Not gonna say it's always a doomed methodology, but if not done in a specific way it will just result in losing even faster and more thoroughly. And you cheering it on the whole way.
The US is already owned by jewish oligarchs, so the outcome can't be any worse than it already is. If my choice is between systematically genociding whites, or systematically genociding whites and jews, then buckle up Schlomo, because you're going down with me.
Not gonna say it's always a doomed methodology, but if not done in a specific way it will just result in losing even faster and more thoroughly. And you cheering it on the whole way.
This, losing faster has never been a valid strategy.
If the system is beyond reform, the only way to escape the system is for it to collapse.
So yes, "losing faster" is a valid strategy. See: the USSR.
How do you know it will 'collapse' rather than things just getting worse and worse and worse?
It's already just getting worse and worse and worse; what's your point?
Russia is completely owned by jewish oligarchs. Thats in no way a desirable outcome.
The US is already owned by jewish oligarchs, so the outcome can't be any worse than it already is. If my choice is between systematically genociding whites, or systematically genociding whites and jews, then buckle up Schlomo, because you're going down with me.
And the USSR wasn't?
And it was replaced by what?