1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd be more worried about votes not mattering at all than to try to limit what doesn't matter.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because inherited wealth makes better decisions?

22
AntonioOfVenice 22 points ago +22 / -0

Kim Jung Un is the moral superior of the lowlifes in charge of the UK - the Deep State, not Labour, this same thing happened under the 'Conservatives'.

12
AntonioOfVenice 12 points ago +12 / -0

You get what you deserve.

34
AntonioOfVenice 34 points ago +35 / -1

The fat cunt is proving Imp's point.

"Thank you so much for saving everyone in this subway car, but I'm afraid we now have to jail you for the rest of your life."

21
AntonioOfVenice 21 points ago +21 / -0

I'm not sure. I think they showed that they'll celebrate whoever the television tells them to celebrate.

I'm tired of pretending that these people have their own opinions, when I can just turn on CNN and discover what they 'think'.

13
AntonioOfVenice 13 points ago +13 / -0

First of all, I like that you voice unpopular views, especially as it's not "media orthodoxy" either, but your own unique point of view.

But what makes you think that this is necessary for anyone? If people have 'mental distress that is so distress that they will self-harm', that is a mental issue. If you have a mental issue that tells you that your arm should not be there, the solution is not to chop off your arm, but to cure that.

8
AntonioOfVenice 8 points ago +8 / -0

Clearly, that doesn't work. You created an interest group fighting for the 'rights' of these perverts. Just like it doesn't work to let people be obese, because due to their sheer size and numbers, they will then try to get special privileges on that basis.

15
AntonioOfVenice 15 points ago +16 / -1

Video games and alcohol are good in small doses. Mutilation in small doses is also bad. Cars have huge advantages that grossly outweigh car crashes. Mutilation has no advantages.

Also, what people do to their bodies doesn't stay private. Those mutilated freaks will then demand access to women's spaces.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +4 / -1

Request and pay for out of pocket? Sure why not.

First, do no harm.

I would not even have an objection to this specifically if you could pay a doctor to amputate your arm without any cause, though I find that undesirable, but my main issue is that this form of mutilation has special status.

18
AntonioOfVenice 18 points ago +21 / -3

It's not OK for adults either. I know some people are on the "adults should be able to do with their own bodies" tour, and that's true to some extent. This in no way requires doctors to be complicit in what you do.

You're free to hack off your hand, because you are transabled, but you're not free to demand that a doctor do that for you.

-10
AntonioOfVenice -10 points ago +1 / -11

If "most people" aren't, then I'm not talking about "most people".

I tend to agree with most of what you say in this comment - though I didn't find him either lovable or hateable, just a little annoying.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

This thread gave me the impression that people drove him away. The kind of person to cheer someone leaving is the kind of person to do that. Of course they should say it when they think he's saying something dumb.

-13
AntonioOfVenice -13 points ago +2 / -15

Didn't sound like it, but maybe you're just not very bright. And the point would stand regardless.

-15
AntonioOfVenice -15 points ago +3 / -18

If you weren't scared of words, you wouldn't be cheering someone leaving the board.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

At first, I was confusing him with another guy, but now I sort of do remember him because I had a few interactions with him. That said, while he was no fan of me [/Trump], I don't approve of giving people hate or driving them off a forum.

There are many more objectively retarded people here.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not really, so many different names in there that I can barely follow it.

Seems that this guy's argument is "because it's Valve, the fact that X is normally a red flag doesn't matter". I don't see how you can pretend that disagreeing with that is an 'objectively bad take'.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

There are better ways to raise the possibility that you might be paranoid and mentally ill than this.

-1
AntonioOfVenice -1 points ago +1 / -2

Lethn rarely missed an opportunity to criticize the right in any thread that was critical of the left - which is most of the threads here - and I rarely failed to point out thos compulsion. So you’re either blind or dishonest, and we know which one it is.

Everyone who doesn't agree with current_horror is either blind or dishonest.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't care about Speed Tree either way, don't even know what it is.

-4
AntonioOfVenice -4 points ago +2 / -6

thanks Dom for feeding his ego by stickying it for years

To paraphrase Taleb, the worst of the producers is superior to the best of the critics.

Politics? Only his enlightened "The Right Wing is worse than the Left because they annoy me more" take was allowed.

Never saw that. However, now that I remember who he was, he did get annoyed by me because I argued that women aren't as bad as he claimed they were.

Arrogance may be off-putting, but then again, so is being stubborn as a mule, don't you think?

He was also a big believer in that a different .win community (ConPro I think) was going around and downvoting/trolling him anytime he got disagreement. Because only that could be the reason anyone disagreed with him on anything.

Sounds like the Imp, but I've witnessed that firsthand.

-3
AntonioOfVenice -3 points ago +2 / -5

Sounds like not a bad take but rather an opinion with which you didn't agree.

Why the cheering that he deleted his accounts, and suggestions it was for 'opsec'?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›