You show that you don't really know what you're talking about sadly. coveryourtracks doesn't work on Pale Moon (Bad Request
Request Line is too large (8192 > 4094), which is why I left that one out in my post here about fingerprint tests..
"canvas.poisondata (true/false, v25.6+): Controls whether to mitigate browser fingerprinting through canvas rendering specifics.
This preference, when true, will poison data read from canvas areas with humanly-imperceptible variations in color and lightness.
Defaults to false; accurate reading of data is generally preferred, and poisoning severely impacts performance of reading data from canvas." -from 2013
They also randomize the addon order, and other things.
Screen-size spoofing and such can easily be circumvented, since most code "resisting" such fingerprints don't do enough (https://archive.is/kN0D5).
I do agree about compartmentalization, but one should use the best privacy and customizable browser as a main one, and use LibreWolf for the few sites that insists on implementing the latest google experimental "standards", and those "standards" only. Brave is the least worst google chromium browser, but it's still a google chromium browser..
That's even more dumb to have a switch for it and turn it off by default. Is there another switch to turn off audio fingerprinting and other fingerprints? /facepalm
I don't see any "bad request" error either on the site or in the dev tools. Maybe you have some extension or setting that's causing that, which of course is a signal to differentiate you from default pale moons.
Are you perhaps forgetting what I said here: https://communities.win/p/16b5un7XTE/x/c/4TsbFCc9qpq ? and of course there are more switches you can turn off or on in About:Config. It's your browser your way. It's literally the tagline. Unlike lying browser who claim to be about privacy though is anything but. Especially when they try to foist fingerprint uniformity/anonymity and out-of-the-box "solutions".
Also yes, of course I'm using privacy addons. Only a fool doesn't. Out-of-the-box is a trap for the lazy. It doesn't teach you what's what, nor how to protect yourself, Like you've just shown. You also missed how I said that the addon order is randomized, meaning that my addons do not identify me..
You also missed how I said that the addon order is randomized, meaning that my addons do not identify me..
I didn't comment on it because it's clownish to think fingerprinters won't just call .sort().
You didn't realize the best overall fingerprint site worked for everybody else using Pale Moon. You thought you could not giving out identifying information, when just the fact of using Pale Moon itself is one of the biggest signals and your signature is so unique it broke the site. Your comments are dripping with invective against a browser that does more for nearly everybody to protect privacy than almost all others.
Try taking your partisan blinders off and chill out for a bit. All that work you've done and it seems you're more identifiable than a default Brave user.
Since this isn't going anywhere, and you keep showing you don't know what the hell you're talking about (and I keep proving you wrong, yet you still repeat the same FUD), this "conversation" is over.
Just one last thing, having a unique identifier isn't wrong, IF IT IS A DIFFERENT UNIQUE EVERYTIME. You still can't seem to fathom the difference between Uniform fingerprint and Randomized fingerprint. Yet even Brave boasts about some randomization (https://brave.com/privacy-updates/3-fingerprint-randomization/).
You show that you don't really know what you're talking about sadly. coveryourtracks doesn't work on Pale Moon (Bad Request Request Line is too large (8192 > 4094), which is why I left that one out in my post here about fingerprint tests..
and Pale Moon do randomize/poison the canvas data (https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=3357&p=19126&sid=a96d404e4e2fc7c7d66c4a6adf13ea32#p19126):
"canvas.poisondata (true/false, v25.6+): Controls whether to mitigate browser fingerprinting through canvas rendering specifics. This preference, when true, will poison data read from canvas areas with humanly-imperceptible variations in color and lightness. Defaults to false; accurate reading of data is generally preferred, and poisoning severely impacts performance of reading data from canvas." -from 2013
They also randomize the addon order, and other things.
Screen-size spoofing and such can easily be circumvented, since most code "resisting" such fingerprints don't do enough (https://archive.is/kN0D5).
I do agree about compartmentalization, but one should use the best privacy and customizable browser as a main one, and use LibreWolf for the few sites that insists on implementing the latest google experimental "standards", and those "standards" only. Brave is the least worst google chromium browser, but it's still a google chromium browser..
about:config: canvas.poisondata default boolean false
That's even more dumb to have a switch for it and turn it off by default. Is there another switch to turn off audio fingerprinting and other fingerprints? /facepalm
I don't see any "bad request" error either on the site or in the dev tools. Maybe you have some extension or setting that's causing that, which of course is a signal to differentiate you from default pale moons.
Are you perhaps forgetting what I said here: https://communities.win/p/16b5un7XTE/x/c/4TsbFCc9qpq ? and of course there are more switches you can turn off or on in About:Config. It's your browser your way. It's literally the tagline. Unlike lying browser who claim to be about privacy though is anything but. Especially when they try to foist fingerprint uniformity/anonymity and out-of-the-box "solutions".
Also yes, of course I'm using privacy addons. Only a fool doesn't. Out-of-the-box is a trap for the lazy. It doesn't teach you what's what, nor how to protect yourself, Like you've just shown. You also missed how I said that the addon order is randomized, meaning that my addons do not identify me..
I didn't comment on it because it's clownish to think fingerprinters won't just call .sort().
You didn't realize the best overall fingerprint site worked for everybody else using Pale Moon. You thought you could not giving out identifying information, when just the fact of using Pale Moon itself is one of the biggest signals and your signature is so unique it broke the site. Your comments are dripping with invective against a browser that does more for nearly everybody to protect privacy than almost all others.
Try taking your partisan blinders off and chill out for a bit. All that work you've done and it seems you're more identifiable than a default Brave user.
Since this isn't going anywhere, and you keep showing you don't know what the hell you're talking about (and I keep proving you wrong, yet you still repeat the same FUD), this "conversation" is over.
Just one last thing, having a unique identifier isn't wrong, IF IT IS A DIFFERENT UNIQUE EVERYTIME. You still can't seem to fathom the difference between Uniform fingerprint and Randomized fingerprint. Yet even Brave boasts about some randomization (https://brave.com/privacy-updates/3-fingerprint-randomization/).