That shift gave degenerate organizations the ability to play husband against wife and guaranteed the collapse of the family structure. Now today we see the result. Virtually all "social justice" initiatives are started and led by bitter women.
Voting is an individual right. If you deny someone this right, you are essentially saying you know what is best for them, and that they should fall in line.
That's authoritarian bullshit that should never fly in a free society.
Voting is itself worthless if the enterprise does not exist to better the Nation.
Democracy is a failure precisely because of the idea of "voting as a right."
Does a 60IQ downie have the mental capacity to debate politics? No. Obviously not. Their vote is nothing but an extended vote of their handlers.
The same is true for women. Their vote should be tied to the vote of the family and the vote of the family is the responsibility of the husband.
By pushing for endless expansion of voting rights you're pushing for the endless degradation of the system of voting itself. Today it is no longer tied to family, no longer tied to land, and no longer tied to national origin. That's a mistake.
What you want is a fairy tale that doesn't exist. In reality your utopian desire is a fast-track to the dystopian hell we find ourselves in today.
I see you prefer the wealth of the nation over the wealth of the individual. In that case, why vote at all? Monarchy is a much more agile form of government and will serve to "better the nation" much more than any form of democracy. Autocracy and (actual) Facism are also fine choices.
Of course, the wealth of the nation always comes at the cost of the wealth of the individual. See: Modern China, the British Empire, Pre-War Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, Rome, etc.
I totally get it, there are shitty women in politics right now. In the States we have Clinton, Harris, Pelosi, and a bunch of DAs who won't prosecute rioters. All of these people are absolute scum.
But do we condemn half of the human race because a few shitty people share a trait with them? By that logic, Men should never be allowed to own guns because most gun crimes are committed by men, whites should never be allowed to hold office again because Hitler was white, and the SJWs are correct in voiding the rights of white males because most of the slave owners were white males. The philosophy of holding entire populations accountable for the crimes and mistakes of a subset of said populations is nonsensical.
Glow Harder
Giving women the right to vote was a mistake.
That shift gave degenerate organizations the ability to play husband against wife and guaranteed the collapse of the family structure. Now today we see the result. Virtually all "social justice" initiatives are started and led by bitter women.
Voting is an individual right. If you deny someone this right, you are essentially saying you know what is best for them, and that they should fall in line.
That's authoritarian bullshit that should never fly in a free society.
Voting is itself worthless if the enterprise does not exist to better the Nation.
Democracy is a failure precisely because of the idea of "voting as a right."
Does a 60IQ downie have the mental capacity to debate politics? No. Obviously not. Their vote is nothing but an extended vote of their handlers.
The same is true for women. Their vote should be tied to the vote of the family and the vote of the family is the responsibility of the husband.
By pushing for endless expansion of voting rights you're pushing for the endless degradation of the system of voting itself. Today it is no longer tied to family, no longer tied to land, and no longer tied to national origin. That's a mistake.
What you want is a fairy tale that doesn't exist. In reality your utopian desire is a fast-track to the dystopian hell we find ourselves in today.
I see you prefer the wealth of the nation over the wealth of the individual. In that case, why vote at all? Monarchy is a much more agile form of government and will serve to "better the nation" much more than any form of democracy. Autocracy and (actual) Facism are also fine choices.
Of course, the wealth of the nation always comes at the cost of the wealth of the individual. See: Modern China, the British Empire, Pre-War Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, Rome, etc.
Voting isn't a right in most parts of the world. At least not for men.
I totally get it, there are shitty women in politics right now. In the States we have Clinton, Harris, Pelosi, and a bunch of DAs who won't prosecute rioters. All of these people are absolute scum.
But do we condemn half of the human race because a few shitty people share a trait with them? By that logic, Men should never be allowed to own guns because most gun crimes are committed by men, whites should never be allowed to hold office again because Hitler was white, and the SJWs are correct in voiding the rights of white males because most of the slave owners were white males. The philosophy of holding entire populations accountable for the crimes and mistakes of a subset of said populations is nonsensical.
Simp
Fed
She's not gonna sleep with you.
Who exactly? My individualist ideals? Hate to break it to ya, but concepts don't have pussies.
Or mass for that matter.
Glow Harder.