Good lord this was completely unfunny.
I will say that I'm a bit blown away how they really did understand that the fake news has only one purpose: emotional manipulation of the audience.
It's too bad that they won't criticize that, and have instead internalized it.
Don't forget their rampant dishonesty. They can't even have a funny conversation. They find someone they hope is the stupidest person in the known universe, then interview them for an hour, make a bunch of nasty comments to them, edit it down to 1 minute of material that they hope makes them look smart (and inherently correct as all their opinions are), that they will sometimes interject with their own running commentary; then use that to belittle everyone who doesn't believe what they do.
And that's just their own, immediate, dishonesty. They also cherry-pick evidence, don't give full context, refuse to address counter-points, and rely on biased research which re-frames every topic to maintain the latest leftist narrative.
I don't buy it. "I was being completely reasonable, and then something triggered the liberal snowflake in my family for no reason, and my wife was upset that only he was yelling in our argument" sounds like literally every fake argument in every fake left-wing political cartoon to ever exist.
It's some literal Triangle Is Victorious shit.
There appears to be a distribution list of black people. I will henceforth refer to it as DIST_Blacks.
I have MANY questions.
- Who made DIST_Blacks?
- Why was DIST_Blacks made?
- Where is DIST_Blacks currently stored?
- How do the administrators of DIST_Blacks determine who can be a member of DIST_Blacks?
- How many other companies, governments, NGO's, or CRMs are aware of DIST_Blacks?
- The answers to these questions are required to be known before launching an attack. How would white supremacists know any of the answers to these questions?
Your story is so retarded that you sound like an instigating faggot that starts fights with your family, while espousing nothing of actual detail about the topics or conversation.
You genuinely come across as a Leftist pretending to be a rightoid voicing the heel character in the story that totally happened.
Literally: "Hello fellow National Socialists! Seig Heil! Have any of you heard of Nick Fuentes or Patriot Front! I think that's how we'll own the libs!"
This goes back to my arguments of a stratified government. The federal government shouldn't make laws outside of direct regulation of the states, and the states should be voting on that and only that alone.
Your local government is set up to settle your disputes. Your regional government settles disputes of the local governments. The state settles disputes of regional governments. The federal government settles disputes of states. Voting goes one step up, enforcement goes one step down. The 10th amendment needs to be aggressively strengthened.
People are not necessarily good at judging policy (otherwise socialism would never have worked).
BUT, they do tend to have a "bullshit detector" or "psycho detector" that they've developed over their lives. This is why Amber Herd was doing so well against Johnny Depp until her trail got televised. Then everybody saw through her bullshit almost instantly. This is one of the reasons why so many courts fight to guarantee that juries physically see people testify in front of them, not even over videos or recorded statements.
Not talking about topics allows people to gather an intuition on somebody who is no longer trying to hide who they are, because they don't think the topic is important. You can tell a lot from somebody who is talking off the cuff about something they care about.
But people like Harris can't do that because they are fake people. She's a complete fraud, and she knows it, and she's so insecure that she requires constant affirmation and is wildly intolerant of anyone who doesn't placate her. Or worse, like Walz, they fucking crazy. I maintain that Walz is extremely violent. The little reaction he gave to his disabled kid on stage was something I've seen in a hundred abusive parents. His, dumb, plucky, middle-school football coach act wasn't going to fool me after that. That's a dude who throws chairs at walls when he gets angry. His nearly shaking & red with rage response in the VP debate had me fucking nervous for Vance's safety.
This is the only useful source I found on this matter: https://www.startribune.com/duluth-mn-five-people-boys-shot-to-death-west-suicide-two-households/601177932
Nephew posted regularly to Facebook, sometimes about political frustrations. He was a self-described independent who opposed Donald Trump. In July, he wrote that his mental health and the world can no longer peacefully coexist, “and a lot of the reason is religion.”
“I am terrified of religious zealots inflicting their misguided beliefs on me and my family,” he wrote. “I have intrusive thoughts of being burned at the stake as a witch, or crucified on a burning cross, or my absolute favorite[:] Having people actually believe that I or my child are Satan or, the anti-Christ or whatever their favorite color of boogie man they are afraid are this week.
Even as an anti-theist, I can see why a Christian would look at this man and say, "He was possessed by a demon that tricked him into straying from God and dragging him to hell."
It may not be a duck, but if it swims like duck, and quacks like a duck...
Ain't that a shame.
Alexa, play Fats Domino
Absolutely no chance.
Free speech is a purely American, and 20th century concept. No one, anywhere else in the world, has what we have. They might have gotten close to it in the late 20th century, but with Hate Speech laws and other forms of political censorship in the rest of the world... the concept just doesn't exist. The rest of the planet already doesn't accept free speech.
Europe, indeed the rest of the Anglosphere, has to be dragged kicking and screaming into tolerating dissent.
What's kinda sad is how much 4chan seems to have just completely abandoned that energy level from 2016. There were a lot of black-pill and doomer comments even in the pictures.
The 2020 election cycle ended up having more memetic energy, more public enthusiasm, and more effect than the 2016 one did; and yet I kept hearing everyone who as deeply involved with 2016 basically saying that Trump was low energy. I'll grant you he wasn't absolutely beating the hell out of Jeb Bush, but he gave himself a more toned down approach to bring in normies (and he's 8 years older). I feel like a lot of people still want to see 2016 edgy Trump again, but that's basically been gone since 2018-2019.
I said it before. Malicious compliance. Someone inside knew it was bullshit, and recorded every little detail they could by official means, and leaked it to the press to make sure that if Discovery was pursued at trial, the destruction of the revealed evidence is actionable.
Thank you, that's all we really wanted.