My point is that people too easily think that if things just get a little worse, things will 'collapse'. Show 1/10 of what is happening today to someone living 50 years ago and he'd say that things would have collapsed a long time ago.
The US is already owned by jewish oligarchs, so the outcome can't be any worse than it already is. If my choice is between systematically genociding whites, or systematically genociding whites and jews, then buckle up Schlomo, because you're going down with me.
If my choice is between systematically genociding whites, or systematically genociding whites and jews
That’s not the choice what so ever. Kikes will escape the second it comes time to genocide anything, like they have every single time throughout history.
This, losing faster has never been a valid strategy.
If the system is beyond reform, the only way to escape the system is for it to collapse.
So yes, "losing faster" is a valid strategy. See: the USSR.
How do you know it will 'collapse' rather than things just getting worse and worse and worse?
It's already just getting worse and worse and worse; what's your point?
My point is that people too easily think that if things just get a little worse, things will 'collapse'. Show 1/10 of what is happening today to someone living 50 years ago and he'd say that things would have collapsed a long time ago.
Russia is completely owned by jewish oligarchs. Thats in no way a desirable outcome.
The US is already owned by jewish oligarchs, so the outcome can't be any worse than it already is. If my choice is between systematically genociding whites, or systematically genociding whites and jews, then buckle up Schlomo, because you're going down with me.
That’s not the choice what so ever. Kikes will escape the second it comes time to genocide anything, like they have every single time throughout history.
What an idiotic plan.
And the USSR wasn't?
Interesting. It's almost as if passively waiting and doing nothing doesn't defeat your enemies.
And it was replaced by what?