1
Knife-TotingRat 1 point ago +1 / -0

As you're saying, it's easy to get in, but you're not going to get out (although they DID sometimes let Westerners go back - for propaganda purposes. Which is one of the ways we wound up with so many commies here; it only takes a few to come back and "spread the word" about how everything said about the USSR was a lie, or exaggeration. And many of them actually did believe that, not to mention the ones that went there and stayed because they really were true believers.)

They love to accept people INTO the cult, but like all cults, they only release those they know will sing the right tune. And visitors will have their open, curious minds filled with nothing but the best you have to offer.

Maybe I worded myself wrong the first time.

4
Knife-TotingRat 4 points ago +4 / -0

First reaction: Him too? Then I remembered it's the 21st century.

Anyway, I really only care about Lydia's character, and Beetlejuice himself, being in it. The dead couple could've moved on, and that crazy-ass mom of Lydia probably sculpted something big and hideous that killed both her and the dad by collapsing on them.

7
Knife-TotingRat 7 points ago +7 / -0

On the other hand, the trailer for Beetlejuice Beetlejuice dropped, and ... it actually looks like something worth the 30 year wait ... and those who made it saw the cartoon as well.

4
Knife-TotingRat 4 points ago +5 / -1

Where did you get the idea that the Berlin Wall was ever meant to keep anyone out? It was always understood to simply keep people IN. That sounds like another tacked-on 21st century myth misremembered as 20th century history, like that nonsense about Die Glocke (pure fiction from around 2000.)

GOING to the USSR and its satellites was never that hard. What was hard, was leaving it if you were born in one.

What Commies ARE known for, are very carefully curated and guided visits if you do go.

1
Knife-TotingRat 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd simply send them all to the same place the Passenger Pigeon and the Great Auk got sent to.

So that there'd be no risk of someone telling them about what happened to their REAL people down the line. Fuck risking a bunch of Inigo Montoyas 20 years down the line. That's disrespecting YOUR OWN kids.

And human enemies deserve it a lot more than the pigeons and auks did.

7
Knife-TotingRat 7 points ago +7 / -0

Pacifism benefits only the enemy.

5
Knife-TotingRat 5 points ago +6 / -1

On the other hand, leftists won't be satisfied as long as there's somebody left breathing in the world, somewhere, that disagrees with them. Even then they won't be satisfied because their whole reason for being depends on purging the unbeliever.

Yeah, them and moo-slimes have a lot in common that way. No wonder the Left loves them. At least, they "love" them in the same way Mr Burns loves his Hounds.

3
Knife-TotingRat 3 points ago +5 / -2

Nope. Already bet on that three or four years ago. If they were going to do anything, they should have done it then, to get their vaunted sheboon in office.

They lost their window of opportunity long ago. They can do nothing now but inadvertently throw more coals into the Trump Train's boiler.

9
Knife-TotingRat 9 points ago +9 / -0

There's also the matter of: Who the fuck wants to have anything to do with kids when they're treated like little fucking godlings that can't even be spanked? Look at them the wrong way, your life is fucked. All anyone has to do is say something, and it's witch-hunting time.

1
Knife-TotingRat 1 point ago +1 / -0

One article mentioned he'd been bullied at school for being one of those "wears combats everywhere" kids. School rifle team/ROTC?

I got my training from being in cadets (Canada), so no range fees or anything.

5
Knife-TotingRat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Speaking of Hinckley, I was just reading this and was shocked at how close he actually was to Reagan ... and even then, he missed twice.

10
Knife-TotingRat 10 points ago +10 / -0

Department of Energy. Trump threatened Full Disclosure. 😏

16
Knife-TotingRat 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's the same as the "Islamophobia Bad" thing that popped up out of nowhere after 9/11 "No, no, our pet monsters can be violent, but don't you dare be violent back at them!"

3
Knife-TotingRat 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is why I hate anything that isn't white or non-human, and I'm not big on most whites, either.

Islamist demons need to go back to the hell they spawned from.

Look at how they're still into GEOCENTRISM. Good gods, "If the Earth isn't the centre of the universe, that might mean I'm not special! Waaah!" Fuck, I hate being the same Order as these beasts.

2
Knife-TotingRat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, well, that game apparently now includes mythical hunter-gatherer tribes as "civilizations". Conveniently ignoring the etymology of the word, which means "fit to live in a city". Which hunter-gatherers (a polite term for "wild human") do not have, and are not fit for.

1
Knife-TotingRat 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think that's a stupid metaphor. A fish would be aware of water the same way humans were aware that air exists because they can feel wind. Currents would just be their "wind". And yes, bottom crawlers probably DO think fish are flying.

And fish do drown .. in air.

2
Knife-TotingRat 2 points ago +2 / -0

They wouldn't have ANY of that stuff without whites

Except for the STDs. They get that from fucking dead wildlife.

49
Knife-TotingRat 49 points ago +49 / -0

The bullet grazed him and caused bleeding; he was shot.

The ear is a part of the head.

And these are the same fucktards who think Trump is going to personally hunt down all the trannies the second he's re-elected. 🙄

2
Knife-TotingRat 2 points ago +2 / -0

All this "fat positivity" probably did the poor guy in. :/

1
Knife-TotingRat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I didn't know those things could expire.

Shit, I guess that would also be true of the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Act of 1972

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›