Are you pro-Ukraine war as well then? Zelensky is a modern example of a leader out for his own interests and not that of his country, provoking a fight for no benefit for his people that ends in mass casualties and destruction.
Different motives, because Zelensky is far more of a pawn than Hitler was, but same result and the blame can be left at their feet for their nation being destroyed.
Sure sign you lost the argument right here - go actually read up on the history of 30s/40s germany zoomer. Stalin and Hitler were allies until halfway through WW2, because they were ideological cousins. That poster is right, you're a nitwit that raged out instead of actually doing your own research and figuring out that you were actually wrong.
George Soros was a nazi. Totalitarian leftists supported a totalitarian leftist ideology as long as they personally benefited, are you surprised?
Nearly all the men with balls left that country to the colonies or died off in wars. The positive elements of English culture were preserved better in the U.S. than England, which is now committing suicide on a national scale. Their "calmness" isn't poise and self-control, it's weakness.
It's not funny that they're literally allowing their country to be consumed by a culture hostile to everything they hold dear with no resistance, nor is it funny that they've regressed to being ruled as serfs by their government after a brief dalliance with freedom, but it is true. The country who gave us the Magna Carta is now so pussified that if you shot a muslim that tried to rape your wife or children you'd go to jail, and people are sent to jail for speaking about it. That was a decade ago.
Now if you speak out about children being groomed and castrated by troons you can be sent to jail.
Dude is a schizo identity politics preacher, just for a different faction. Collectivist ideologies are mental illness, and he needs to go touch grass. The last couple years have made everyone in the west a little crazy, so of course the crazies gonna get crazier.
I'd like to hear your re-evaluation of that final point of yours after you've finished the book, because I can't be sure I wouldn't accidentally spoil things for you if we talked about it.
It's this mindset that killing is an absolute moral wrong - this mindset that many fans will recognize as a symptom of Batman's severe mental illness, that has pervaded western society. So while criminals get a pass, people that kill in defense of themselves, others and society get lambasted as monsters. This mindset is not logical, it's not healthy for society and it's been turned into a tool to pacify people.
Thankfully in the US it's only partially taken root - you can see the end result of this in the state of the UK and it's self-defense law.
From a purely economic standpoint, ignoring party policies and social insanity, it is actually centrist.
Regardless of your other beliefs, it is purely observable fact that labor works on supply and demand principles, and immigration reduces wages and unbalances this in favor of corporations. If you explain this in terms of workers rights it could technically be a democrat argument (and was a few decades ago) but the modern left trades in denying reality.
Restricting immigration when we are having a declining middle class, when we have no shortage of labor and our economy is going to shit is an obvious action with no actual functional arguments against it, ignoring ideological ones. If we had an enormous demand for labor and no supply and that was hampering economic activity, then opening immigration again could be a centrist policy.