-3
DomitiusOfMassilia -3 points ago +2 / -5

"I must defend the Israeli intelligence agencies because the state is the intertemporal embodiment of the race" seems very stormfag-ish to me...

2
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

A communist in Boston was a jew, thus: race war now.

Sure thing.

Also:

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - identity Attacks

Asserting jews are aligned with evil

-3
DomitiusOfMassilia -3 points ago +1 / -4

You don't have any evidence for your assertion of the eternal jewish race war via eyeglasses.

by Lethn
-12
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -12 points ago +1 / -13

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

0
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Again, satire can't be a Rule 16 violation.

It looked like you were trying to touch but not cross Rule 16, and you did it with the same satire that Jester would have used about the Irish.

It's simple: if you want to violate Rule 16, you assert that innate moral inferiority, and you have to actually not do it as satire. You'd have to say something akin to "the amish are an inferior race deserving of discrimination"

I've removed at least 2 comments for anti-christian rule 16 violations. The issue is that there's hardly any anti-christians that post.

-16
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -16 points ago +1 / -17

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - identity attacks

Comment Removed for; Rule 16 - identity attacks

Asserting jewish racial conspiracy to... make eyeglasses ugly... ok

2
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Claiming that jews are aligned with evil

0
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Asserting a jewish cabal controlled the maliciousness of characters.

3
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 3 points ago +8 / -5

Post Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Post Approved: The government of Israel is not an identity group.

-4
DomitiusOfMassilia -4 points ago +7 / -11

You're a fucking idiot if you believe that.

-6
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -6 points ago +5 / -11

Flat Earth doesn't violate literally any rule.

2
DomitiusOfMassilia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, you mean before Hitler replaced the currency with a system in which 1 hour of labor equaled 1 of the currency?

And immediately debased it.

What? I can't find anything about that. Did you just make it up?

Read Gobbels accounts of the war.

3
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

This doesn't actually go to this point, though it is close.

The best bet was to avoid Reddit's jingoism by just not allowing people to cheer for dead on either side.

This doesn't quite hit that yet.

0
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 0 points ago +2 / -2

Post Reported for:

  • Inflicting brain damage on anyone who reads the thread
  • I demand a refund on the time lost reading this stupidity.

Strangely enough, this is close to a Rule 16 violation, but:

a) He's (Jessie Ventura voice) "just asking questions"

b) This appears to be satire.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Removing foreign influences is literally what the German National Socialists did. They removed jewish influences (pro-degeneracy, Marxism, usury) in politics, media, culture, economy and lo and behold, somehow an unprecedented economic boom occurred, the culture recuperated, child prostitutes were no more, rampant homosexuality and transvestism was gone, and Germany became a world power.

I can't quite tell if it's just more ignorance of history or outright lies. The NSDAP did literally none of those things. None of those things are jewish influences, first and foremost. Followed by the fact that culture hadn't changed, homosexuality was present within the NSDAP itself, and usury as a concept really doesn't apply here because most people already weren't allowed to get loans under the Nazis, and only the largest organizations sponsoring re-armamentation got loans anyways, and those were subsidized by money printing.

The economic recovery of Germany occurred under the Weimar period. The SDP lost the election because after having recovered the German economy from their own policies, they were pledging to re-institute all of the old policies. Nazi revisionism took credit for an economy that had already recovered, and then proceeded to lie about how good the economy was after it had already made it, while the economy immediately turned to shit due to central planning and high-inflation of printed money again. This is because of the National Socialist's Socialist policies. This is why Germany was suffering a famine in 1941 while it was winning the war.

Of course they are

No they wouldn't. That's what Gleichshaltung is about. Foreginers can't exist in Fascist or National Socialist states. Most of the time in Fascist states, they would be assimilated.

Who the fuck cares about muh' Gleichschaltung even?

It's your policy.

I don't know how the hell you crafted your theories up, but it doesn't seem to have much connection to reality.

They're not mine, Hitler wrote them down. This is one of the reasons you can't lie about it. Your position is his position.

And by the way,

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Asserting "jewish" influences solely defined by Marxism, degeneracy, and usruy.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's so weird how dangerously close that is to that "Common sense" ideology. Unless of course you consider "Nature" to contradict common sense

Then let's get back to you admitting your bullshit.

This is not about you crying about 'common sense' and 'pointing out patterns'. This is me calling you out about Judeo-Capitalism, and you pretending to be stupid.

National Socialists: They believe foreign interference causes harm to a nation, and that only natives of that country should be in charge of the country.

Nope, this is an explicit lie. National Socialism is not nativistic, and it's not anti-foreign. It is about the gleichschaltung of a race into a Volksgemeinschaft administered by the state. "Foreigners" are not really a concept because it would not be within the state anyway. A state's boundaries become the boundaries of the 'blood'. It's not about removing foreign interference from a state, it's about abolishing that state and making a new one.

Nativism is totally irrelevant. The nation doesn't have to be of a region for the state to occupy it.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oligarchies are not inherently immoral nor amoral

So you think discriminating against all races except your own, and discriminating against Whites only is practically the same?

No, you're intentionally assuming things.

Preferring your own species, race and tribe is natural for humanity for its entire existence minus the past century for Whites, and natural for ALL other humans and animals.

No, you're intentionally conflating preference and "I will exclusively hire people of my race". That is ideological.

So what "ideology" are you talking about?

National Socialism.

Leftists of the past were "racist" by your definition, and it's quite plausible to assume they had interactions with the NSDAP, as they likely shared agendas.

Yes, because National Socialists are Leftists. Most of their agenda is the same.

After WWII, things started to change.

Yes, Leftism seeks to alter topical issues to push for Socialist revolution. Same reason why the Left is both for and against the working class today. They are against the anti-Left working class, while claiming that the pro-Left working class are the "real" working class.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weird how it always happens though.

No, hierarchies in society form naturally regardless of race or ethnic group. Again, this is purely Leftist thinking. The Bourgeoise cabal is the cause of all hierarchy from the Capitalist system they invented in order to control society which would be inherently equal in outcome in all other cases. You're thinking that evidence of one jew in a hierarchy means evidence of a jewish racially controlled hierarchy.

Oh, I thought I'd be a "white supremacist" then?

There isn't a difference.

Anybody can be a DEI hire, and the point is to seek racial and gender quotas, prioritizing that over competence and the well-being of the business. If you hire your own race, it's just natural behavior.

Yeah, those are the same thing, and it's not 'natural' behavior. It's ideological behavior.

Weird, let me reiterate some agendas

Allow me to counter with all Progressive Racialist narratives prior to 1940. You're cryiing about anti-white policies conducted by political parties that espoused "White Supremacy" in previous decades, and in some cases, you have Leftist political parties that were either founded by, or affiliated with, members of the NSDAP, who are championing the anti-white rhetoric they have now.

Leftism, never, has to be anti-white.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only reason I was playing it was because there were millions of people watching it on X, and millions of people who couldn't get into the Space!

Yeah, that's exactly why they removed it.

Fix this.

You don't seem to understand that this is working exactly as intended.

2
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Post Reported for: Rule 13 - Reposts (x2)

Post Approved: Yes, I know, but this has 114 upvotes, indicating it was significantly interesting to the general population to engage with this content specifically.

-1
DomitiusOfMassilia -1 points ago +1 / -2

What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.

Adolf Hitler.

Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy?

No, I mean Judeo-Capitalism, see above.

That's a natural outcome of their rule

Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.

I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.

No, you'd be a DEI officer.

All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White.

Leftism is not inherently anti-white. It shifts it's position to what is most tactically beneficial. It used to be heavily pro-white. Leftism was invented by whites.

-1
DomitiusOfMassilia -1 points ago +1 / -2

I don't think you understand that I've behaved objectively.

Also, speaking of emotional investment, you can tell the ConPro users who screen-shotted our chat that it is wholly inappropriate for me to go over to their forum and bicker with their users. I'm not going to even allow for the appearance of a flame war, forum war, or brigade.

One of the primary benefits of going over there is that they don't have to engage with me at all.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›