Alright let's go down the list:

1. No bad idea, the UK is one of those countries run better as a monarchy with it interwoven with tradition, better you just get someone in the line who can be turned to be very patriotic, William's kids are still young enough to do that. Plus you want to explain to the Brits their taxes increase thanks to no monarchy?

2. Yep but can't use mental health as a restriction as that can be easily manipulated. How many Islamic attacks have been called 'a mental health issue'

3. You could just use a cargo plane and airdrop them into their country, that's more practical

4. Be more effective if you remove the restrictions off their opponents and have strong self defence laws, really not as strong when their enemy can fight back

5. Yeah Asylums are required again unfortunately

6. I don't like porn that uses real people for the shear amount of corruption with it from trafficking to grooming kids but the ban was idiotic. Hopefully people just move to AI but people just switched from porn studios to onlyfans

7. Eh, go by the more restrictive ones in the US where I believe it's 4-6 weeks, 1 week seems too draconian without the moral infrastructure set up.

8. We can dream but yeah not happening, more likely their Islamic 'pets' kill them as they can't be controlled.

And knowing the British normies, they'll only win if instead of all of this promise stronger self defence laws, less censorship by state and a visa requirement to come to the UK with required stay at a designated border country for refugees as your list is too extreme without the build up socially to accept it.