. The UK Government is on record as to be preparing to use AI to predict who will commit a crime and stop it before it happens.

All with the help of the online safety acts that are being introduced in the west. In the US, that will be under the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA).

17
TheOpiner 17 points ago +18 / -1

You don't even own your console you paid for now. You merely buy a licence to use it. Nintendo recently gave itself the right through the EULA to brick any console that it suspects is using an exploit or merely violates their terms of service.

3
TheOpiner 3 points ago +3 / -0

We've reached the point where the mainstream media is defending Trump by calling everything that Musk says as "unsubstantiated claims". I'd never thought I would see the day.

1
TheOpiner 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think companies or Governments care. They'll just say that employment is a privilege, not a right and it's someone else's problem to deal with.

0
TheOpiner 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hamas - a proscribed terrorist organisation in its entirely in the UK.

2
TheOpiner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because automation is different to the technological advances before it. The purpose of automation is to remove the human element from work by replacing them with automated obedient, low cost and more available labour compared to a human who age, require breaks, want offspring, wants rights and so forth.

1
TheOpiner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Automation. They're outsourcing the testing to other AI firms for the tests but when it's rolled out, it'll be in-house AI Amazon will be using.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›