You also missed how I said that the addon order is randomized, meaning that my addons do not identify me..
I didn't comment on it because it's clownish to think fingerprinters won't just call .sort().
You didn't realize the best overall fingerprint site worked for everybody else using Pale Moon. You thought you could not giving out identifying information, when just the fact of using Pale Moon itself is one of the biggest signals and your signature is so unique it broke the site. Your comments are dripping with invective against a browser that does more for nearly everybody to protect privacy than almost all others.
Try taking your partisan blinders off and chill out for a bit. All that work you've done and it seems you're more identifiable than a default Brave user.
Since this isn't going anywhere, and you keep showing you don't know what the hell you're talking about (and I keep proving you wrong, yet you still repeat the same FUD), this "conversation" is over.
Just one last thing, having a unique identifier isn't wrong, IF IT IS A DIFFERENT UNIQUE EVERYTIME. You still can't seem to fathom the difference between Uniform fingerprint and Randomized fingerprint. Yet even Brave boasts about some randomization (https://brave.com/privacy-updates/3-fingerprint-randomization/).
Ha ha. Dude your browser narced on you so bad it broke the test.
Just one last thing, having a unique identifier isn't wrong, IF IT IS A DIFFERENT UNIQUE EVERYTIME. You still can't seem to fathom the difference between Uniform fingerprint and Randomized fingerprint.
You can't seem to understand that "a" unique identifier means nothing, what matters is "the" unique identifiers that are actually used. So you believe that your plugin list of 30 plugins in randomized order gives you a different id each time, and it does on an naïve hash and doesn't on a sorted hash.
You're picking some public test that uses an ordered plugin hash and reassuring yourself that your browser is good because it's a different order each time, but your adversaries are using the sorted hash which is the same every time because they're not partisan idiots that need to believe Pale Moon is a good browser.
I didn't comment on it because it's clownish to think fingerprinters won't just call .sort().
You didn't realize the best overall fingerprint site worked for everybody else using Pale Moon. You thought you could not giving out identifying information, when just the fact of using Pale Moon itself is one of the biggest signals and your signature is so unique it broke the site. Your comments are dripping with invective against a browser that does more for nearly everybody to protect privacy than almost all others.
Try taking your partisan blinders off and chill out for a bit. All that work you've done and it seems you're more identifiable than a default Brave user.
Since this isn't going anywhere, and you keep showing you don't know what the hell you're talking about (and I keep proving you wrong, yet you still repeat the same FUD), this "conversation" is over.
Just one last thing, having a unique identifier isn't wrong, IF IT IS A DIFFERENT UNIQUE EVERYTIME. You still can't seem to fathom the difference between Uniform fingerprint and Randomized fingerprint. Yet even Brave boasts about some randomization (https://brave.com/privacy-updates/3-fingerprint-randomization/).
Ha ha. Dude your browser narced on you so bad it broke the test.
You can't seem to understand that "a" unique identifier means nothing, what matters is "the" unique identifiers that are actually used. So you believe that your plugin list of 30 plugins in randomized order gives you a different id each time, and it does on an naïve hash and doesn't on a sorted hash.
You're picking some public test that uses an ordered plugin hash and reassuring yourself that your browser is good because it's a different order each time, but your adversaries are using the sorted hash which is the same every time because they're not partisan idiots that need to believe Pale Moon is a good browser.