resting on the laurels of your ancestors is lazy and entitled. I don't care what someone's great great great grandfather did, I care about what they can do and what they want today.
we are not dogs
yeah, well you're a dumb poopy head
not an argument.
my assertion is that intelligence and competence are not tied to race, and that filtering by race will not succeed in eliminating regressive people. I invite you to counter this assertion instead of just throwing insults.
no individuals are equal, everyone has their strengths and weaknesses. those strengths and weaknesses vary so much that race does not accurately subdivide the population.
glad I'm not the only one. I tried to get into it several times and the pacing just bored me to death.
same for Red Dead Redemption 2
the resolution would likely have ended in the entire Middle East being a giant crater.
there is no peace in the Middle East and there never will be.
the founding fathers wanted to accept all Europeans. english, french, irish, scottish, italian, spanish, whatever. many different races.
the world has expanded, communication has grown, and travel has become easier. people of given races have both advanced and regressed, including whites.
it is best to be intelligent and competent yourself, to surround yourself with intelligent and competent people, and distance yourself from regressive people. these traits are not bound to race.
yet there are no hard lines to competence between races. there are tons of blacks who can read, and there are tons of whites who can't read. drawing the line at race is an incomplete solution.
the line should be drawn at competence, moral character, and willingness to adapt culturally. not race.
not remotely what I said.
leave a bad review and move on. don't engage with the culture war because it helps them with free publicity. the worst fate a piece of media can suffer is irrelevance.
ignore them. maybe even tell your friends to ignore them. but do not engage.
JP is correct when he says that identifying yourself by your race is retarded. it might be different in Europe where race is more tied to geographical borders, but it certainly not the case in North America.
Virgin: help me daddy media/government/ratings authority, these poo poo movies are bad and hurt my fee fees. Ban them daddy!
Chad: it's shit, no buy
Before: fags
After: fags
I stand corrected, thank you
Most Zionists are jewish, not all jews are Zionists.
Zionists are murderous jewish crusaders hellbent on ethnically cleansing the holy land so that they can create their racial supremacist ethnostate.
A jew is simply someone who follows the jewish religion, or has jewish heritage. Soros proved that there is a sizable jewish population that opposes zionism.
they are not the same.
EDIT: most*, not all
anyone got an archive of the original?
"when you stand before god, you cannot say 'but I was told to do thus'"
The jews indeed begged the romans to kill Jesus, but the romans had the authority in the matter and opted to oblige. Therefore, the romans killed Jesus.
is this a thing? like, are there Jewish texts instructing Orthodox Jews to do something like this? because if so, that would explain a lot of Israel's behavior.
technically, according to the Bible they did. they just did so to calm the Jewish riots.
edit: fucking speech to text
and they call me a heretic.
right wing politicians want that, but not the American right. the American right wants law and order, fiscal responsibility, to uphold traditional values, and economic opportunity.
Nazis and neo-nazis want uniform conformity, command and control economy, the erasure of tradition in favor of a new tradition, and the total advancement of the state. Nazis are leftists who are just slightly right of Marx.
posing for the camera is all PF does, because they are feds. they don't advertise any legislation, they don't defend against violent left-wing radicals, they don't advance any political candidates, and the few that they do mention disavow them.
because they are feds.
in today's day and age, everyone is a special snowflake. look at the Charlottesville riots for instance, the only thing consistent about that demonstration was the tiki torches. everyone had their unique clothing, and during the street brawl the next day everyone had their own gear on both sides.
PF have straight up uniforms, as well as seemingly mass-produced paraphernalia. that's a ton of coordination for a supposedly grassroots group. combine this with their complete and utter lack of visibility on any of the regular complete and utter lack of visibility on any of the regular forums and it just screams fed.
for one, antifa are actually dangerous with a body count and arson rap. Patriot Front are just a bunch of pussies posing for the camera.
for two, the left is actually crazy. they genuinely believe anything and everything is permissible so long as they win. the right is more principled, and as such will be more active in weeding out bad apples within their movement.
and for three, I have no doubt there are feds with antifa. the left just doesn't care. the right does care, as we should, because feds are nothing but trouble. if they're not infiltrating to find excuses to create political prisoners, they are actively sabotaging the movement by being comically scary while the cameras are rolling.
Patriot Front are faggots.
my assertion
your rebuttal
my rebuttal to your rebuttal
I understand the confusion as we are both talking about different scopes of time. I should have been clearer in that I'm talking about today's world, not history.