In the weirdest twist of 2020 so far, the WHO is now against further lockdowns.
(mobile.twitter.com)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
I wouldn't trust the WHO on anything, even if it says something I agree with.
Didn't they say something about Covid-19 being a good opportunity to bring gender equality?
Or was that the UN? I get the CCP-owned, feminist-leaning bullshit brigades confused sometimes.
Realistically they had to let up at some point, so there was always going to be a time in which you were in agreement with them. All that matters is you don't hold your current opinions on the matter because of them.
No one but American-born to American-born parents American Nationalists have America's best interest at heart.
Immigrants don't, non-Christians don't, and most non-whites don't.
Pretending otherwise is stupid.
I am an outlier to your assumptions.
I am fully an American nationalist but I am not Christian, I am an immigrant from an Asian country.
I was not American born and yet through experience I have learned to despise leftist policies and the leftists themselves.
I fully support the first and second amendments and the U.S. Constitution as a whole.
I am against mass migration of refugees and am for greatly reducing immigration overall because I know that mass immigration under the Hart Celler Act will only fatten the voting rolls of the left and destroy America.
You are correct that most non-whites don't have America's best interests at heart.
I disagree with your statement that "No one but American-born to American-born parents American Nationalists have America's best interest at heart. Immigrants don't, non-Christians don't"
If I exist, I am not enough of a unicorn that no other individuals like me exists.
With the globalists aiming to destroy America, we will all need to stand together.
Please don't assume that everyone who doesn't fit your criteria perfectly is against you or is not worthy of being your ally.
Based and yellow pilled.
Let me clarify myself a bit.
First, I think whites and asians are natural allies. We are the most advanced in virtually every aspect and are very sympathetic to each other's existence.
I'm not making the claim that there are no good non-whites or non-Christians. There are plenty. The problem is that from a national perspective they are so few as to be nonexistent, and to put your faith in them towards the above stated goals is absolute folly. If a copy of you were to run for office you'd think thrice about voting for them, wondering if they really hold those values or are just grifters.
I don't.
Again it's just that they number so few it's hardly worth considering.
The best example is the Nazi party's views on blacks in their empire. They were so few and so minor that really there was no policy dealing with them. It was inconsequential.
I'd love to see asians and whites join together to combat the degenerate and world-destroying antics of the other ethnic castes, but I hold no hope in it happening.
Where do you stand on the issue of reversing the Hart Celler Act and keeping America a nation of predominantly European peoples?
It's considerably less important than ensuring America remains a nation of predominantly European memes. Far better to have a multi-racial monoculture than a mono-racial multi-culture, as can be seen in every European country where Leftists have overtaken nativists.
I would support it as long as it means you wouldn't try to throw me out.
I have been here in the U.S. for decades.
I am an American first and a nationalist. People like me deserve to be here more than globalist leftist filth that just happened to be born white and born here.
I think we can find common ground here. I'm not terribly keen on throwing people out of the country aside from those who are here as criminal invaders. On the other hand I'd really rather America remain a white country. Rolling back our immigration policy to include the wording "free white people of good character" would be a good step in that direction.
I have no problem with what you are proposing if you truly have no intention in throwing out people who have already legally become citizens.
The only thing I would add is to warn you that not all European whites are who you would want to join your country if you wanted to prevent it from being turned into a leftist hellhole.
Right now many white people in France, Germany, Sweden and the U.K. have become weak fools who will vote for disastrous leftist policies such as unfettered Islamic mass migration.
My ancestors fought against Islam so I know that resisting the Islamic horde is crucial to survival.
If you mean you want more strong white people who resist leftist policies such as those in Poland and Hungary, I wholly support it.
Free white people of good character is a little vague.
What we really need is white people who have a proven history of resisting foolish leftist policies such as Islamic mass migration.
That's why we had the "of good character" clause. Not sure it would do much for us now as the cultural values have drifted catastrophically since the words were penned, but it's supposed to guard against letting in undesirables who would otherwise meet immigration criteria.
I think at the root there needs to be an acceptance of adversity baked into the system. The core of the leftist ideology is embracing weakness and incompetence and then deferring all responsibility. They can only get away with that because we have such unprecedented prosperity that they can literally fail at life and not keel over dead from it. I don't know how to achieve this, but I think if you can create an incentive structure that discourages failure you'll see this ideology recede.
How can you prove you exist? How can I prove I exist? In truth, how can any of us prove we exist?
So the WHO wants everyone out of lockdown for whatever the globalists have coming next in 2020?
I am guessing that the globalists are planning to release a truly deadly virus in case that Trump still wins despite the planned voter fraud.
If everyone is under lockdown they cannot hit maximum infection.
Bill Gates has been going on numerous media outlets talking about the next pandemic and how dangerous it will be. He is itching to roll out his vaccines and his digital certificates in microchip form.
I would wager that the hell of 2020 will get only worse.
The WHO wants the lockdowns to stop because the big big bois in the background whispering in their ear realized that these lockdowns are a breeding ground for Nationalism, Traditionalism, and an end to unfettered immigration.
Fear of the foreigner is, in part, the result of an evolutionarily-advantageous avoidance of foreign diseases.
Nothing like a good old-fashioned plague to make people remember one of the reasons we didn't do much mixing back in the day.
Oh fuck. You're probably right.
Possible. I think there's a couple more optimistic possibilities.
They've realized the lockdowns are causing more harm than good. In the US, places like NY and California are badly broken at the moment, and unless they restart the economies soon they're not going to be able to keep their bread and circus programs going. Sure, Pelosi and co are still trying to get federal bailout money but even that is a weak bandaid rather than an actual fix. Couple that with continued lockdown protests continuing all over the place (even though the MSM rarely reports on them), and several states saying they won't be doing any further lockdowns it will rapidly become obvious to everyone that these were a huge mistake.
They just want to spike the covid numbers. Birx is already talking about muh second wave, but while the infection numbers have gone up a bit with schools the death rate is still going down. Current deaths per day is about the same as it was in mid-July. Infection fatality rate among confirmed cases is closing in on 2.8% (and thus likely much lower than that due to untested cases) and its becoming clearer and clearer that the disease is just not that scary. By trying to spike the covid numbers they can say "See, we were right all along!" and try to make people panic about a second wave.
China decided that lockdowns are now hurting their imperialist schemes and the WHO complies.
I saw people talking about this on TD, so I posted it here.
I don't know how to feel about this. The WHO is not a good organization, so why would they change tactics?
Trump withdrew US membership to the WHO. He bailed on the covidity a couple of months ago. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-administration-world-health-organization-who-withdrawal-notice
IMHO the WHO has actual experts who know what they are talking about but the leadership doesn't give a shit. Sometimes you can hear the experts in talks nobody pays attention to and they say the opposite of what the political leadership of the WHO says.
For example there was a talk with some WHO epidemiologist or virologist from around December last year stating they suspected human to human transmission because that's what happens with these viruses. Yet publicly the WHO claimed months later that there's no human to human transmission.
As usual politics ruin everything.
No more lockdowns to hit the final nail in the coffin of the western countries economy. Smurt.