I'm a PC gamer.. so, nothing.

Commies do kill commies, after they've killed many non-commies.

If you like Comedy (Fantasy & Isekai) I can recommend these:

Shinchou Yuusha: Kono Yuusha ga Ore TUEEE Kuse ni Shinchou Sugiru

Otomege Sekai wa Mob ni Kibishii Sekai desu

Kage no Jitsuryokusha ni Naritakute!

Fantasy Bishoujo Juniku Oji-san to

Peter Grill to Kenja no Jikan

Upcoming are;

Jidou Hanbaiki ni Umarekawatta Ore wa Meikyuu wo Samayou

Chiyu Mahou no Machigatta Tsukaikata

Sokushi Cheat ga Saikyou Sugite, Isekai no Yatsura ga Marude Aite ni Naranai n desu ga.

Buta no Liver wa Kanetsu Shiro

Anime.

There's no exact definition, as "å" is used to mean anything from a small ditch with running water to something just slightly smaller than a river, which we call "flod". In fact, we don't usually use "bäck" anymore at all, nor "Älv" (which is what the last watercourse word initially was). Both of these latter ones being specifically used up north in the country, and in older Swedish.

I paraphrased ("Många bäckar små blir till en stor å") to make the meaning come across better, but a direct word for word translation would be "Many brooks small become a great [untranslatable word]". Where untranslatable is a watercourse, bigger than a brook but smaller than a river.

Romanizing, as in making it be able to be said in Swedish, by an English speaker? Then it would be "Mhongah beckhar smoh blihr till ehn stohr oh".

Oh yeah! I'm a 110% sure!!

My country has a saying: "Many small rivers make a great flood".

Words don't mean anything anymore, except for what those in control want it to mean, which means despair and confusion is total, and so is their control.

Since this isn't going anywhere, and you keep showing you don't know what the hell you're talking about (and I keep proving you wrong, yet you still repeat the same FUD), this "conversation" is over.

Just one last thing, having a unique identifier isn't wrong, IF IT IS A DIFFERENT UNIQUE EVERYTIME. You still can't seem to fathom the difference between Uniform fingerprint and Randomized fingerprint. Yet even Brave boasts about some randomization (https://brave.com/privacy-updates/3-fingerprint-randomization/).

This doesn't exactly look like what you want, but it does an okay job anyway: https://archive.ph/h5KIb

Maybe it was this one though: https://archive.ph/hsZEp

Are you perhaps forgetting what I said here: https://communities.win/p/16b5un7XTE/x/c/4TsbFCc9qpq ? and of course there are more switches you can turn off or on in About:Config. It's your browser your way. It's literally the tagline. Unlike lying browser who claim to be about privacy though is anything but. Especially when they try to foist fingerprint uniformity/anonymity and out-of-the-box "solutions".

Also yes, of course I'm using privacy addons. Only a fool doesn't. Out-of-the-box is a trap for the lazy. It doesn't teach you what's what, nor how to protect yourself, Like you've just shown. You also missed how I said that the addon order is randomized, meaning that my addons do not identify me..

You show that you don't really know what you're talking about sadly. coveryourtracks doesn't work on Pale Moon (Bad Request Request Line is too large (8192 > 4094), which is why I left that one out in my post here about fingerprint tests..

and Pale Moon do randomize/poison the canvas data (https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=3357&p=19126&sid=a96d404e4e2fc7c7d66c4a6adf13ea32#p19126):

"canvas.poisondata (true/false, v25.6+): Controls whether to mitigate browser fingerprinting through canvas rendering specifics. This preference, when true, will poison data read from canvas areas with humanly-imperceptible variations in color and lightness. Defaults to false; accurate reading of data is generally preferred, and poisoning severely impacts performance of reading data from canvas." -from 2013

They also randomize the addon order, and other things.

Screen-size spoofing and such can easily be circumvented, since most code "resisting" such fingerprints don't do enough (https://archive.is/kN0D5).

I do agree about compartmentalization, but one should use the best privacy and customizable browser as a main one, and use LibreWolf for the few sites that insists on implementing the latest google experimental "standards", and those "standards" only. Brave is the least worst google chromium browser, but it's still a google chromium browser..

I don't use twitch myself, but I've heard they're a nuisance. I do occasionally use youtube (the one google exception), and their ads are almost as notorious (but greater usage means more amount of people trying to get rid of their ads). I use eMatrix and uBlock Origin and never see ads anywhere.

Indeed! https://www.androidheadlines.com/2020/08/mozilla-firefox-google-search

They also ask for donations, but knowingly confuses people where the money actually goes to. Mozilla Corporation isn't the same as Mozilla Foundation. No money donated goes to the browser, only their political activism.

And then it sends that, and all sites you've visited, and all your information to the CCP.

https://www.kuketz-blog.de/opera-datensendeverhalten-desktop-version-browser-check-teil13/

You've got it backwards. Almost all google chromium and firefox browsers will implement MV3. Some might try to keep WebRequest from MV2, but they'll still follow google Web Extensions, and will have to either Hard Fork or do massive jumps through hoops to re-engineer it when google removes all support for MV2.

https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/20/mozilla_opens_testing_for_manifest/

https://www.ghacks.net/2022/09/24/vivaldi-ad-blocker-manifest-v3/

https://www.ghacks.net/2022/09/29/brave-browser-manifest-v2-extensions-after-v3-update/

https://forums.opera.com/topic/50569/manifest-v3-opera/2?_=1682676951014&lang=en-US

https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/tag/manifest-v3/

Opera is a google chromium, closed source, Chinese-owned spyware..

DNS blockers will become irrelevent when ads are served as first-parties on sites, which goes hand-in-hand with googles MV3 and Shadow/DOM push. As well as PWA's. Just a PSA ;)

Pale Moon can be setup and configured so you don't give out any identifying information. Unlike Brave. Pale Moon also does fingerprint randomizations, instead of fingerprint uniformity, but PM does it with so much more stuff than Brave.

The more chromium forks there are, the greater hold google has on the internet, and fingerprint uniformity only works by restricting usage of the browser. No customizations, no addons, no nothing. It's the wrong way to tackle anti-fingerprinting.

I'd say Brave browser is.. ok-ish. No major scandal. It's the best google chromium browser, but it's still a google chromium browser.

Translate with your choice: https://www.kuketz-blog.de/brave-datensendeverhalten-desktop-version-browser-check-teil1/

That, I'm not sure about. You might find something to jog your memory here: https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Deviations-from-Chromium-(features-we-disable-or-remove)

Brave is a google chromium soft fork, yeah. Which means they recieve google updates from upstream, and have to remove as much as they can, in the rapid release cycle that google uses to copy Microsoft with Internet Explorer's Embrace, Extend, Extinguish tactic to have sites always use the latest experimental standards and therefor google chrom/ium (which gets updates first), and then chromium soft forks..and then firefoxium after that..

Yup. System1 of google frontend Startpage,also dogpile, as well as the bad Startmail, etc.

Here's some fingerprinting tests to try it out with;

https://www.deviceinfo.me/

https://noscriptfingerprint.com/

https://abrahamjuliot.github.io/creepjs/

https://browserleaks.com/

https://browseraudit.com/

https://amiunique.org/

https://fingerprint.pet-portal.eu/?menu=1#