I thought maybe they'd be a thorn in our side briefly, but it's obvious they're going to be a bother the entirety of Trump's second term.

Because some of you faggots never shut up about jews

that showed up on Jan 6 at his request

He told them to go home in his speech that day and tried working with the DC Mayor to up security to avoid conflict, you retard.

You're just upset that you didn't get your little acceleration to Civil War and simply behaving as a worse caricature of the "centrist" fence-sitters that claim both sides are bad. So stay mad.

I'm well aware of the bigger picture going on here, but I'm not going to let it affect my sanity.

Many of us were already aware of his connections. We just don't make galaxy-brain moves on a chessboard

Oh boy, so not only are we going to be dealing with Marxists screeching and rioting, but also groypers complaining too?

It's never enough with you pukes.

No, MLGS usually tells retards to shut up on occasion, not always helpful but some deserve it. And since Kopkot is one of those pussies that purges accounts routinely (given the way he talks, it makes sense) and complaining about our victory, he does deserve it.

whenever someone threatens the standing of zion don here... tell me, is it because it's S.O.P., or is it because your salaries are too low to come up with anything better?

AnYoNe WhO cOmPlAiNs AbOuT jEwPoStInG iS a FiLtHy JeW oR jDf StOoGe

Give it a fucking rest.

Their huffing about tariffs is moot since the recent push from Congress to go after Temu/AliExpress for "exploiting American customers".

EDIT: I'll put a proper response

The core of where the complaint is coming from, that the prices will certainly increase, is somewhat a legit concern. Because many non-perishable products bought in the US come from off-shore, the economy could hurt briefly to force some companies to bring parts production back onshore. It also would probably mean a soft reset, realigning some prices with the true price, while also forcing companies to have to forgo "disposable" products that should be durable.

For the tax cuts, this would soften the temporary blow to the economy that tariffs could bring and zero out the cost that Americans would have to cover. Then the main issue would be the purchasing power of the dollar as it can't be too low. Also, there are some classes of "essential" items (household appliances for one) that are completely offshore at this point and would probably take months to get all of it back to domestic, as moving and setting up manufacturing doesn't happen in a week. People might wind up paying American prices for Chinese-made junk in some areas. The long-term benefits do outweigh the short-term, but citizens might be unhappy during the transition

The bigger question to me is does this raise the cost of importing something that would obviously never be available in the US (e.g. merchandise from Japan, European cheese, etc.)? Caution should to be given as to what to put tariffs on. If it's Chinese junk, fine, I think people will manage assuming that there aren't many "essential" purchases that have been off-shored. If it's all imports, that's a different story.

Another hit from the slowly-growing "Now That's What I Call Coping: 2016 Redux" collection

Methinks the creature has been summoned to enter within the 495th to perform a pestilent pantomime in front of the mooks.

Some of states ended up so close it's concerning. Either rigging is going on or we're truly in for the long haul the next few presidential cycles.

Groypers are needy basket cases.

Movements sometimes have their break-away batch of extremists that have no concept of political strategy or smart concession-making.

TERFs were going to be pissing themselves regardless. Their misandry knows no bounds.

Trump win meant a return to normal masculinity. Dems win meant half-orcs continuing their invasion of women spaces.

So far I've seen that at least one troon is going to be sent to Congress.

Gunshy about specific states. Once Harris had at least a 2pt lead in VA they immediately called it for her. They held out on PA and GA (where he had 2-3+% leads) until after I went to sleep.

I'm still holding fast on a 5-10% lead win for Trump, as similar to the prediction I made 2 weeks ago (https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/199OKVMvrz/x/c/4ZFBzR5N1sY)

He will win but not by a significant margin.

No shit it should be an actual holiday, allow the wagies to vote and purge their masters.

My understanding was that the bulk of complaints were that blocking someone now means you can still see their tweets. If it means those you block can still see your tweets, then I don't see a problem.

Make a private account

Rendering the whole point of being on Twitter useless. ┐(ツ)┌

I don't know why that stupid feature is repeatedly suggested.

Twitter's version of blocking has always been a problem because it leans towards the idea that you're blocking someone because they're harassing you (mods don't have time to punish everyone, the site is terribly huge) or are offensive to one's tastes (nebulous bullshit). The changes Musk et al are forcing doesn't do much to improve it, and sort of breaks the idea of allowing users to regulate their own interactions with others.

Blocking should be some mix that allows curation but doesn't deny the rights of other users. If I block someone, I should not be seeing the user's posts on my feed, however the user should still be allowed to interact with my posts. But even if they interact, I should not be notified that they responded, nor should I be able to see the responses.

Doing it tomorrow morning.

I sternly believe Election Day should be a federal holiday. Pretty damn obvious why it isn't, as it blows all the excuses the corrupt tyrants have out of the water.

The problem with Harris is that she shot herself in the foot 3 years ago and didn't know it. She can't stop the count. She made it criminal for her to do so. Now, it's possible that she could break the law and do it anyway, creating a constitutional crisis, an impeachment struggle, and a House of Representatives vote. I've argued this may still happen, but it's unlikely if Trump does well.

Okay that clears it up for me.

I don't know if it's been noted yet, but it's my understanding that Harris, being the current VP, is the one who has to certify the election. (Correct me if I'm wrong on this, seems like a Michigan/Arizona scenario again)

So to me it's a matter of going two different ways.

• Harris and co. steal it through mail-in ballots and destroying votes/registration, she certifies her own fraudulent election.

• Trump wins and Harris refuses to certify, basically doing what the Deep State proclaimed protesters wanted Pence to do but didn't.

Be careful, someone might retort with "we couldn't because the military had their hands tied down by humanitarianism".

We're less than a week to election day with some shenanigans in PA already happening. Confirmation bias will snap Hanlon's razor in half.

the ‘glitch.’

This word being used that is almost never used to describe an error in software. "Glitch" implies it was not the fault of the programmer, which is BS because a program does exactly what you tell it to.

the numbers aired were purely “randomly generated test results” with no connection to actual vote counts

Terrible CYA. Either the results weren't randomly generated and whoever made the results had a bias that they baked into the generation, or they had ChatGPT produce the data with some prompt of "produce mock 2024 presidential election results for Pennsylvania similar to the 2020 election" and fed it that. There was clearly no checking of the data before sending out or some asshole went "this is fine", or the one producing the results is also the person sending it out.