Nah, he's still a simp because rather than listening to what a man has to say, he immediately assumes the man is wrong and there is nothing wrong with the women.
5'10"
Don't take it personally, but that is the issue right there. And there is nothing you can do about it. You aren't even short, you are just an average height. And that one characteristic rules you out for a majority of women, unless you had another genetic X-factor to make up for it.
Simps gonna simp. Must defend milady's honour.
The secret is to be okay with not finding someone.
Even if I didn't meet her, I'd be happier alone than in an imperfect relationship.
This could be called something like "accepting MGTOW in principle", and is very powerful for men based on a standard analysis of negotiation in any context. If you are not willing to walk away from a bad deal and just say no, the other party has you by the balls and can demand anything they want. Obviously the same thing applies to men and relationships - if men are told that they need to find a woman or the most important thing a man could ever achieve is having access to sex, then they are easily manipulated into accepting bad deals as they aren't willing to walk away from these.
That's why most of the standard advice for men, from women, from "traditionalists" and even from "red-pilled men", is bunk - it still focuses entirely on men "getting" women, rather than men just being their own men and demanding a good deal, or being happy being alone if it doesn't come along.
Self esteem = women are so convinced of their own importance that they think they should be allowed to engage in extramarital affairs if they feel like it
Agency = women have always wanted to have affairs but didn't do it until it become easier/accepted as 'normal' by other women
Yes, you could argue whether these really are self esteem and agency, but it isn't unusual for women to mistake values for their "near enemies", a Buddhist concept that fits well.
Then, you underestimate the ability of people to find ways to disregard information that is inconvenient to their belief system. No brainwashed leftist scientist will be making any "impossible choices" as a consequence of this article. They will just rationalise it or ignore it.
You are taking Imp's comments far too seriously. He's a bit extreme, but that's nothing unusual on the internet. Fighting corruption isn't going to come from expecting only the default. It's going to come from expecting more. From fighting for more.
In my view, the problem with Imp isn't so much that his comments about women are crazy (they are over the top sometimes but whatever), it's that his focus on women distracts from men thinking about themselves. Men are never going to get any sympathy and respect from anyone, least of all women, unless they stand up and demand it. You need to do that rather than complaining about someone spouting shit about women on the internet. You need to care more about yourself than you care about "defending" women.
I think of my sister who streams video games with me every Monday and trusts me to babysit my nephew for her.
Seriously, don't you see the problem with this? Your own sister trusting you to babysit your nephew is something that you should expect by default. It's nothing special. It should just be the way of the world. The fact that you think this shows a "good side" of women paints an extremely sad picture. Why should women treating a man as a person be anything to write about? Worse, why should a woman treating her own male relatives as people be anything to write about?
Fair enough. That's what I thought you meant with the first part of your comment, but the last line referencing melanin threw me off.
I'm not sure your comment actually supports the point that dividing people into "black" and "white" races is "scientific". Rather, it suggests that race is much more nuanced than being able to simply divide people by skin colour, that is, there are many races of people who share similar skin colour who would have different attributes on average.
"Dox yourself or what I say must be true!"
Your confidence in "scientists" is misplaced. A very large number of them are raging leftists whose thinking is set in stone by their politics.
Imp has a point here. Most teachers are female, more so the ones that want to be "nice" instead of teach so it seems rather deliberate to make the teacher male.
Yes. Your comments are sometimes useful to read. His comments attacking you are just nitpicking bullshit that serve no purpose.
It's not just financial threats. She could have had him throw in jail as an "abuser" by lying to the police. People would believe her over him by default. Luckily he had such a big pile of evidence she couldn't play that card, but that's the card many female abusers use.
Why the fuck is everyone treating this stupid text generator like some kind oracle?
Maybe I'm just looking at things with rose-tinted glasses, but quality of the propaganda in Western countries really has fallen dramatically. It used to be a bit more subtle, but now it's Democratic People's Republic of Korea-esque, e.g. the governments of Western countries are "democratic" (obviously, since they say so) so any questioning of the government is "anti-democratic" (= "bad").
I'm surprised you think women are doing this to sell weapons, when a much more obvious motive for people that hate men is to have all the men and boys killed in a war.
Because there are plenty of people who believe woman are wonderful and should never be criticized, even here.
Burning vinyl chloride produces hydrogen chloride and phosgene. These are toxic. That is a scientific fact. Whether any individual's "symptoms" is actually caused by these is another matter.
I’m hearing ppl as far as Canada claim they have had burning eyes/nose, sore throat, and headaches for days. I’m also hearing ppl as close as 15 miles from ground zero saying they are having no symptoms. Lot of contradictory info going around.
No doubt some people are just paranoid, but I'd like to point out that this isn't necessarily contradictory. Direction of spread of the chemicals, and whether they come down from the atmosphere, will depend a lot on weather patterns - wind, rain etc.
Another comment there said it was just "burning polyvinyl chloride" so largely harmless. It wasn't poly vinyl chloride, it was the monomer vinyl chloride, which is a hazardous gas itself (exposure limit 1ppm) and turns into hydrogen chloride and phosgene when burned, which are also nasty.
No idea why so many people are so obsessed with this thing. It seems to me that main use of ChatGPT by users here is to generate outrage bait, which is one of the "main topics" of this forum. Posting that nonsense is certainly a great way to earn internet points!
Of course the MGTOW that you do hear from are the ones that do complain. You don't hear from that don't complain because they aren't complaining. It's just standard survivorship bias.