2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't disagree with you, but I think we're talking about "former lefties" at two different times.

The recent converts, yes, because they still haven't challenged any of the foundational myths. This is where you get the dissident voice going "feminism went awry in the 3rd wave!" These are "the Left left me" types. They are the ones who have been emotionally conditioned to feel like they belong on the Left, and try to go back and eventually realize they can't.

The ones who actually challenge those myths are the ones I'm talking about. I forget his name now, but it was the the lawyer who's friend was raped and murdered by several Black Panther members, and realized that not only did any of his Lefty friends want to investigate it, but neither did the police. Those are the ones who tell you to just keep throwing hands.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

Zionism isn't even really brought up because that has nothing to do with Hitlers views on jews. Seriously, how are you all this fucking stupid about a guy you literally fucking worship? Hitlers opposition to jews is that they are a Capitalist race.

Let's not pretend you don't already operate under "rules for thee and not for me".

5
Gizortnik 5 points ago +6 / -1

Unironically yes.

Where you see raping and pillaging, you see a catholic priest typically behind making post hoc rationalizations why it's totes okay this time. For Protestants, it would be the king explicitly doing the same thing after he's seized control of the church or declared himself the sole representative of God.

For the Norse, it was standard, it was common place, and it was moral to do so without justification.

-22
Gizortnik -22 points ago +3 / -25

Stop being a fucking retard you disingenuous faggot. He literally didn't see the knife. Several of the victims didn't know they had been stabbed, just like in most knife attacks.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +7 / -4

The only effective defense against a knife wielding attacker is a gun. Everything else is just bullshit for show.

Unless you have a wicked spinning back-kick. And even then it's only time and place conditional.

Anyways, it's as if you just shouldn't let these people in your country.

6
Gizortnik 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because the reason they are there in the first place is because their degeneracy was known, and was promised to be protected by the individual who placed them there.

It's a standard method of authoritarian control. Whomever hired him knew he would do this, probably once a year. This incident just happened to not be able to be covered up.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +4 / -3

That's probably quite wrong, and the criticism is probably more along the lines of Nietzsche decrying Christianity as a religion that worships weakness, and promotes slave morality, placing agency outside of the self.

I don't necessarily agree with Nietzsche's interpretation, though I get what he's aiming for, but the solution is probably not to return to a simple "might makes right" morality where you should kill anyone who challenges you, and enrich yourself with the enslavement of anyone who can't stop you, which is where a lot of that mindset inevitably leads, as aptly demonstrated in The Melian Dialogue, when that mindset was already the norm, and spooked the Athenians on just how fucking psychotic it really was. All you have to do is listen to the English recounting the Viking raids to understand how Norse morality might actually be a level of wicked that would probably deserve it's destruction and ruination.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +2 / -1

I wouldn't call it art. If you're gonna push political messaging, at the very least, allow for some kind of appearance of artistic storytelling, metaphor, and interpretation. Otherwise, it's a lecture.

As the comic stands, that lecture is subtle, so long as you spelled subtlety, like this.

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

FEMA is not fit for purpose, and thus must be washed away with as much aggression at Ashville, NC was; and the people who work in it should be treated with a similar level of callousness.

6
Gizortnik 6 points ago +6 / -0

When people survive the Left's attempts to lynch them, they realize they don't actually have all that much to fear, and start throwing fucking hands.

This is why so many on the right who are it's strongest fighters, were hardcore Lefties at one point.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

The CIA version of Pravda.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, you're making excuses. Don't stand here and pretend that you believe Zionism is an element of Globalism, when Zionism is a nationalist movement.

You don't think Globalism exists. You don't really even believe in Zionism, either. You think all of it just an extension of genetic jewry and literally nothing else. Literally nothing, and no one, else. Zero other areas of nuance. If an single jew exists, then and only then does globalism exist, and not as a legitimate ideology, but as a quick post-hoc rationalization for one jew to kill all life and civilization on the planet.

Please fuck-off with your tiny mustache man version of Jessie Ventura going "Vee ah only asking quvestionz!"

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +4 / -2

Honestly, Israel knocking out Iran's nuclear capacity really isn't a lose for any of us beyond the regionalization of the war (which seems to already have happened). If they managed to succeed (which is still a serious "if"), it would keep Iran from using tactical nukes any time soon, or developing their enrichment procedures.

You're gonna have to undo the damage done by Biden, and this would be the fastest way. Since it's not the US striking the Iranians, it isn't officially an action on our front, and can't be used to justify bringing the Americans into the war. In fact, there'd be a large argument of "Israel doesn't need our help, they're just going to keep defeating Arab/Persian armies like normal."

This would certainly be a more difficult attack than what they did on Iraq's Osirak reactor. (Interesting note: that's actually what the latest Top Gun movie was based on).

5
Gizortnik 5 points ago +6 / -1

Let me re-phrase that. I think specific people benefit from this policy. Like, Joe and Hunter embezzle x number of money (or like we see in Ukraine, the Ukranians embezzle it, invest it into a ponzi scheme, and then the ponzi scheme distributes funds to share blue).

But we're not war profiteering as a nation. We're not doing like what Trump did, where we promised to sell millions of dollars in arms to the Saudis for their war in Yemen, because it would keep defense contractors employed. I think the corruption is actually more specific than that.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

AoC is absolutely meant to be one of those throw aways. Strangely enough, it seems like the division that existed between the LBJ establishment (continuing from FDR and the Fabian socialists), and the Freedom Democrats (the Socialists and Communists) is still the same division. The difference is that the LBJ side of Neo-Liberalism is physically dying, and the Communist Radicals of the 1970's are the ones who enshrined their power, but have been blown back so often that they are why both Regan and Nixon had the wins they did. Now, it's Trump's turn and they still don't get it, and todays batch of revolutionaries were trained by straight up terrorists. Which means they are effectively too radical to even hold, or understand, power.

Leading us to the situation we are in now.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

Communists, like wolves, hunt in packs.

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is it really any more spicy than "Our country is run by a matriarchy of childless cat ladies?" Meh.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

I kinda was hoping Vance would say that in the VP debate. I knew it wouldn't happen, but I wished it was so.

14
Gizortnik 14 points ago +15 / -1

This shit is why I keep saying that they are trying to suicide bomb the dissident right.

Even if you believe in accelerationism, which is stupid, willfully choosing to lose each battle is not the way to achiever either progress or acceleration.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, yeah. A lot of people weren't paying attention, and thought it stopped at a rogue Community Manager. That was never the case.

Many, many, such cases.

14
Gizortnik 14 points ago +16 / -2

If this were a form of war profiteering, at least it would make sense to sell weapons to both sides.

Instead, we just give free money to both sides, and literally zero people benefit.

-8
Gizortnik -8 points ago +3 / -11

It does speak to your blindness as a collective, though.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›