No, this is far more direct than anything the Russians were even accused of. They claimed the Russians worked with Trump and WikiLeaks to steal the DNC emails, and then that prevented Hillary from winning.
In reality they ran a couple Facebook accounts, (their most popular was a BLM chapter that wasn't real) and posted a shitty Bernie Bro meme.
Arrest them as foreign agents.
Anyways, this is a problem in general with the political Left. The Canadian Left sends literally thousands of activists south every election cycle. No word on Israel, Saudi Arabia, China, or Qatar's numbers. They can't make direct donations, but there's nothing to stop activists from volunteering... well, nothing outside of the fact that it's foreign election interference but we don't do anything about that.
You ever hear of the Republican party sending even one person to any other country? Me neither.
It wasn't a softball interview, but they couldn't do that without pissing off their own audience.
Baier was basically telling her he'd throw a fast ball down the middle. That's how you "give up a pitch" and let the batter score a home run. She's just too stupid to to actually swing correctly. Baier gave her a girl boss moment with the over-talking, but she didn't take it. Follow-up questions destroyed her because Leftists are morons who rarely understand their own philosophy.
Baier, Murdoch, and all of Fox News want Trump to lose, and are working to do it, but they can't make it obvious as controlled opposition. Same way CBS can't just ride her dick the whole time. It's not a softball interview, it's a fastball interview. Only fastballs down the center were allowed to be thrown and she still the mighty Casey struck out.
I can accept a default judgement for refusing discovery, but that never happened. The individual must explicitly deny and refuse exact documents. That never happened. If that were the case, which documents were refused?
There wasn't any.
Andrew Cuomo hasn't had to answer for 45,000 counts of negligent homicide. Gretchen Whitmer 13,000. The largest corporations on Earth participated in the single largest transfer of wealth in human history since the conquistadors looted the Maya.
She isn't a completely mindless puppet. She's just a bit of an idiot.
She and Willie Brown out-maneuvered Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Obama, and Clinton. The stolen Trump policies and pandering are all signature moves of Willie Brown. Biden was looking worse and worse before the debate, and Nancy was actually looking to push him out and get someone else in. Nancy wanted Shapiro, Obama's surrogate we're not clear about, and Clinton didn't mind Harris. Harris helped Pelosi push Biden out, then immediately betrayed Nancy and took over the Biden-Harris political organization to seize the funds and declare victory. Harris stole the candidacy while Obama was getting his shoes on, and Nancy thought they could have a competitive primary. But Harris fucked all of them over.
Remember, this woman is an evil prosecutor that likes to keep innocent people in prison, and sell her allied companies prison labor for kick-backs. She's a bit of an idiot, but with Willie Brown at her side, she's a bit of a ruthless actor. It's Willie who wants the white house. Biden, Nancy, and Pelosi were all left out to dry.
Problem is, this effort is too big of a challenge for any of them, let alone Willie Brown's cocksleve.
I agree with most of that. I don't think they are trying to steal the senate or house, but they are absolutely determined to lose it.
President Mike Johnson after a Trump & Vance removal really wouldn't be all that bad for the deep state. And the likely Dem candidates are as radical as they come.
Frankly, Bair interrupting her could have given her the boss girl moment she wanted... but she's too stupid and emotionally unhinged to understand how to handle it.
Everything out of her staff says she's an entitled prick who really does boss people around, is occasionally drunk, and screams at people.
Why did she agree to that?
She wanted to win over the Neo-Con establishment, who are voting for her, but she's retarded and doesn't understand how to placate them. She's making a big push for "Republicans for Harris", and that's why she isn't disavowing Dick Cheney's endorsement.
Is the leftist bubble that strong that she did not expect questions on immigration or economy?
No, but the Leftist bubble is strong enough that they think the answers she gave would be adequate enough.
There was a part where she said the experts agree that her economic plan will increase economy unlike Trump and she did not expect to be asked what she did for the past 3.5 years if she can save the economy.
Those experts are literally Goldman Sachs carrying water for one of their slave candidates.
Leftists are horrific at being able to handle follow-up questions. This is known.
They're not just trying to shut this account down. For months, they've been saying that they should gain control over the account so that they can post using his name and likeness.
They want to steal his face and wear him as a skin suit.
Wrong again. One of those people he was being sued by was a federal agent that was never present at the shooting and was never named by Trump.
he never breached the rules of litigation. The judges orders on discovery were unconstitutionally broad as it was, Alex complied with those orders, then provided more than was necessary. The prosecution claimed this was still not enough despite having several million pages of documents of everything the corporation had ever done, all of it's financial statements, all of it's marketing material, millions of emails, and the full contents of Jones' personal cellphone. So, the judge being a rabid political activist saw to protect this persecution from a jury trial and made a default judgement.
So yeah, the feds.
Don't fucking pretend that this exact strategy wasn't attempted in each of Donald Trump's trials.
Complete bullshit.
He absolutely answered questions and complied with discovery. He provided more discovery information than anyone in American legal history. He turned over millions of documents, and his attorney even provided his full cellphone. At one point the prosecution demanded he provide information that simply didn't exist. This is one of the reasons that they were asking for 1.3 Trillion dollars initially. They invented a conspiracy theory that he was one of the richest men on planet Earth, then when he didn't prove that their case, the judge defaulted against him.
He couldn't discharge his debts in bankruptcy because the amount is more than the GDP of France, and more than is physically capable of being provided to him. The retarded faggot prosecutors are fighting with each other about who gets to claim the lion's share of the business.
If he had followed the rules the other side would have had to prove actual malice.
Bullshit. They didn't need to prove actual malice because they got to declare it.
Congratulations sucking on the barrel of the gun that you will be shot with. This mechanism was a test-run of what they tried (and have partially succeeded in doing) to Donald Trump. You are next to get this treatment. Don't cry to us when you lose your home because you personally can't pay fines that are worth more than the gross lifetime income of you, your family, your friends, your employees, your rental properties, and businesses, combined, times 100.
No, you get Daniel Shaver by engaging in criminal misconduct and shooting an unarmed individual who was begging for his life. If that's "200%", anyone at 200%, at any time, should be in prison.
Being at 200% around American blacks is unnecessary, and will likely lead to brutality, abuse, and neglect of innocent people. If "200%" gives you Daniel Shaver, there is no ethical justification for creating a black Daniel Shaver.
All you have to do is treat people in a procedurally fair way. Racial stereotyping has nothing to contribute. Training, data, and experience doesn't promote racial stereotyping, it eliminates it. It's not going to be a stereotype that cops are going to rely on to make decisions in the field. They are going to rely on the knowledge of how criminals and normal people operate and behave in their specific communities. "X group is 15% more likely to y" is simply too broad of a statistic to be applied to real life local situations. Instead, it has to be "w people, who live in x community, at y time of night, will be patrolling z streets in cars of 4 people if they are looking for a drive by."
This gets worse if the community is homogenous. Now your stereotype is entirely useless. If the cop, the prosecutor, the judge, the witness, the victim, the victims grieving family, the suspect, and the uninvolved bystander are all black; then stereotyping means nothing. Unless we are going to tell the black cop that he should treat the grieving victims family like Daniel Shaver because "he can never relax".
For the most part, they shit-up forums enough as it is, to the point that they harass and annoy non faggot users to leave because it's a toxic and shitty environment. If they don't get kicked, they squat until they are allowed to conquer the forum, and then ban anyone who doesn't agree with them. If they get banned, they cry hysterically that the world is against them, feeding their victim mentality.
This is a reminder that Steele was requested to conduct opposition research on Donald Trump by the Jeb Bush campaign, and it was suggested originally by John McCain.
Jeb didn't use it, that is when he sold it to Fusion GPS, who gave it to the DNCC. That's when a member of their staff met with FBI agents to make the accusation that Trump was working with Russia. Their own forensics team dismissed the thing as absolute hogwash, but the FBI falsified their own FISA warrant in order to get a judge to approve wire-tapping the Trump campaign.
This is a little different in that it is FAR more direct.