-2
Arkana -2 points ago +2 / -4

I wonder if they will keep the anti-japanese sentiment as well. The villains of Yakuza 7 are people who want to keep Japan ethnically Japanese.

3
Arkana 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's to fight the "inequality" of systemic oppression, according to their logic. Which is why white men will always be payed less compared to minorities and women for the same work.

3
Arkana 3 points ago +3 / -0

When it comes to living beings, everything must be looked at from the perspective of genetics first and foremost. Without genetics life would not exist. Everything a living being does has a genetic and biological foundation.

No matter what you do, you will be considered racist and evil for standing against equality. Trump was vilified for trying to reform the system. Republicans or conservatives will be vilified for not bending over backwards hard enough as well.

People must stand up for their inner nature. They must take pride in who they are, or else they will never be able to accomplish anything of lasting value.

34
Arkana 34 points ago +35 / -1

"It's okay if our societies get destroyed as long as it's done LEGALLY" - Conservatives

Either they foolishly believe that the legal system is actually still looking out for their interest, or they know exactly what's going on and are just putting up a fake resistance to it while they get their payday.

15
Arkana 15 points ago +15 / -0

Right now they're a leftist politics blog that attacks the games industry.

23
Arkana 23 points ago +23 / -0

Kotaku was a gaming blog that posted stuff like news about games, anime, cosplays, etc. It started out as a generally decent site, but over time it started to hate gamers and people who like games.

KotakuInAction was made on reddit to document how awful Kotaku has been. GamerGate happened which was focused on the ethical violations they and other gaming outlets made.

Over time we realized that what caused Kotaku and games journalism to become awful extended far beyond gaming news, it was in universities, mainstream press, and everywhere else. The split between the original KotakuInAction and KIA2 was because the mods wanted to limit what people could post about, and overturned a vote on it.

Due to reddit censorship most of the people from there now post on here, on a variety of political topics but still with a focus on games, entertainment, and journalism.

2
Arkana 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, because to them "racism" is anything that creates racial inequality. Or at least that's the logic they are using to pull people in. Discriminating against whites is supposed to lower racial inequality, and it's supported by them.

Of course there is no end when "equality" is actually reached. Which means whites will never stop being attacked, until they properly defend themselves racially.

4
Arkana 4 points ago +4 / -0

The end goal is the extermination of their enemies. Equality is something that will be used as a wedge for as long as it's useful, as is every attack word and phrase they are using.

9
Arkana 9 points ago +9 / -0

We all know that when the left and right talk about things like "equality" they are not talking about the same concept. This leads to differing definitions of "oppression" "racism" and many other concepts as well.

These are used as attack words, made to accomplish specific goals. Initially to attack the aristocracy and dispose them, so an easier revolution can take place. Now the revolutions have all came and went, so the target needs to shift from the "elites" to the citizens who stand against their rule.

4
Arkana 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because their sense of "progress" is anything that goes against natural hierarchy.

49
Arkana 49 points ago +49 / -0

They don't care if people didn't enjoy it, it's about propaganda. That's why it won game of the year too, of course curated by "industry veterans" and journalists. It's about generating a false consensus.

The purpose is to control and ultimately lobotomize the industry, because white men enjoy it. This thread touches on that a bit.

11
Arkana 11 points ago +11 / -0

"The state" is the way that power is dispensed towards the people. Without it you have anarchy. The people in power will support their kin, that can either be done explicitly or not. This could just be people they are ideologically aligned with, or genetically aligned with, but usually both to a large degree.

Trying to support an individualist society with a small government is the same as disarmament. It divides your society into weaker and uncoordinated groups, just because you get rid of your weapons does not mean that others will do the same.

As for christianity I would suggest watching this video by Vertigo Politix.

5
Arkana 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't expect them to do anything, like I said I do not believe they will do any real resistance to the people in power. If any news organization had legitimate cause they would be supporting white people explicitly. Any organization that is not chiefly pro-white will be supporting anti-white causes.

7
Arkana 7 points ago +11 / -4

I firmly believe that Rebel News is controlled opposition, in a similar vein as Fox News. They are meant to play the bad guy for the establishment and draw support from dissidents, but overall they will do nothing that actually threatens or harms the regime. They might have individual editors or people who have done good work, but I have zero faith in the management.

12
Arkana 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yeah, for now. I imagine there are progressives on their team who want to censor more though, and this is the first step towards doing that.

24
Arkana 24 points ago +26 / -2

He's not being "racist" he's being anti-white. As evidenced by all the other things he's made, he doesn't like white men.

7
Arkana 7 points ago +7 / -0

This Vertigo Politix video is a bit old but it goes over it well.

The left/progressives can only either "joke" about their ideology which basically acts as an infodump about how they are right and everybody else is wrong, or they need to be approved to laugh at a joke otherwise they may be attacked for enjoying something offensive or problematic.

This means their memes are either unfunny and target that extreme idological niche, or unfunny and extremely watered down to the point that they are nothing new. No experimentation allowed, no pushing of boundaries, because that would end up as wrongthink. Stay in your area and laugh at the acceptable material comrade.

12
Arkana 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's because context can be more powerful than content. It doesn't matter what the truth is exactly, if you can bend and spin something to make your narrative stronger then you can more easily influence other people. This is the "big lie" in action.

In fact if you stand against the truth, because admitting the truth would damage your narrative. The most effective thing is to take an exactly opposite stance to it. This is because most people trust things based on consensus. So if everybody is saying the same thing, it becomes easier to say it yourself.

The anti-white, anti-male, and anti-christian narratives make it so they can never admit those groups helped create Western society as we know it today. They must be blamed for everything, even things that they were trying to prevent.

24
Arkana 24 points ago +26 / -2

Goldberg

22
Arkana 22 points ago +22 / -0

Yeah it's a pretty weak virtue signal. If they really wanted some attention they should have let her come, and then bombarded her with questions about trans. Create a public struggle session, but of course that requires some level of balls to actually pull off.

13
Arkana 13 points ago +13 / -0

I assume this is the case. And China certainly isn't going to start importing Africans to bring up their population numbers.

17
Arkana 17 points ago +17 / -0

Ironically this image which is supposed to deride white people does a decent summary of Western culture.

Something pro-white is anything good for white people overall. Letting white people have their own spaces, being able to honestly speak their mind and not feel eternal guilt over their race.

19
Arkana 19 points ago +20 / -1

This is something I've been saying for a while now. Framing others as "racist" will never accomplish anything because whites are considered inherently racist and evil. The onlookers will not change their mind in any way because they can just say "You're a bigger racist!" to the white person. No amount of proving how anti-racist you are will work, it will never be enough.

Instead you need to point out when people are being anti-white, and contrast that with things that are pro-white. If you do this then the other person will either make it clear they are anti-white, or avoid the issue with some kind of excuse.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›