What built in mechanics does DnD have that track sense of self?
Why do you need a rule book to tell you how to do that? Anyways that is pretty much reflected in your Cha score, when it hits 0 you become a potato without a sense of self. Damage to Wis also does this, and outsiders like Gibbering Mouthers (aka lovecraftian horrors) do this.
What mechanics encourage the use of a completely non-combat capable character?
That depends entirely on the campaign you are playing. You can do the same sort of emo intrigue wankery that is the ONLY thing you can do in VtM just as easily in DnD. You just have to have a group willing to do that. After all, most of the spells in the 3.5 handbook are non-combat spells. Zone of Truth does nothing in combat, Sending does nothing in combat, Stone to Mud does very little in combat. For that matter most of the skills in DnD are non combat.
It's not worse at it. That is the fallacy in action. And having fewer tables just means the DM has to spend more time coming up with that stuff himself. Those tables are there to let a DM create encounters and situations on the fly faster. The roleplaying is entirely dependent on the players, not the system. If a DM is calling for rolls when the players are role playing then he is just a bad DM, which is unfortunately the standard and not the exception.
Your mistake is that you think most people are any different from an LLM. In the majority of the world, learning is just fact regurgitation. For a good explanation of that just look at the chapter discussing Brazil in "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!" It is pretty much only the White Anglosphere (and at least at one point, Germany) that focus on anything else.
Yeah, it's very much fuzzy Bayesian logic.
Who says humans do to that? You put a LLM and an Indian behind a monitor and try to tell them apart.
This is the Stormwind Fallacy in action. The system does not change how much roleplaying one does. It is the players that do that. You can infact run a HighOp DnD campaign and have the best roleplaying at the same time. (In fact running a campaign with High System Mastery players is better because there is less rules lawyering, munchkining, and just slow play that blocks the story.)
Razorfarce showed himself to be a fucking retard back in 2016 when he ran apologia for "voting irregularities" in Maricopa County.
That matter was already inside the universe. It didn't come from nothing, it was just compressed past the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff limit. no one, not even you, knows what happened before that.
Bullshit. The universe is by definition a closed system. Any theory that says otherwise is wrong. Nothing enters or leaves the universe.
Why would I refute him? You have no understanding of what he says. You always post links and videos and never put explanations into your own words. Anyways, the Komar mass is conserved.
You're always so confidently ignorant.
Pure projection.
It doesn't take energy to maintain an expansion into nothingness.
energy isn’t conserved as the 1st “law”
You couldn't be more wrong.
If you have an energy per volume and then increase that volume then your energy per volume should go down.
Why the fuck are you making me defend Gizortnik?
Like hell, I'm going to watch that garbage. Go suck a turd, you faggot crying about downvotes.
And the primary mode of transportation in the far east is flying swords. And we are ruled by a secret cabal of millennia old Tibetan monks nascent soul cultivators. And Hiroshima was really Goku doing a Kamehameha.
Get out you fucking flat earther. You don't belong. Not here. Not in the US. Not in this universe.
All you post are kookification post to ensure that new eyes getting to this board from all associate us with this garbage. You are worse than the christcucks, and the civnats.
I wouldn't mock christcucks so much if they didn't try to import every single brown person that made sad eyes at them.
With 4 parameters you can fit an elephant, with 5 you can make it wiggle it's trunk. With 5 billion you can make anything say anything.
If they move south they eat the poonadians, so no loss. It would probably make the bears sick though.
That means he supports it but doesn't want to say so. If he didn't support it he would have already ran his mouth saying so.
There is not a talent pool deficit. That is a Big Lie.
What a strange world you live in, where -1 = 1.
Like I said, you can't claim that a white baby that literally doesn't understand where you go when you leave the room is of higher intelligence than Thomas Sowell.
This sentence right here shows that you have no clue what IQ is. What is the point of a measurement that just duplicates the SAT? The whole idea of IQ is to predict how smart someone will be by a test administered as young as possible. It exists to correctly allocate educational resources, instead of wasting money trying to teach niggers.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289606000791
This is the only way.