-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +1 / -6

Most surrogate users are extremely rich men. Look at Ronaldo, he used a surrogate so his current girlfriend couldn't rinse him for child support.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +4 / -7

Sometimes even being a victim of the enemy can't break the brainwashing.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +6 / -11

Or it's not the right colour

If the baby's not the right color, I think you're entitled to a refund, because it's not your baby.

I don't think people who use surrogacy are so evil that they'd turn down a baby because it's not exactly what they imagined. Well...I don't think men who use it are. They're using it out of necessity to not get destroyed by women's legal power.

Feminist lesbian weirdos probably demand all the boys are aborted. In fact...I distinctly remember something like that, where a lesbian couple claims that they were promised a female child and got a boy.

-12
TheImpossible1 -12 points ago +7 / -19

What if you want a kid but not the attached parasite?

Surrogates are more of a "wealthy man who doesn't want to get wallet raped by an opportunistic demon" thing usually.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +2 / -6

Well, because I don't think I need to know anything about schools? I don't plan on having kids, after all.

I upvoted you anyway, despite the condescending tone.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +4 / -10

Nobody should ever be forced to interact with anyone if they don't want.

Correct, but women do that to men. I've quoted the court case that states men have no right to freedom of association against women. It should be the precedent that shuts up the "save women's sports" brigade.

but you are explaining away the rape of girls under the age of 10. You are cruel and incredibly fucked up.

Ah yes, because I don't believe NSDAP propaganda, I'm now a pedophile.

That I think you excusing literal terrorists is wrong and it makes me think less of you

This is my logic -

Tommy Robinson was the leader of the "grooming gang" movement.

One of the girls he believed whole-heartedly and pushed as a victim, was recently exposed for being a malicious liar with heavily disturbing beliefs about non-white men.

Am I not right to wonder if the others simply covered their tracks better?

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +4 / -13

The day he gets on the news for being a serial killer or something, I will be here with the surprised pikachu face.

The better half of society, everyone.

"If you don't worship us, you're a serial killer who needs to be locked up."

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +3 / -9

People have sisters, daughters, mothers and friends

Oh, and the kids who committed suicide after being torn apart in Title IX court didn't?

Good to know that women's joke sports mean more to you than young men's lives. You're turning into more of a TERF by the day.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +2 / -8

I mean, "protecting women's sports" at a federal level requires changes to Title IX. We already know that women's groups have been pushing for Dear Colleague to return under Biden because he literally ran on doing so.

It's highly unlikely they will sign off on changes just for women's sports and miss out on the opportunity to knife men in the back again.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +3 / -9

They will sneak Dear Colleague rules back into Title IX as the poison pill we're forced to swallow to "save women's sports".

Save this comment. Remember that over 50 women's organizations said Title IX must be reformed to "protect women from rape" in 2022.

Would I rather save my fellow man from being destroyed by evil people or entitled trash from a problem they created...it's not even a question. Repeal Title IX.

-11
TheImpossible1 -11 points ago +6 / -17

Remember that women began this tranny crusade in 2015.

They were begging us for help eight years ago, while Dear Colleague rules were still active. They have absolutely no fucking shame. Even now, they're demanding the return of Dear Colleague rules as the right simps for their worthless non-issues.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +7 / -11

written by and for people that are not half as evil as who we're dealing with right now, is just ensuring you end up on the losing side

I'm not sure entirely what you're advocating, but there's some merit to the thought that tactics based on principles and "treat others like you want to be treated" do not work against the "no bad tactics" feminist regime.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +1 / -8

Isn't it 16-18?

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +2 / -5

That's a non-sequitur, you can't assume that both sides are lying because one is.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›