The New Call of Duty Promotes "fAr-RiGhT" - Kotaku In Action 2

The New Call of Duty Promotes "fAr-RiGhT" (web.archive.org)

posted 5 years ago by 666sadfrogs 5 years ago by 666sadfrogs +19 / -0

11 comments

11 comments share save hide report block hide replies

Comments (11)

sorted by:

▲ 17 ▼

– malapropcomic 17 points 5 years ago +17 / -0

Anything right of Mao is far right to these degenerate fucks

permalink save report block reply

▲ 11 ▼

– jubyeonin 11 points 5 years ago +11 / -0

Haha. Actual KOTAKU IN ACTION. Nice.

If you look into the article links, Bezmenov's interviewer does apparently say that HIV is not a virus, but the "alt-right" recruitment is completely fake. All this tool has to go on is HIV not being a virus but rather an immunodeficiency caused by drugs in treatment. Literally has nothing to do with anything.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 9 ▼

– lgbtqwtfbbq 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

I've still never heard anyone try to challenge Bezmenov's bona fides. I don't give a shit what the interviewer believes: people can be right about one thing while wrong about another, and I don't watch the video to hear the views of the interviewer. I care about two things:

Is Bezmenov who he says he is?
Is what Bezmenov saying accurate?

Both should be simple questions to answer. Especially question #2 now that we have the benefit of 30 years' of hindsight, but question #1 as well since the Cold War is over and a lot of those files have been declassified.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– kc446 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

The only challenge I got was "Of course he is going to tell a fantastic tale, HE IS A RUSSIAN KGB ASSET" without actually explaining what exactly is wrong with what he said.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 6 ▼

– mikhalych 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

They also complain about him going to a right wing think tank. Obviously, a soviet defector should've run to the CPUSA instead. Or something.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– Norenia 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

GAME DROP!

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– acp_k2win 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

If only

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

▲ 20 ▼

– deleted 20 points 5 years ago +20 / -0

▲ 10 ▼

– mikhalych 10 points 5 years ago +10 / -0

We're not the ones who accepted re-written passages of Mein Kampf.

As a publishable scientific result. I donnt think even the author saw it that way. That's arguably even worse.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– Knife-TotingRat 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

For those OOTL:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/duped-academic-journal-publishes-rewrite-of-mein-kampf-as-feminist-manifesto/

Here's a quote from the article that gave me the giggles:

Theological fire and brimstone writing “didn’t transliterate easily,” Lindsay said. However, “much of ‘Mein Kampf’ is an autoethnography.” This style of self-reflective writing is en vogue in the grievance studies’ academic journals and therefore the substitution of feminist or anti-patriarchal terminology for Hitler’s well-known screed was evidently undetectable to the peer reviewers.

According to a comment from the co-editor of the journal, the reviewers were “supportive of the work and noted its potential to generate important dialogue for social workers and feminist scholars.”

-- As it says just before this, what they rewrote was taken from a chapter in which the author describes why his party is needed, and what is expected of good party members ...

permalink parent save report block reply