It was literally in the same decade as the mass influx of black immigrants you intentionally obtuse moron.
No, it took place several decades earlier.
Did people flee California after the mass amnesty bill or after the continued result of a democrat stronghold?
Nope, they only fled after Leftist policies had long since destroyed the state, like I said.
See, here's the thing. Most white people aren't all that concerned about race. Even from earlier time periods.
Article from the Telegraph:
A grandfather jailed for violent disorder and abusing police at an anti-immigration riot this summer has become the first rioter to die in prison.
Peter Lynch, 61, described as a conspiracy theorist at his court hearing, is believed to have taken his own life on Saturday night at HMP Moorland near Doncaster in south Yorkshire, according to prison service sources.
Lynch was jailed for two years and eight months on Aug 22 after pleading guilty to violent disorder in a hearing at Sheffield Crown Court.
The court was told Lynch went to the Holiday Inn Express in Manvers, Rotherham, on Aug 4 with a placard which called police officers, MPs and the media “corrupt”.
Lynch shouted “racist and provocative remarks” towards officers and called asylum seekers in the hotel “child killers”, the Recorder of Sheffield, Judge Jeremy Richardson KC, told the court during his sentencing. His death in jail will now be investigated by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman.
A prison service spokesman said: “HMP Moorland prisoner Peter Lynch died on Oct 19 2024. As with all deaths in custody, the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman will investigate.”
Family Man
“Family man” Lynch, who recently had a heart attack, had gone to protest at the hotel against immigration, his defence barrister told the hearing in August.
He had “a general conspiracy theory against anyone and any form of authority”, and his placard referenced the “deep state” and space agency Nasa. Video played to the court showed Lynch “revving up” the situation before it turned violent, the Recorder said.
He was filmed calling the police “scum”. His sign and protest was not unlawful, but his verbal abuse towards police officers during the “racist incident” crossed the line, the Recorder added.
Lynch, of Burman Road, Wath-upon-Dearne, was a “full participant” in the disorder, the court was told. “You were unquestionably endeavouring to rev up the situation the best you could,” the Recorder added.
Lynch’s placard stated that police chiefs, reporters, civil servants, judges and the Environment Agency were all “corrupt”.
More than 1,511 arrests
Police have made more than 1,511 arrests linked to the summer riots and, together with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), have brought around 1,000 charges.
The arrests came amid a prison overcrowding crisis, with the jails in England and Wales almost running out of space on the weekend of the August bank holiday after the riots.
Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, has since introduced an early release scheme in which prisoners – including many of those convicted for rioting – are eligible to be freed 40 per cent of the way through their sentences rather than halfway.
Terrorist, sexual and specific domestic abuse offences are excluded from the scheme – as are those sentenced to more than four years in jail for violence.
Lynch would have been eligible, having been sentenced to under four years in jail for a violent offence.
Ian Acheson, a former prison governor and government adviser, said: “Any death in custody is a tragedy. Not all can be prevented.
“However, the profile of this offender, rightly jailed for his role in rioting, suggests to me he ought to have at least been considered as a suicide risk.
“The investigation which must take place after a fatal incident in a prison will need to explore this in relation to his vulnerability and care.”
Actually it should be easy to see that because you should actually see the neighborhood leave immediately. You should see a situation where white homeowners drop like a rock, and then blacks buy up the property.
Instead what you see is white homeowners not really responding at all, until a tipping point happens. The initially population of blacks that move into the community are referred to as "pioneers", and basically no one has issues with them. Somewhere around the point where blacks are now 30% or more of the home owners and the neighborhood starts to culturally shift from a white community to a black community. Then there becomes ethnic conflict between the two groups on a cultural basis. When interviewed about this, black residents who were pioneers recalled that they wanted to move into a white community, and at a certain point after them, black migrants wanted to move into a black community. There becomes a point where the standards and expectations of the white community, that the pioneers were exposed to, drops off and it becomes like the standards of the black community the pioneers left. Those drop off in standards is actually where we see a decrease in property values, due to lack of maintenance and cleanliness. Then what follows that is crime (because crime is attracted to disorderliness). That is when you actually see white flight take place, because whites are actually using their home value to build asset wealth. At that point, they have to move to preserve the wealth they've accrued in their home, or they will screw over their family and retirement.
However, once they do that, it's a positive feedback loop of collapsing housing prices, and that is when you see lots of whites move out all at once as home prices fall.
The vast and sweeping majority of the time "white flight" in the way that it is portrayed by the Left almost never happens. Whites don't just see a black person and everyone runs for the hills. Instead what happens is whites respond to collapsing property values and get out while they still can. That or the whites are simply demographically replace (which is more common along the border).
So were those Goldwater Republicans, or... maybe they were strong trade unionist conservatives? And how long after "the mass influx of black immigrants from the south" did whites leave? It's wasn't 1962. That influx started arriving, again, in the 20's.
Detroit did not got leftist until after the white flight occurred
The AFL and UAW prove that to be completely and utterly false. Detroit was a Democratic City in the 1870's, and then during the Progressive Era became a Progressive Republican city. Then during the 30's it went back to being a Progressive Democratic city, where it sits to this very day.
Southern black migration into Detroit would have caused white flight and skyrocketing crime rates in the 20's, when Detroit wasn't anywhere near it's peak, nor most violent.
Your narrative just doesn't mesh with what happened.
As someone who supports Austrian Economics, I understand the argument that even instituting a counter-tarrif is actually worse for both countries, and both markets.
But there's a huge implication that's left out.
It's worse IF AND ONLY IF you already have a free market. The Austrian School refusal to fire back with a tariff makes sense when your economy is so free that it immediately takes over from the lost business. In the end, the people who applied the tariff on you end up being actually worse off, and damaging their own industries in the long run because they are no longer competitive to the market that you now dominate.
Problem is, we don't fucking have that. Trump would have to completely de-regulate huge swathes of industries and close multiple agencies, just to build the economy strong enough, over years, to make the tariffs a bad idea for our opponents.
If you want to do something quick, yeah, you need a reactionary tariff. Then when you drive them back to the negotiation table, you lift the tariffs once you've got a real trade negotiation worked out.
What you don't do is what we currently do: Let one and only one side have tariffs for infinity years for the exclusive benefit of the other country, while we regulate our own companies severely to keep our productivity down and costs up.
Even if you had some kind of problem with race mixing, like you said, it's a non issue.
Yes, countries can be multi-ethnic and just have no issue so long as assimilation occurs, which it inevitably, slowly, does.
Concerns over German immigration were overblown, same with Japanese migration. No one sane is really worried about Germans or Japanese "EATING DA DAWGS. THEY'RE EATING THE PETZ".
Frankly, even the Post Bellum Jim Crow South didn't really care all that much about race mixing with Japanese or Germans. IIRC there was once a Mississippi state court which declared a Japanese family to be culturally white due to their integration and assimilation into the local community.
Even a segregated society can still function so long as amicability still exists. The Amish are effectively living in fully parallel societies, yet there is no one talking about "the American blood is poisoned by the Amish".
He certainly has flaws, but normally when they hit that close to home its one like "believes the minor can consent" or "is a fucking furry."
Can't compromise on the former, but honestly, I'm prepared to compromise on the latter.
I'll take the based furry if he can actually fight the globalist establishment.
White flight occurred because of declining property values, and Chicago was already exceptionally violent, most people in Detroit weren't worried about black neighbors. You're argument would make more sense in Allentown.
Not that any of that matters, My argument still stands that Detroit would be a shithole filled with whites if white flight didn't occur. You can't make a Leftist power center not a shithole.
Her silence is deafening, and this is only a minor CRT example. It's not even egregious. There's worse Washington Post articles.
The whole podcast was them basically educating her on just how bad the book stuff has gotten with progressives. Mix this with her explaining that the whole "crystal lady" thing was entirely manufactured by the media to slander her.
That's the first thing I assumed.