5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

For some unexplained reasons, Gretchen Whitmer seems to have some appeal. Or Josh Shapiro, the Gov of PA.

Any of them should do better than a senile guy who brags about beating Medicare.

Which is why I want Biden to do really well... in the coming 2 months.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +7 / -4

It wouldn't have been as successful as it is if it weren't brilliantly insidious.

You can enter the religion easily but never leave? Brilliant. You can marry infidel women as long as the children are raised into that religion? Brilliant.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

That comment was just about the election. But yeah, no faction has enough power to either fuck France (even further) or unfuck it. Things are not great as it is, so if I weren't optimistic about the near future, I'd view that as very bad news.

-12
AntonioOfVenice -12 points ago +13 / -25

Man, I agree with you on the substance, but I wish you could have kept your spaghetti in your pockets. The fact is, if you bring it like this, you are very likely to just be dismissed as a crazy guy.

Muslims are adherents to a certain ideology. You should be able to call them out, same as conservatives, liberals, communists, progressives, white nationalists, etc. - even though none of these ideologies are as idiotic as Islam.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +4 / -1

My guess: either they're trying to push him out to increase Dem chances of winning, or covering up how they covered up his dementia for 6 years.

-3
AntonioOfVenice -3 points ago +1 / -4

Actually he was saying that he didn't care about the laptop being covered up, which changes everything.

Correct, he was lying (or extremely ill-informed) and pretending that the laptop was just about Hunter's troubled personal life and not the corruption of, the gods protect him, Joe Biden.

This isn't a hypothetical world where Biden's presidency hinges on Harris' vote and where Harris' voting motives have to be boiled down to obnoxiously reductive logic. It's a real world, where he knows that the laptop getting full, free press coverage would have harmed Biden's campaign.

Correct. He even accidentally told the truth and said that it was a left-wing conspiracy until ratonalization kicked in. But isn't it interesting that by the time he addressed this, Biden's presidency did not hinge on Harris rationalizing all the evils done to get there, and he justified it anyway?

In this context he said that had Hunter had dead children in his basement and it had been covered up to protect Biden's campaign, then that still would have been the morally correct thing to do because of the extent of Trump's evil.

While I don't doubt that he would have believed that in the situation, and perhaps even justify it to himself by persuading himself that this has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO with Joe Biden, I think that as it happened, he was just saying that he doesn't care.

25
AntonioOfVenice 25 points ago +26 / -1

I don't even care about this. Anyone with eyes can see that Biden is a dementia patient.

But why has the media covered this up for 8 months, and why does it only dig this up when it suits their campaign to drive Joe out of the race?

-2
AntonioOfVenice -2 points ago +1 / -3

Whether or not you think that, this question is relevant for whether or not the alleged insanity of the Jews is caused by the Talmud. If so, you'd expect the secular/atheist Jews to be the least insane.

-7
AntonioOfVenice -7 points ago +1 / -8

No it was a fairly blatant attempt at some kind of gotcha on your part

Is it?

But given how much outright blasphemy I've seen you spout

You must never have heard of 'the Lamb of God'.

-3
AntonioOfVenice -3 points ago +1 / -4

Well we already know that you're a JIDF shill for Israel

You do?

How did you gain this great wisdom? No doubt by the same route that told you that Newtown was FAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

so wouldn't surprise me if you're a shill for the US government's lies

It "wouldn't surprise you"? That's different from knowing for a fact as you just pretended you did. Also, if I'm a shill, why are you here? Wouldn't this place be a honeypot or whatever?

-3
AntonioOfVenice -3 points ago +1 / -4

We know that Democrats are surrounded by people that die suspiciously all the time; any of Hillary's friends, Seth Rich, Epstein, that Obama pool guy, the dead girl in Joe Scarborough's office, Joan Rivers after calling Michelle Obama a tranny, etc.

Come on, Joan Rivers? Really? Reminds me of when an old, unhealthy black lady died at age 70-something and people here cried MURDER!!!!!!! because her sister said that it was because of a vaccine that she did not take.

I balk and the scenario turn-around just because I think the quality of people involved is so different.

But you know the people on the other side think exactly the same thing, that as laughable as it seems to us, Joe Biden is a 'decent man', and Trump isn't? You can't just dismiss as scenario because you think it's unlikely. I'm not saying that it is likely, only that no one changes his political views wholesale because the son of a prez candidate turns out to be something nasty.

Sam's problem is that he is so rabidly anti-Trump because of the media he consumes and the people he surrounds himself with. He openly expresses and indulges in his hypocrisy that he's okay with a conspiracy to keep Trump out of office by hiding Hunter's laptop, but then tries to pretend that it wasn't a conspiracy either, and that it can't be a "Left Wing" conspiracy because Liz Cheney was involved (same clip as above).

LOL. Don't remind me. It's so absurd. First admit that it's a left-wing conspiracy, then say that it's not left-wing because Cheney crime family and not a conspiracy because SHUT UP RACIST.

I don't need him to support Trump, I need him to be the honest intellectual that he has built a career pretending to be.

I actually agree. I stopped listening to Sam & Bill Maher because their TDS just became so boring. I also think that the sentiments he expressed in the clip you mentioned are very anti-democratic and quite bad, just that the particular thing you took issue with is hardly unique to Sam as the rest of it is.

-5
AntonioOfVenice -5 points ago +1 / -6

Yeah, given the fact that this correlates with secularity and atheism, I don't think it has anything at all to do with 'the Talmud'.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol it is a quote from a book

Is it? Have you ever even opened the book? If so, why did you cite your Wikipedia and not the actual book?

I can only imagine what your rationale for responding is at this point

If only you try to stonewall enough, that will prove that no one else has a proper rationale for... responding.

beyond impotently convincing yourself you won le internet argument

It's definitely impotence to... call you out for citing Wikipedia.,

by Lethn
8
AntonioOfVenice 8 points ago +8 / -0

Go get 'em Joe!

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah, you are correct. When I visit this tweet logged in, it says that it is from a suspended account.

-6
AntonioOfVenice -6 points ago +2 / -8

Antonio, I recognize that being consistent in your moral philosophy may be foreign to you

It is, because close to no one is actually consistent.

Sam Harris was saying: I don't care at all about Hunter, because he's not the candidate. He made a hyperbolic example to make that clear.

if I found out that Baron Trump (not Eric, as it would appear Hunter basically lived with Joe so I’m making it as 1:1 as possible) had dead children in his room

Hunter is a 50-year-old guy. Is he shooting up crack cocaine and spending a fortune on prostitutes with Joe around in the same home? That seems a bit unlikely.

I would 100000000% cease my support for Trump as it would be impossible for Donald to not know what was happening under his own roof

Like I said, your comparison may not be entirely valid, but I'm almost sure that a lot of other people would disagree. They'll just say: "yeah, that's bad, but Biden is causing inflation and leading us all to World War III". Or "orange man bad, Alvin Bragg told us so and DEMOCRACY".

Besides, people have been voting for candidates who kill kids for decades, from both parties.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›