Voting is itself worthless if the enterprise does not exist to better the Nation.
Democracy is a failure precisely because of the idea of "voting as a right."
Does a 60IQ downie have the mental capacity to debate politics? No. Obviously not. Their vote is nothing but an extended vote of their handlers.
The same is true for women. Their vote should be tied to the vote of the family and the vote of the family is the responsibility of the husband.
By pushing for endless expansion of voting rights you're pushing for the endless degradation of the system of voting itself. Today it is no longer tied to family, no longer tied to land, and no longer tied to national origin. That's a mistake.
What you want is a fairy tale that doesn't exist. In reality your utopian desire is a fast-track to the dystopian hell we find ourselves in today.
I see you prefer the wealth of the nation over the wealth of the individual. In that case, why vote at all? Monarchy is a much more agile form of government and will serve to "better the nation" much more than any form of democracy. Autocracy and (actual) Facism are also fine choices.
Of course, the wealth of the nation always comes at the cost of the wealth of the individual. See: Modern China, the British Empire, Pre-War Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, Rome, etc.
Also, funny how your posts are upvoted twice within seconds of posting. Either you've got a loyal simp refreshing the page, or you're using multiple accounts.
Voting is itself worthless if the enterprise does not exist to better the Nation.
Democracy is a failure precisely because of the idea of "voting as a right."
Does a 60IQ downie have the mental capacity to debate politics? No. Obviously not. Their vote is nothing but an extended vote of their handlers.
The same is true for women. Their vote should be tied to the vote of the family and the vote of the family is the responsibility of the husband.
By pushing for endless expansion of voting rights you're pushing for the endless degradation of the system of voting itself. Today it is no longer tied to family, no longer tied to land, and no longer tied to national origin. That's a mistake.
What you want is a fairy tale that doesn't exist. In reality your utopian desire is a fast-track to the dystopian hell we find ourselves in today.
I see you prefer the wealth of the nation over the wealth of the individual. In that case, why vote at all? Monarchy is a much more agile form of government and will serve to "better the nation" much more than any form of democracy. Autocracy and (actual) Facism are also fine choices.
Of course, the wealth of the nation always comes at the cost of the wealth of the individual. See: Modern China, the British Empire, Pre-War Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, Rome, etc.
I have not used the word or idea of wealth a single time in this discussion.
Do you understand at all what I've been saying?
Now we're arguing semantics.
Also, funny how your posts are upvoted twice within seconds of posting. Either you've got a loyal simp refreshing the page, or you're using multiple accounts.
Or you're an idiot who is too full of themselves to accept that they have no idea what they're talking about.
You're simping for women while accusing someone of having simps for... attacking women? Just think about that for a second bud.
On the issue of semantics, no.
You have no idea what I've been saying this whole time. Your last two posts make that clear.
Let me spell it out:
It is in the greatest interest of a Nation to promote stable, happy, loving families with many children.
Feminism, women's suffrage, and women holding prime political positions all goes against that greater issue of family.
What you support is women being given a role superseding that of a wife. In doing so you're advocating for the death of the Nation.