That’s the vibe I get as well. If you make this a dryad or some goddess instead of an octillery, you basically have the origin story of a Greek hero.
Octillery isn’t too surprising, given the infamy of tentacles as a part of Japanese porn. It is maybe a little surprising that it’s male human/female Octillery, rather than the other way around.
I haven’t read any of the leaks other than the one in this post, but just judging from this, I would believe it if someone told me these were loose retellings of actual Japanese folktales.
You'd think the failed attempts would discourage these retards. One guy got his brains blown out, another was captured after being shot at by SS.
I figure you have to be some combination of willing to end your life and either hungry for infamy or truly devoted to a political cause to be willing to do any high profile assassination at all, so that’s not necessarily a discouragement for the right kind of guy. For the failed attempts, maybe the second one should have been a warning that security stepped up their game, but if anything, the first one would have had me thinking “wow, this guy’s security is way worse than I would have assumed!”
If she’s not interested in dating you but she wants a free meal and she puts out because she thinks that’s her end of the bargain, it’s whoring. If she isn’t interested in dating you, but she puts out because she wants a one night stand and/or is super horny, it’s slutty. If she is interested in dating you and the chemistry is really good so she puts out on the first date because you’re both having a great time, it still leans towards slutty but it’s not always as much of a red flag as the other two scenarios.
Note how the complaint is always “well, they’re too big,” but the fix has gone and removed them entirely. She has the torso of a man now.
Lara Croft pre boob reduction seems like the obvious answer here.
Who you think 'wins' says more about you than about the participants.
Sounds like what someone who's never won would say.
And yet, you haven't joined any of the ideologies you repeatedly lose internet slapfights to....
I’m not inclined to believe Sandy Hook was a hoax, because—as we’ve seen in other cases—“fail to stop some mentally ill person from committing a crime you’ve enabled/prodded him to commit” is a tactic they use, and it seems so much easier and has so much less risk than setting up a bunch of crisis actors to pretend for decades that a fake shooting happened. The only thing that makes me believe it may have been fake is the way they’ve gone after Jones for broadcasting exactly that idea. I suspect that that was more because it’s something they decided they could go after Jones on, rather than because of Sandy Hook specifically. If they could get sympathetic frogs claiming emotional damage, they would have sued him over the “turning the frogs gay” line.
“Racist” and “homophobic” are good, actually.
The problem is that you show “blatant extreme hostility” to basically everyone that says, say, “lolisho is gross and shouldn’t be allowed,” or any number of positions that you could disagree with in far less extreme ways. You also frequently fail to articulate your positions in any way beyond this extreme hostility. Even when you aren’t yelling at someone for daring to question the morality of naked drawings that look like kids, you have a habit of making link posts that jump in to an argument you’re having several comments deep, or halfway through threads about extremely niche internet figures, without explaining anything and just assuming everyone gets it and agrees with you.
In short, the things you’ve accused this guy of are worrying, but I also don’t trust your ability to respond proportionally or to explain things rationally, so why should I not be skeptical of this?
Bluntly, you express everything with such vitriol, obsession, and general spergery that it makes me reflexively inclined to take positions against you on the matters I don’t already have opinions on, and displeased to find you as my ally on some of the positions I do.
Some of it is reaction time and ability to read small, quick motions. I’m not sure how trainable that is.
I'm guessing this is implied by your statement about not being woke and retarded, but I think it's worth making explicit too: that story can be cool, but should probably be written from an ultimate perspective of "this one clone is fucked in the head, and we're either doing a story that includes the mild body horror/ethical issues part of cloning or we're trying to fix this as a plot point." Trannydom is a mental illness, and an incredibly destructive one at that.
But were they really?
True enough, perhaps her guard is slipping. Although my guess is that she just cares less about video games than she does about other media.
Rowling usually maintains pretty tight control over her work, though. In fact, this quote is part of the article, from that same guy:
“And I think maybe there’s some other creative possibilities within this world, but J.K. Rowling controls all of it and is not going to let anyone else come play with her toys. And that’s her right and is obviously very profitable for her. So that’s what we get.”
I think this means that their ability to subvert is limited. They’ll be stuck with doing stuff Rowling agrees to, which I would expect means we might see a “more diverse” main trio—she’s signed off on a black Hermiome before—and we might see the insertion of extra gay stuff for Dumbledore, or maybe some Jewish students, or anything that plays into her habit of grafting in extra brownie points things that didn’t really exist in the original versions. What we probably won’t see is wholesale departure from or subversion of major plot points and character traits. We won’t get “actually, James Potter was kind of a douche,” we won’t get trannies, etc.
Halo 4 was bad. Not necessarily the actual gameplay, although there were at least some bad parts there. The lore. A core idea of the original trilogy was that you’re in the shadow of giants. The Forerunners existed on a scale so far beyond humanity and the Covenant that it’s laughable. There’s a throwaway line early on when you meet 343 Guilty Spark about how the Chief—wearing the pinnacle of human engineering—is in something like a level three combat suit, and should really upgrade to at least an eight. The Forerunner technology we run into in the little drone guys, the Flood as it exists in modern times, these are all remnants of a long dead glory and a long-passed war.
And then in Halo 4 you fight the superweapon robots created by the most fervent warlord the Forerunners had, and they die no problem just like everything else. It’s lame.
Also, I know that it was at least alluded to before and the possibility of Cortana going insane was not completely out of left field, but man, we didn’t need to see it. We didn’t need confirmation that sorry, that character you like, your near-constant companion, really does die like that. “Wake me if you need me” was the perfect ending, they didn’t need to fuck with it at all, but they did.
I assume offensive acting means stuff like pretend rape, pretend racism, etc. but I like to imagine it means porn acting that is just so so bad it’s potentially criminal.
Day[9] and Husky come to mind as the giants of the casting scene. Pretty much everyone was playing second to them, as I remember it. And then if you ask me to pick third place, it would probably be TotalBiscuit. His commentary wasn’t quite as engaging, but it was still good, and I loved that he put huge “anti-spoiler” chunks of black screen at the end of his videos.
I don’t think Destiny was really on my radar at all.
That’s not anime, that’s one of those horrible “cartoonify you” apps.
But are you talking about a specific dog?
I have to break the bit to make a correction: while the US Navy also hires fags, the ship in question is part of the NZ Navy.
Tolkein’s laundry list would still be better written than Rings of Power.
She literally said the meme?