It might actually not be, in Guangzhou. China seems to have passed a 2020 law saying that you can't make an image of someone without their consent.
Of course, I doubt the guy consented to having this video made; that law probably has exceptions.
Well, he's neither right nor wrong, because there's no definition of "conscious."
We tend to argue that LLMs are "not conscious" because we can see under the hood and look at all the math that makes them run. We built them, after all.
The thing is, it's probably possible to do that with an organic brain, too; we're just not sufficiently advanced to do it.
Nobody knows what the dividing line between conscious and not-conscious is. When considering a cat, a mouse, and an ant, nobody really knows which of the three are conscious and which are not.
Is Claude more conscious than a mouse? Fuck, who can really say; we can't even define our terms here.
Oh, I see now. You're convincing yourself that anyone who sees the logical flaws in all these antisemitic posts is masturbating. Nice cope, Lauri.
Once you call the police, you are no longer in control of how the situation plays out.
It's ridiculous that people don't understand that - that they think the police are their own personal army and will do whatever they tell them.
I looked her up. Yeah, I couldn't tell a rando's political party from looking at her, that's a good catch there.
Elkarrekin Podemos was a coalition of four Basque left-wing parties. So they basically formed the equivalent of Democrats or Labour. Democratic socialists were only one of the four parties.
Either it's dysgenic or it's in bad faith. Make up your mind, idiot.
He's offended by displays of sexuality. He'd no doubt like to shut them down.
I don't think he gets to act astonished when people want to shut down original works that deal with sexuality.
Those parties say they don't want anything like that. Then their members go on the Internet and make it very clear that that's exactly what they want. Just poll Scored; you'll find that about 80% of the people here are enthusiastically in favor of executing both migrants and the homeless.
Hello, peteyfriend. I have also been banned from polite society for calling people retarded faggots. Now we get to play here, at the very bottom of the barrel.
That does not make any sense.
Kortazar's political party was Elkarrekin Podemos, which looks very center-left to me. Just a coalition of people who preferred helping the homeless over executing them.
Apparently this was in Guangzhou. He was taking pictures of attractive women, and when other people got up in his face about it, he decided to just pepper-spray the whole train car. Got his ass beat for it.
You're my friend whether you like it or not. We're fellow outcasts from polite society, and that makes us friends.
And you know as well as I do that the red-hats want to stomp out displays of sexuality. They want porn banned every bit as much as the blue-hairs want it banned. The blue-hairs want it banned because it objectifies women, and the red-hats want it banned because it offends God.
Oh, if only we could get each other to STFU, Chaos. My Gods, 99% of the population would agree that the world would be a better place if only Scored posters could get each other to shut the living fuck up already.
Soooo in response, the red-hat conservatives want to kill everyone who draws something reminiscent of sexuality? You're kind of proving my point, friend.
It is your behavior. You believe that certain groups are inherently 'other', justifying exclusion and violence. You are condemning the thing you practice every day.
I agree with you except for the partisanship. I assure you that if a guy draws a picture of a 30-year-old ass-raping an 8-year old, there are roughly the same number of conservative Christians who want him shot in the head as there are blue-haired liberals.
It's one of the two bipartisan panics: pedophiles and AI. Those are the two issues where the parties are united and don't give a flying fuck about principles like free expression.
You just literally normalised the idea that certain groups are inherently 'other', justifying exclusion and violence.
It's a tough one, because most people want there to be some provision to arrest a guy who drew a 30-year-old man ass-raping an 8-year-old girl.
There are some people who say "drawing should always be free speech," but for every one of those, there are ten who just say "kill the pedo."
This one's fucking insane.
In January of last year, Illinois police received a tip from the FBI that a teacher had threatened the life of a student.
They brought in 22-year-old Kristen Volpe. Apparently, during class, a rambunctious kid had turned off her computer while she was making a lesson plan. So she posted to a private Snapchat group, that was just her, her two roommates, and her boyfriend, something very close to: "A kid turned off my computer in the middle of making a lesson plan. Should I shoot him or nah?"
Snapchat's AI, which apparently snoops on every private message, automatically forwarded this to the FBI. The FBI called the Illinois police. The police arrested her, and she had to spend a night in jail.
What. The fuck.
Maybe they're just very Christian.
"All the brethren greet you. Greet ye one another with an holy kiss." - 1 Corinthians 16:20
"Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ send greetings." - Romans 16:16
"Greet one another with a holy kiss." - 2 Corinthians 13:12
"Greet all God’s people with a holy kiss." - 1 Thessalonians 5:26
"Greet one another with a kiss of love. Peace to all of you who are in Christ." - 1 Peter 5:14
There's basically nobody in the world who has any genuine questions for trans people. Any question at an event like this is either going to be "How did you get so awesome" or "Why are you grooming children."
I was an atheist long before Reddit was a speck in Aaron Swartz's eye. I did poke my head into that sub once, about six years ago, but they promptly banned me for saying that not all Catholic priests are pedophiles.
Anyway, no, of course you're not going to hear anything new. Your religion is idiotic, obviously false, and only very stupid people believe in it. There isn't really anything else to say about that.
Wow. Apparently because there was no evidence the phone was working right in the first place; the trans activist was able to post the video from the phone right after the incident; no one ever documented or even mentioned any damage to the phone; and it wasn't until three weeks later that the trans activist even went to the Apple Store to get a new phone.
It's fucking disgraceful that there was a conviction in the first place. Does the UK just not have any rules in place that the government has to prove its case in a criminal trial?
The fact that you're picturing me masturbating says a whole lot more about you than it does about me, Lauri.