I've mentioned it before to on social media to deafening silence, but it amazes me that politicians and people on the left like to pretend that Antifa is a myth simply because they haven't published some sort of organizational structure chart for all to see.
It's ridiculous to assume that just because a group doesn't operate in a normal way that they don't exist. They act like people can't come together in small local cells and unify under a common cause while connecting through technology to organize into one much larger collective without the need for a clear leader. Who said a leader was necessary for a group to exist to begin with?
Following their logic, street gangs don't exist because they're not 'proper organizations' either.
But more to the point, since we're talking about a group that organizes in cells primarily through technology before putting their plans into action, let's point to a group that the media has openly claimed exists for many years now that's strikingly similar – "Anonymous."
I've been stunned at how all of these people can deny the existence of Antifa – which has had an obviously much stronger presence in the real world – while simultaneously pointing to "Anonymous" for various things over the years.
I mean really, who is this "4chan" anyway? (C'mon, we've all heard these jokes)
At first I was surprised that they believed that Anitfa was a myth, then I quickly realized that them saying that was all part of their plan.
But, apparently there's still plenty of people who believe it. There's also those who do believe they exist and are dumb enough to think that just because they named themselves something nice, they must be good guys!
I'm happy to see their narrative slowly erode as more and more information comes out like this.
it amazes me that politicians and people on the left like to pretend that Antifa is a myth simply because they haven't published some sort of organizational structure chart for all to see
I think this may go some way to explaining things:
There was a comment on KiA2 I think, something along the lines of "Leftists will take the most implausible of plausible deniability and pretend they're as pure as Jesus."
The Anti-Fascist Hanbook by Mark Bray explicitly says to deny existing and use organizations with better PR, like BLM, as fronts. One would think putting that in the instruction manual on Amazon would make it hard to deny but honk honk.
I've mentioned it before to on social media to deafening silence, but it amazes me that politicians and people on the left like to pretend that Antifa is a myth simply because they haven't published some sort of organizational structure chart for all to see.
It's ridiculous to assume that just because a group doesn't operate in a normal way that they don't exist. They act like people can't come together in small local cells and unify under a common cause while connecting through technology to organize into one much larger collective without the need for a clear leader. Who said a leader was necessary for a group to exist to begin with?
Following their logic, street gangs don't exist because they're not 'proper organizations' either.
But more to the point, since we're talking about a group that organizes in cells primarily through technology before putting their plans into action, let's point to a group that the media has openly claimed exists for many years now that's strikingly similar – "Anonymous."
I've been stunned at how all of these people can deny the existence of Antifa – which has had an obviously much stronger presence in the real world – while simultaneously pointing to "Anonymous" for various things over the years.
I mean really, who is this "4chan" anyway? (C'mon, we've all heard these jokes)
At first I was surprised that they believed that Anitfa was a myth, then I quickly realized that them saying that was all part of their plan.
But, apparently there's still plenty of people who believe it. There's also those who do believe they exist and are dumb enough to think that just because they named themselves something nice, they must be good guys!
I'm happy to see their narrative slowly erode as more and more information comes out like this.
I think this may go some way to explaining things:
A Narcissist's Prayer
That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did...
You deserved it.
So they've weaponized "Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by stupidity"?
There was a comment on KiA2 I think, something along the lines of "Leftists will take the most implausible of plausible deniability and pretend they're as pure as Jesus."
The Anti-Fascist Hanbook by Mark Bray explicitly says to deny existing and use organizations with better PR, like BLM, as fronts. One would think putting that in the instruction manual on Amazon would make it hard to deny but honk honk.
Those are obviously false flags conducted by Drumphs followers you Nazi!
Even these people wouldn't recognize facism if it shot them in the face. So no, they aren't antifa, they're just useful idiots to hide behind.