Granted. But even so the prospect of purchasing Intel gasp being a no no has always evaded me. Oh what like it creates an incentive? Considering how whistle blowers or anyone even attempting to do the right thing are treated who could blame them?
That's the key right there. If you make some genuinely veiled comment about some unknown figure and then someone gets agro, they just outted themselves.
"Someone farted"
One guy in a group of a hundred people yells "NO I DIDNT FART!!"
Ladies and gentlemen, we found the person who farted.
DW pulled the same shit when SC was complaining about their proposed contract. He didn't call them out by name and Jeremy and Ben immediately start defending themselves against accusations no one directed at them. Couldn't be anymore obvious. They outted themselves.
Antisemitism seems to be caused by semitism.
Giving women the vote was bad for two big reasons. The first is obvious, they vote, and they vote like retards. Two, it creates a new breed of politician who attempts to curry their vote and since women vote like retards, in order to appeal to them, politicians are then Incentivized to propose progressively retarded policies. Stupid ideas get almost no traction with men, not even stupid men. But even *intelligent" women vote for retarded ideas because they vote with their hormones instead of their brain.
Not sure what's worse, this, or MJ being made.blaxk in the MCU.
I think instead if trying to pit two things against each other's we can acknowledge both suck in their own way
Rape victims have gotten AIDS or other diseases, pregnant by their rapist, made infertile. And those are only the tangible things. Many intangibles. Not all, but it is possible.
I'd say this. If you falsely accuse someone, your punishment should be whatever the punishment for a legit rape would have been. Plus reimbursement for all legal fees.
Also, I'm surprised a law has not been passed to prohibit employers from taking punitive action before there's been a conviction. Maybe it should be.
The civil rights act should be repealed. I should have the freedom to hire whoever I want. Why freedom of association ends at personal relationships is beyond me.
Stone isn't exactly a cheap way of storing tons of information either hahaha.
I think the best bet is to just make as many copies as possible. Dissemination is probably the best way to keep something from being lost to time. Like not keeping legal documents in your home, or at least keeping duplicates in a security box. Eggs baskets etc. Come to think of it that's sort of how Bitcoin ledger works.
Fascinating right? That so much stuff is lost and it's digitized and from our own lifetime. I myself probably have hundreds of photos I've taken lost on some USB thumb drive or SD card or even a CD R from twenty years ago. Now it makes sense how Alexandria got lost and every thing else under the sun.
Underrated oldish game was Killswitch.
Boom. Same with books, movies, TV. I've been playing SCBW since the 00s and I rewatch the LOTR trilogy monthly. It's that good. I guess it's like being married. Ol faithful over and over as opposed to a different whore every night.
I appreciate your response. I'm still not sold though. The censorship thing still gets me. Here in the US tech platforms censored ile crazy anything anti narrative regarding COVID or the election. To the nth degree. So I'm inclined to think that if something isn't allowed to be said it's because it's true. Otherwise just let me run their mouth and look a fool.
I've never heard anyone claim two buildings didn't get destroyed killing thousands of people. The doubt is in what caused them to get destroyed, and who the masterminds/orchestrators behind the incident really were. I've never heard anyone outright deny something happened on 9/11/2001.
And I think it's similar with the Holocaust.
Imagine something so true and so convincing that denying it is a punishable, jailable offence in some countries. That definitely isn't suspicious....
Probably a Jewish judge.
But there are actual Jews who went on record claiming to be Holocaust survivors who were actually just clout chasers or sympathy chasers. So it's.not stupid for someone to bring it up.
Or the constant beating of it into people's heads at a young age. I had three holocaust survivors speak to me at two different schools when in mid/HS. I've never had a survivor of communism, or an escape from east Germany, or a survivor of 9/11.
So that's super suspicious.
Another thing I've learned is that typically whatever is banned in the public sphere, is accurate. For example in 2020/2021 people weren't allowed to post on social media that hydroxy chloroquine worked against COVID. Or mention other alternatives like Ivermectin. Governors made it illegal for doctors to prescribe it as treatment even though off label treatment is super common like Ozempic for fucking weightless, which actually caused a shortage for people who supposedly actually need it to treat diabetes. But hey, off label is fine if it kills diabetics, so long as other people lose weight. And the Holocaust is at the tippy top of things you are not allowed to question. It's illegal in some countries. It's banned on many platforms. When people even try to discuss it they're shutdown rudely by people like you. The ADL tries to ruin your life. That's super suspicious.
Hitler was trying to breath new life into his people. He sincerely loved the German people and wanted them to prosper and reclaim their old glory. I actually find that very admirable. And as someone who frankly doesnt dismiss the notion of Jews at the time trying to bastardize Germany, I can at least sympathize with what he intended to do. Jews do it in the US currently, to this very day. Is it a stretch to suggest they did the same thing in 1930s Germany?
And even if you did read up a lot of these weren't exactly advertised.
Okay, example. "Blacks commit a lot of crime" simple statement. True on it's face. Now, one can be (((deceitful))) and say
well blacks don't commit a lot of tax fraud.
Well what about whites?
Or, how black are they really? They probably have some whitening them from the days if slavery.
What do you mean by black? Are Indians black? What about this and that.
Etc etc.
But the fact is ordinary people.know the simple statement to be true. Blacks rape at higher rates than other groups. And murder. And assault. And loot. And armed robbery. And when the kayman says blacks commit a lot of crime we all know exactly what is being referred to. But a deceitful person will feign ignorance or outrage at the assertion and argue over tedious nuance.
Which is why lawyers make things as long and arduous and convoluted as possible. And I wonder if a certain racial demo has an inclination towards being lawyers...
I see what you did there ;)
Because Trump has been painted as the second Hitler and everything about him is maligned. His policies, his tweets, his haircut, how he eats his steak, his businesses, his kids, etc. He is probably the most maligned person in history behind Hitler and Jesus. So it's an apt case study comparison.
I think you've confused him overreacting with everyone else under reacting and taking insufficient action. Or better, you're confusing over reacting with poor messaging/marketing. It's not that he over reacted but his messaging clearly was ineffective. So with an awkward combination of hindsight (you know now what was done, nothing) and ignorance (you know not how bad the problem really was), people look at him and say wow he was nuts. When in reality he was dead accurate and everyone else was a fool to not believe him.
Well then you misunderstand the purpose of these types of interactions. You aren't trying to convince the person you're talking to. You're trying to convince the audience.