4
Gizortnik 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you're okay with Childless Cat Ladies, you are the problem.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +4 / -1

I think even they knew how silly this was, and started ad-libbing.

10
Gizortnik 10 points ago +10 / -0

Well, this makes ad really makes a lot of sense.

  • Scrawny liberal
  • Horribly obese male feminist
  • Gay black man
  • Gay white man
  • Old Hippie who still thinks it's 1971
  • ?????
  • Win 2024 election
3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +4 / -1

"Oh, well, if it's the scientific consensus, then it must be true. I'm not a science denier. I fucking love science."

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's it, though. Their slaves are like that. They don't actually know any young men. It's like how feminists hate men because they think that the "best" men are male feminists. And if that's the ceiling of quality, than almost anything is better.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

If she went onto CoD, someone is going to call her a Pajeegro Slag, and video games will be banned by Executive Order.

6
Gizortnik 6 points ago +7 / -1

Undecided voter: "Trump farts?!! Good lord, that's horrifically unpresidential. Next you're going to tell me that women poop!"

16
Gizortnik 16 points ago +16 / -0

"Trusted Flagger" should be considered a slur as offensive as "Nigger Faggot".

The Left used to call them "stool pigeons".

Imagine a society run by professional reddit and discord moderators, and you wonder why civilization is dying.

"You know who should be in charge of everything I think, do, say, read, and hear? Reddit's Troon Goons. Those are clearly my moral superiors, and the sole arbiters of truth in society."

16
Gizortnik 16 points ago +16 / -0

#freespeech needs reasonable restraints

The only legitimate response to this comment, under any circumstance, is "kill yourself".

Free Speech has always meant "rejection of viewpoint discrimination by the state". The very act of making a restriction of any kind is the abolition of free speech. And as you say, OP, his "reasonable restraint" is the criminalization of the opposition.

15
Gizortnik 15 points ago +15 / -0

That Sure Is One Way to Convince Young Men Not to Vote for Donald Trump

They hate you.

They think, "oh, young men are retarded goon-cave goblins that are stupid enough to believe ads on a porn site. Let's advertise there. They don't have real problems like wages, career outlook, finding a home, building a family, debt relief, or fighting in the wars we start. They're just retarded little coomers. They'll do what we want because we'll run with the idea of Kamala the Dommy Mommy and they'll eat that all up."

They do not respect you. They hate you.

4
Gizortnik 4 points ago +5 / -1

I thought Hillary Clinton was a good candidate because I thought she was a ruthless political operator. I felt like she was a Democratic version of Richard Nixon.

I was dead fucking wrong, and it turns out that that was mere propaganda from her own side, and probably the State Department. She's an obsessive, self-aggrandizing, petty, idiot.

I never really had issues with Trump supporters, and it was the accelerating hysterical response to Trump that shocked me the most. They literally would. not. stop. lying! I listened to NPR respond to the Hollywood Access tapes by reporting that Donald Trump had explicitly admitted to rape. Not sexual assault. Rape. And this wasn't even an admission of anything. Even from a Leftwing perspective, the lies were so blatant it was fucking insane. I couldn't understand why anyone believed any of it.

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +4 / -2

It's not the only reason. It's just one of many reasons. A major reason is the massive profits from simping.

-6
Gizortnik -6 points ago +2 / -8

I think I disagree with that assessment even more. Women are not going to socially approve of outsiders because the likelihood of those outsiders being a threat to them is inherently high. An outsider is literally outside the social networking consensus and social status we are talking about. Women do not have that kind of high out-group preference against their own social groups, let alone family units.

A nationalist social ordering has simply not been in most women's lives, and is actively disincentivized by society at large (and the government and corporations in particular). That propaganda and psychological conditioning is the effect that causes political results to skew the way they do.

0
Gizortnik 0 points ago +3 / -3

I don't see women's psychology as pro-immigration and pro-globalism. In several European countries the populist right turned immigration into a women's safety issue, and the numbers of opposition to immigration match men's numbers. This is not a result of biology, but of psychological conditioning and heavy propaganda.

Women are being taught that globalism gives them community, and that immigrants are like infants. That is the psychological effect at play related to biology. Women don't have an innate out-preference. If anything, it's the opposite. But the infantilization of foreigners is what aligns them politically on the issue.

9
Gizortnik 9 points ago +9 / -0

LOL. Trump called him a fuckin' beta

https://truthsocial.com/@realdonaldtrump/posts/113278758050760684

BETA MALE Howard Stern made a fool of himself on his low rated radio show when he “interviewed” Lyin’ Kamala Harris, and hit her with so many SOFTBALL questions that even she was embarrassed. He looked like a real fool, working so hard to make a totally incompetent and ill-equipped person look as good as possible, which wasn’t very good. I dropped Howard a long time ago, like most others, and have since been credited with very good judgment! MAGA2024

5
Gizortnik 5 points ago +6 / -1

OP, do you have the list? I'd like to see what the top ranks actually are, and the gender divide on those.

-4
Gizortnik -4 points ago +11 / -15

Everything you said after your first sentence is wrong, but that first one is very important. You'll notice that: Titanic, 50 Shades of Gray, and Sex In The City are popularly acclaimed by women, and aren't anywhere in this list. Recency bias is part of consensus thinking, and an older consensus just isn't necessarily ever useful given new and emerging environmental threats.

Women are never enemies of Nationalism, and Nationalism has a wildly important role in women being the starting point of families and communities. The social fabric that makes up a nation must be woven by women, and protected & ordered by men.

4
Gizortnik 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Transpeople are genetic mutants of a failed experiment."

  • Disney Corporation
1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +5 / -4

It's one part of that, but it's a lot more. He represents a genuine threat to their power. They would be die-hard white supremacists if and only if it could seal their power. Difference is that white people mostly figured out that was a grift decades ago.

The White Dudes For Kamala ad, frankly shows the way they pander and talk down to black people in order to try and get their vote. The good news is that this effort is so hollow that it has no effect on most white people, let alone the white men they are trying to target.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +3 / -2

I respect faggots more than zero-effort trolls. At least a man getting his dick sucked benefits from the presence of a faggot. No one benefits from this man.

4
Gizortnik 4 points ago +5 / -1

They're less than half the country. Probably less than a third. Most of the country are useful idiots that have no idea how malicious the activist class are. Of that third that truly hate us, the vast and sweeping majority are functionally dis-educated, ideologically captured, radicals who think I am personally geocoding trans people when I don't watch Black Panther.

The real number of our true enemies is probably around less than 5%. The ones who know that they want us dead, and understand that we are not the propaganda they feed everyone else, and still want us dead.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›