Nobody should ever be forced to interact with anyone if they don't want.
Correct, but women do that to men. I've quoted the court case that states men have no right to freedom of association against women. It should be the precedent that shuts up the "save women's sports" brigade.
but you are explaining away the rape of girls under the age of 10. You are cruel and incredibly fucked up.
Ah yes, because I don't believe NSDAP propaganda, I'm now a pedophile.
That I think you excusing literal terrorists is wrong and it makes me think less of you
This is my logic -
Tommy Robinson was the leader of the "grooming gang" movement.
One of the girls he believed whole-heartedly and pushed as a victim, was recently exposed for being a malicious liar with heavily disturbing beliefs about non-white men.
Am I not right to wonder if the others simply covered their tracks better?
Nobody called you a pedophile (you did say I am a few days ago, but let's not talk about DAT). I don't think you are. I do think you are an absolute monster who likes the thought of little girls getting hurt, but I don't think that's sexual, you are just a lunatic who hates anything female.
So "disturbing thoughts about non-white men" is not okay. Disturbing thoughts about women okay. I see mate. I see.
He called me a stormfag yesterday for reasons that, unsurprisingly, don't actually exist. So he's likely just throwing out random words like SJWs do in the vague hope it carries enough weight to shutdown any opposing dialogue.
At this point it would be quite accurate to describe him as schizophrenic what with the increasing number of times he claims something that's factually incorrect and easily checked.
I see he took his usual approach to being proven wrong as well.
He once claimed that Kyle Rittenhouse's girlfriend was a "gold-digger", because of a "huge payout" (that didn't exist). I've brought it up many times, just to see how he'll defend his lies... and he'll reply to everything in the comment except that.
Correct, but women do that to men. I've quoted the court case that states men have no right to freedom of association against women. It should be the precedent that shuts up the "save women's sports" brigade.
Ah yes, because I don't believe NSDAP propaganda, I'm now a pedophile.
This is my logic -
Tommy Robinson was the leader of the "grooming gang" movement.
One of the girls he believed whole-heartedly and pushed as a victim, was recently exposed for being a malicious liar with heavily disturbing beliefs about non-white men.
Am I not right to wonder if the others simply covered their tracks better?
Nobody called you a pedophile (you did say I am a few days ago, but let's not talk about DAT). I don't think you are. I do think you are an absolute monster who likes the thought of little girls getting hurt, but I don't think that's sexual, you are just a lunatic who hates anything female.
So "disturbing thoughts about non-white men" is not okay. Disturbing thoughts about women okay. I see mate. I see.
He called me a stormfag yesterday for reasons that, unsurprisingly, don't actually exist. So he's likely just throwing out random words like SJWs do in the vague hope it carries enough weight to shutdown any opposing dialogue.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16b5lPnKSr/x/c/4TsavXmswSG
At this point it would be quite accurate to describe him as schizophrenic what with the increasing number of times he claims something that's factually incorrect and easily checked.
I see he took his usual approach to being proven wrong as well.
He once claimed that Kyle Rittenhouse's girlfriend was a "gold-digger", because of a "huge payout" (that didn't exist). I've brought it up many times, just to see how he'll defend his lies... and he'll reply to everything in the comment except that.